IV

U.S. History Through a Social Justice Lens

Course Overview: U.S. History Through a Social Justice Lens

  • This course uses U.S. History as a framework to cultivate critical thinking skills and explore social justice issues.
  • The instructor believes education should play a crucial role in fostering a more just, equal, and democratic world.

The Purpose of Education

  • Traditional view: Education is a means to an end (certificate/diploma leads to employment, social mobility).
  • Limitations of a narrow focus: Learning can become passionless and shallow, potentially contributing to high dropout rates (e.g., 1 out of 4 students in the U.S.).
  • Core of social justice education: Emphasizes critical thinking, which is often lacking in American educational institutions.
  • Bell Hooks's argument: Students' passion for thinking diminishes when education prioritizes conformity and obedience.
  • Conformity education: Leads to passive, disengaged students who never experience meaningful learning.
  • Meaningful learning: Occurs when students engage in critical thinking, discovering the "who, what, when, where, and how" of things and utilizing that knowledge to determine what matters most (Hooks).
  • Developing critical consciousness: Requires self-awareness, self-determination, and a thorough analysis of one's conditions and the struggles of others.

Problem Areas in Learning History

  • Challenge: Learning history varies for each individual, there are three main on-going problem areas.
  • Eurocentric perspective: U.S. History is often taught from an upper-class and Eurocentric perspective.
  • Lack of connection to current issues: Textbooks and instructors fail to connect historical themes to students' current conditions.
  • Memorization of low-level facts: Students are often forced to memorize names, dates, and other superficial information.
  • Consequences: These issues discourage critical thinking and contribute to U.S. citizens' ignorance of their country's history.
  • National Assessment of Educational Progress finding: Only 12% of high school seniors demonstrated proficiency in U.S. history.
  • Further concern: Only 2% of that 12% could identify the social problem that Brown v. Board of Education was meant to correct.

Banking System of Education

  • Paolo Friere's argument: Memorization of low-level facts is similar to a "Banking System".
  • Teacher's role: Teachers "deposit" information into students' heads.
  • Student's role: Students are required to regurgitate that information on exams.
  • Shift in power dynamics: This course aims to shift power to students, encouraging research, analysis, questioning, argumentation, and discussion.
  • Goal: To enable students to reach higher levels of consciousness.

Challenging the Dominant Narrative

  • Most U.S. History textbooks and instructors continue to focus on the traditional dominant narrative (upper-class, Eurocentric, male).
  • Focus: History of the "victors" and "conquerors".
  • Howard Zinn's argument: Academics either lie, omit facts, or employ a quieter method of minimizing uncomfortable truths.
  • Example: Discussing Christopher Columbus, the colonization of the Americas, and the genocide of indigenous peoples.
  • Historians' approach: Presenting facts but burying them in a mass of other information, implying that mass murder is not that important.
  • Consequence: Other narratives are reduced to an inferior status.
  • Effect: Leaving the historical analysis incomplete and inaccurate.

Alternative Historical Narratives

  • Course approach: Analyzing U.S. history through a race, class, and gender perspective.
  • Focusing on marginalized voices: Enslaved Africans, poor indentured servants, exploited workers, displaced Cherokees, suffragists, draft dodgers, student activists, anti-war protesters, and immigrant labor organizers.
  • Goal: To provide a more balanced and accurate understanding of history.

Connecting History to the Present

  • Course materials and discussions: Connecting historical themes and concepts to current issues and the conditions of the student population (Laney College).
  • Making history relevant: History becomes part of the present, relevant, and meaningful.
  • Student empowerment: Students become self-aware and empowered when they see their history and experiences reflected in their learning experience.
  • Analyzing historical patterns: Students analyze historical patterns to understand their current conditions.
  • Encouraging solutions: Students are encouraged to argue solutions to critical issues.
  • Impact: Learning history begins to have profound importance.

Critical Thinking and Activism

  • Developing critical thinking skills: This approach to history allows students to develop and strengthen their critical thinking skills.
  • Activism as the end goal: Empowering the mind is not the end goal; activism is.
  • Critical consciousness: Provides the tools to make well-informed decisions and encourages active participation in society.
  • Educator's role: Not to dictate how to participate in society, but to discuss and highlight individuals, organizations, and movements that contributed to social justice and influenced radical change throughout U.S. history.