Legal History Notes - Reception of English Law in Australia
Terminology
- Ticket of leave: A permit allowing convicts a certain amount of freedom. Convicts with a ticket of leave were able to work for wages and live on their own, but they were restricted to a certain area and had to report regularly to the authorities.
- Commutation of sentence: The reduction of a convict's original sentence.
- Conditional pardon: Released convicts with conditions attached.
- Absolute pardon: Released convicts without conditions.
- Free by servitude/certificates of freedom: Convicts who had served their full sentence and were given certificates attesting to that fact.
- Exclusives: Free settlers.
- Emancipists: Convicts who had been freed.
Timeline
- 1760-1837: The Crown was ruled by George III, Regency, George IV, and William IV, and Victoria.
- Australia: Cook maps east coast, First Fleet/Arthur Phillip, William Bligh, Lachlan Macquarie, Thomas Brisbane, Ralph Darling, and Richard Bourke.
- The World: American Revolution, French Revolution, French-British Wars, Napoleon crowned, Trafalgar, and Waterloo/Congress of Vienna.
The Rule of Law in the 18th Century
- Recap of previous modules (4-6):
- Responsible government
- Rise of the Whigs
- The US Constitution
- Social contract
- Individual rights
- The dark side of the rule of law included slavery, the Bloody Code, and transportation.
The Bloody Code
- Description of the 18th-century English criminal justice system.
- In 1688, there were 50 offenses punishable by death.
- By 1800, this had increased to over 220 offenses.
- Offenses largely focused on the defense of private property.
- Grand larceny was defined as the theft of goods worth more than 12 pence.
Why New South Wales?
- Transportation was the old idea of banishment or exile.
- From 1788-1868, one-third of all British convicts were transported to New South Wales, Van Diemen’s Land, and Western Australia.
- Important Legislation:
- Transportation Act 1717 (UK)
- Criminal Law Act 1776 (UK)
- Transportation Acts 1784 and 1785 (UK)
- New South Wales Courts Act 1787 (UK)
- Traditional View:
- North America was unavailable.
- Hulks and gaols were overcrowded.
- New South Wales was seen as a convict dumping ground.
- Modern View:
- Multifaceted reasons: financial, strategic, and penal reasons.
- Naval trade.
- Supply of flax and timber.
- New sea routes.
- Sealing and whaling opportunities.
- Jeremy Bentham: ‘The moon was then, as it continues to be, inaccessible: on earth there was no accessible spot more distant than New South Wales’.
- Low rate of transportation pre-1820s (<500 per annum).
- Repeal of Bloody Code laws (1830s >5000 pa).
- Sir William Molesworth’s recommendations.
- The old deterrence system was replaced.
- Systematic policing, prosecution, and imprisonment were introduced.
- The end of transportation to New South Wales occurred in 1840.
- High rate to Van Diemen’s Land until 1853.
The Economy, Political System, and Legal System in Early New South Wales
- Felony attaint: Convicts sentenced to death (even if commuted to transportation) could not:
- Sell, purchase, or hold property.
- Make contracts.
- Sue.
- Give evidence in court.
- This was ignored in NSW (1788–1820).
- Cable v Sinclair [1788] NSWKR 6
- Economy:
- Reliance on convicts.
- Army officers’ defiance of colonial office policy on land grants.
- The significance of the Second Fleet (June 1790):
- Six ships.
- High mortality (26.5%).
- The New South Wales Corps (‘The Rum Corps’).
- Growing tensions: enriched army officers as against naval governors.
- A highly factionalized society.
- Governors reliant on wealthy emancipists.
- Political authority: The Governor
- Commissions granted autocratic powers.
- Early tensions arose between the Governor and army officers.
- Later tensions developed between the Governor and exclusives – the change with Macquarie.
- Support for affluent emancipists.
- The right of emancipists to sit on juries and be appointed attorneys.
- The appointment of emancipists as magistrates.
- Political authority: Limits on the Governor’s power
- The withdrawal of Governors’ commissions.
- Successor Governor reversing past Governor’s policies.
- Non-cooperation.
- The use of the law courts.
- Second Charter of Justice 1814 … and introducing the Bent brothers!
- The courts: Ellis Bent and Jeffrey Hart Bent
- Ellis Bent, Deputy Judge Advocate of NSW
- Jeffrey Hart Bent was appointed judge of new Supreme Court of Civil Judicature (1814)
- JH Bent quarreled with Macquarie over:
- Court accommodation
- Port and turnpike regulations
- Emancipist attorneys
- The new Supreme Court remained closed!
- Ellis died November 1815
- Ellis (already dead) and JH Bent recalled April 1816
- The Bigge Inquiry:
- Inquiry into Macquarie’s government.
- Investigate whether transportation was a deterrent to crime
- Appointment of Bigge
- Outcomes:
- A drastic cut to convict freedoms.
- Places of secondary punishment established.
- Convict attaint reimposed.
- Land grants to convicts terminated.
- Macquarie loses the politics.
Reception of English Law in Australia
- New South Wales Act 1823 (UK)
- Van Diemen’s Land separated from New South Wales.
- An appointed Legislative Council is established.
- Supreme Courts of New South Wales and Van Diemen’s Land are established.
- Criminal cases tried by a jury of seven army or naval officers.
- Civil cases heard by the Chief Justice and two magistrates, and a jury of 12 men if the parties agreed.
- Courts of General and Quarter Sessions to hear ‘crimes and misdemeanours not punishable by death’.
- Chief Justice had to certify that colonial laws were not repugnant to English law.
- Appeals from the Supreme Courts of New South Wales and Van Diemen’s Land to:
- Court of Appeal of New South Wales (i.e., the Chief Justice + the Governor).
- Privy Council
- Sunset clause in the Act.
- Freedom of the press
- The Sydney Gazette
- Australia’s first newspaper
- Government’s mouthpiece 1803–1824
- Brisbane’s freedom of press experiment September 1824
- Wardell and Wentworth's Australian October 1824
- Edward’s ’radical journal’, Monitor 1826
- Sudds–Thompson case 1826
- Newspaper Acts
- Opinion [1827] NSWSupC 23 Apr–May 1827
- Freedom of the press
- Joseph Sudds and Patrick Thompson
- Privates belonging to 57th (West Middlesex) Regiment stationed in New South Wales
- Theft to be discharged
- Seven years’ transportation
- Governor Darling intervenes
- ‘Commutes’ to seven years’ hard labour in chain gang
- Chains, iron collars, and performance of the Rogue's March
- Sudds’ death prompts outrage
- The free press: the Chief Justice and the Governor
- Darling’s attempts to restrain the press
- Van Diemen’s Land example copied
- Darling: Bills for licensing the press and for stamp duty
- Forbes declares the licensing provisions declared repugnant to English law
- Australian Courts Act 1828 (UK)
- “An Act to provide for the Administration of Justice in New South Wales and Van Diemen’s Land, and for the more effectual Government thereof, and for other Purposes relating thereto.”
- Reception of English law
- Reception Day: 25 July 1828: s 24
- Subsequent United Kingdom statutes applied only if specifically passed for colony
- Trial by jury in Supreme Court civil cases
- Introduction of the jury in criminal matters becomes possible
- The validity of legislation
- The Chief Justice’s prior certification is removed
- Any Supreme Court judge can advise the Legislative Council that he considers that parts of a colonial statute are repugnant to English law – but it is up to the Council to decide
- A statute may be suspended until reviewed
- Existing courts retained, but appeals to Governor abolished
- The appointed Legislative Councils are enlarged