Legal History Notes - Reception of English Law in Australia

Terminology

  • Ticket of leave: A permit allowing convicts a certain amount of freedom. Convicts with a ticket of leave were able to work for wages and live on their own, but they were restricted to a certain area and had to report regularly to the authorities.
  • Commutation of sentence: The reduction of a convict's original sentence.
  • Conditional pardon: Released convicts with conditions attached.
  • Absolute pardon: Released convicts without conditions.
  • Free by servitude/certificates of freedom: Convicts who had served their full sentence and were given certificates attesting to that fact.
  • Exclusives: Free settlers.
  • Emancipists: Convicts who had been freed.

Timeline

  • 1760-1837: The Crown was ruled by George III, Regency, George IV, and William IV, and Victoria.
  • Australia: Cook maps east coast, First Fleet/Arthur Phillip, William Bligh, Lachlan Macquarie, Thomas Brisbane, Ralph Darling, and Richard Bourke.
  • The World: American Revolution, French Revolution, French-British Wars, Napoleon crowned, Trafalgar, and Waterloo/Congress of Vienna.

The Rule of Law in the 18th Century

  • Recap of previous modules (4-6):
    • Responsible government
    • Rise of the Whigs
    • The US Constitution
    • Social contract
    • Individual rights
  • The dark side of the rule of law included slavery, the Bloody Code, and transportation.

The Bloody Code

  • Description of the 18th-century English criminal justice system.
  • In 1688, there were 50 offenses punishable by death.
  • By 1800, this had increased to over 220 offenses.
  • Offenses largely focused on the defense of private property.
  • Grand larceny was defined as the theft of goods worth more than 12 pence.

Why New South Wales?

  • Transportation was the old idea of banishment or exile.
  • From 1788-1868, one-third of all British convicts were transported to New South Wales, Van Diemen’s Land, and Western Australia.
  • Important Legislation:
    • Transportation Act 1717 (UK)
    • Criminal Law Act 1776 (UK)
    • Transportation Acts 1784 and 1785 (UK)
    • New South Wales Courts Act 1787 (UK)
  • Traditional View:
    • North America was unavailable.
    • Hulks and gaols were overcrowded.
    • New South Wales was seen as a convict dumping ground.
  • Modern View:
    • Multifaceted reasons: financial, strategic, and penal reasons.
    • Naval trade.
    • Supply of flax and timber.
    • New sea routes.
    • Sealing and whaling opportunities.
  • Jeremy Bentham: ‘The moon was then, as it continues to be, inaccessible: on earth there was no accessible spot more distant than New South Wales’.
  • Low rate of transportation pre-1820s (<500 per annum).
  • Repeal of Bloody Code laws (1830s >5000 pa).
  • Sir William Molesworth’s recommendations.
  • The old deterrence system was replaced.
  • Systematic policing, prosecution, and imprisonment were introduced.
  • The end of transportation to New South Wales occurred in 1840.
  • High rate to Van Diemen’s Land until 1853.

The Economy, Political System, and Legal System in Early New South Wales

  • Felony attaint: Convicts sentenced to death (even if commuted to transportation) could not:
    • Sell, purchase, or hold property.
    • Make contracts.
    • Sue.
    • Give evidence in court.
    • This was ignored in NSW (1788–1820).
    • Cable v Sinclair [1788] NSWKR 6
  • Economy:
    • Reliance on convicts.
    • Army officers’ defiance of colonial office policy on land grants.
    • The significance of the Second Fleet (June 1790):
      • Six ships.
      • High mortality (26.5%).
    • The New South Wales Corps (‘The Rum Corps’).
    • Growing tensions: enriched army officers as against naval governors.
    • A highly factionalized society.
    • Governors reliant on wealthy emancipists.
  • Political authority: The Governor
    • Commissions granted autocratic powers.
    • Early tensions arose between the Governor and army officers.
    • Later tensions developed between the Governor and exclusives – the change with Macquarie.
    • Support for affluent emancipists.
    • The right of emancipists to sit on juries and be appointed attorneys.
    • The appointment of emancipists as magistrates.
    • Political authority: Limits on the Governor’s power
    • The withdrawal of Governors’ commissions.
    • Successor Governor reversing past Governor’s policies.
    • Non-cooperation.
    • The use of the law courts.
    • Second Charter of Justice 1814 … and introducing the Bent brothers!
  • The courts: Ellis Bent and Jeffrey Hart Bent
    • Ellis Bent, Deputy Judge Advocate of NSW
    • Jeffrey Hart Bent was appointed judge of new Supreme Court of Civil Judicature (1814)
    • JH Bent quarreled with Macquarie over:
      • Court accommodation
      • Port and turnpike regulations
      • Emancipist attorneys
    • The new Supreme Court remained closed!
    • Ellis died November 1815
    • Ellis (already dead) and JH Bent recalled April 1816
  • The Bigge Inquiry:
    • Inquiry into Macquarie’s government.
    • Investigate whether transportation was a deterrent to crime
    • Appointment of Bigge
  • Outcomes:
    • A drastic cut to convict freedoms.
    • Places of secondary punishment established.
    • Convict attaint reimposed.
    • Land grants to convicts terminated.
    • Macquarie loses the politics.

Reception of English Law in Australia

  • New South Wales Act 1823 (UK)
    • Van Diemen’s Land separated from New South Wales.
    • An appointed Legislative Council is established.
    • Supreme Courts of New South Wales and Van Diemen’s Land are established.
    • Criminal cases tried by a jury of seven army or naval officers.
    • Civil cases heard by the Chief Justice and two magistrates, and a jury of 12 men if the parties agreed.
    • Courts of General and Quarter Sessions to hear ‘crimes and misdemeanours not punishable by death’.
    • Chief Justice had to certify that colonial laws were not repugnant to English law.
    • Appeals from the Supreme Courts of New South Wales and Van Diemen’s Land to:
      • Court of Appeal of New South Wales (i.e., the Chief Justice + the Governor).
      • Privy Council
    • Sunset clause in the Act.
  • Freedom of the press
    • The Sydney Gazette
      • Australia’s first newspaper
      • Government’s mouthpiece 1803–1824
    • Brisbane’s freedom of press experiment September 1824
    • Wardell and Wentworth's Australian October 1824
    • Edward’s ’radical journal’, Monitor 1826
    • Sudds–Thompson case 1826
    • Newspaper Acts
    • Opinion [1827] NSWSupC 23 Apr–May 1827
  • Freedom of the press
    • Joseph Sudds and Patrick Thompson​
    • Privates belonging to 57th (West Middlesex) Regiment stationed in New South Wales
    • Theft to be discharged ​
    • Seven years’ transportation​
    • Governor Darling intervenes
    • ​‘Commutes’ to seven years’ hard labour in chain gang​
    • Chains, iron collars, and performance of the Rogue's March​
    • Sudds’ death prompts outrage​
  • The free press: the Chief Justice and the Governor
    • Darling’s attempts to restrain the press
    • Van Diemen’s Land example copied
    • Darling: Bills for licensing the press and for stamp duty
    • Forbes declares the licensing provisions declared repugnant to English law
  • Australian Courts Act 1828 (UK)
    • “An Act to provide for the Administration of Justice in New South Wales and Van Diemen’s Land, and for the more effectual Government thereof, and for other Purposes relating thereto.”
    • Reception of English law
    • Reception Day: 25 July 1828: s 24
    • Subsequent United Kingdom statutes applied only if specifically passed for colony
    • Trial by jury in Supreme Court civil cases
    • Introduction of the jury in criminal matters becomes possible
    • The validity of legislation
    • The Chief Justice’s prior certification is removed
    • Any Supreme Court judge can advise the Legislative Council that he considers that parts of a colonial statute are repugnant to English law – but it is up to the Council to decide
    • A statute may be suspended until reviewed
    • Existing courts retained, but appeals to Governor abolished
    • The appointed Legislative Councils are enlarged