IC

Exam #3: Chapters 9-12; PSY 342




Chapter 9:


  • Field of Dependence 

    • Tendency to rely on external cues (the "field") for perception and decision-making.

      • Example: Struggling to find a shape embedded in a complex background.

      • Cultural Note: More common in collectivist cultures.

  • Field of Independence

    • Ability to separate details from surrounding context and focus on specific elements.

      • Example: Easily identifying a shape hidden in a complex image.

      • Cultural Note: More common in individualist cultures.

  • Analytic Thinking

    • Focuses on objects and their attributes, using rules and logic to understand them.

      • Example: Categorizing objects based on shape or function.

      • Cultural Link: Common in Western cultures (linked to field independence and low-context cultures).

  • Holistic Thinking

    • Focuses on context and relationships between elements.

      • Example: Understanding behavior by considering environment and relationships.

      • Cultural Link: Common in East Asian cultures (linked to field dependence and high-context cultures).

  • Taxonomic Categorization

    • Grouping items based on shared properties.

      • Example: Grouping a panda and a monkey because they’re both animals.

      • Cultural Note: Favored by analytic thinkers.

  • Thematic Categorization

    • Grouping items based on relationships or context.

      • Example: Grouping a monkey and a banana because monkeys eat bananas.

      • Cultural Note: Favored by holistic thinkers.

  • Dispositional Attribution

    • Explaining behavior by internal traits or personality.

      • Example: “He failed because he’s lazy.”

      • Cultural Link: More common in individualist cultures.

  • Situational Attribution

    • Explaining behavior by external circumstances.

      • Example: “He failed because of a family emergency.”

      • Cultural Link: More common in collectivist cultures.

  • Fundamental Attribution Error

    • Tendency to overemphasize dispositional factors and underestimate situational ones when explaining others’ behavior.

      • Example: Assuming someone is rude without considering they had a bad day.

      • Cultural Insight: More prevalent in individualist (low-context) cultures.

  • High Context Culture

    • Relies heavily on implicit communication, shared experiences, and nonverbal cues.

      • Example: Japan, where meaning often depends on context.

      • Related to: Holistic thinking and field dependence.

  • Low Context Culture

    • Relies on explicit, direct communication where everything is spelled out.

      • Example: U.S., where clarity and directness are valued.

      • Related to: Analytic thinking and field independence.

  • Language and Thought

    • Idea that language influences how we think and what we pay attention to.

      • Connection: Tied to the Whorfian Hypothesis.

  • Language and Perception

    • How language shapes how we perceive the world, including colors, time, and space.

      • Example: Some languages have more words for shades of blue, affecting how speakers perceive them.

  • Saccades

    • Rapid eye movements during visual scanning.

      • Cultural Note: Research shows Westerners tend to focus more on focal objects (analytic), while East Asians scan scenes more broadly (holistic).

  • Naive Dialecticism

    • Acceptance of contradiction and change in beliefs.

      • Example: Believing both sides of an argument can be valid.

      • Cultural Note: Common in East Asian cultures; contrasts with Western emphasis on consistency.

  • Whorfian Hypothesis of Linguistic Relativity

    • Language shapes thought and perception.

    • Strong version: Language determines thought.

    • Weak version: Language influences thought.

      • Example: Inuit languages have multiple words for snow, possibly affecting snow perception.

  • Categorical Perception

    • Tendency to perceive stimuli as belonging to distinct categories, even when differences are gradual.

      • Example: Hearing "ba" vs. "pa" as entirely different sounds.

      • Connection: Shaped by native language and tied to language-perception interaction.

Key Connections to Know:

  • Analytic vs. Holistic Thinking → connects to field (in)dependence, categorization, attribution styles, and context culture types.

  • Language and Thought/Perception → central to Whorfian Hypothesis and affects categorical perception.

  • High vs. Low Context Cultures → influence communication, thinking styles, and attributions.

  • Naive Dialecticism contrasts with Western logical consistency and ties into holistic thinking.



Chapter 10:


  • James-Lange theory of emotions

    • Emotions result from physiological reactions to events.

      • Example: "I feel afraid because my heart is racing."

      • Cultural Insight: Emotions are rooted in the body; might be interpreted differently across cultures based on attention to internal states.

  • Two-factor theory of emotions

    • Emotion arises from physical arousal plus cognitive interpretation of that arousal.

      • Example: Heart racing + seeing a bear = fear; heart racing + on a date = excitement.

      • Cultural Note: Interpretation of arousal varies by cultural norms and context.

  • Universal emotions

    • Basic emotions recognized across all cultures (e.g., happiness, sadness, anger, fear, surprise, disgust).

      • Example: People across cultures generally recognize a smile as happiness.

      • Connected to: Evolutionary psychology and cross-cultural emotion recognition studies.

  • Display rules

    • Cultural norms that dictate how, when, and where emotions should be expressed.

      • Example: In Japan, people may suppress anger in public to maintain group harmony.

      • Key Point: Emotions may be felt universally, but expressions are shaped by culture.

  • Ritualized displays of emotion

    • Culturally specific expressions of emotion that don’t occur universally.

      • Example: Embarrassment in some cultures might be shown with a hand covering the face.

      • Connection: Go beyond display rules; they’re unique expressions tied to cultural norms.

  • Emotional smoothness

    • Ideal in some East Asian cultures—emphasizes moderation and emotional balance to preserve harmony.

      • Example: Avoiding intense displays of happiness or sadness.

      • Contrasts with: Western ideal of emotional expressiveness and authenticity.

  • Subjective well-being

    • A person’s perceived happiness or life satisfaction.

      • Components: Positive emotions, low negative emotions, and life satisfaction.

      • Cultural Note: Measured and valued differently across cultures (e.g., individual achievement vs. social harmony).

  • Predictors of subjective well-being

    • Factors that influence happiness:

  • Western cultures: personal achievement, self-esteem, autonomy.

  • Eastern cultures: social harmony, fulfilling roles, low conflict.

    • Key Insight: What “makes people happy” varies depending on cultural values.


  • Ideal Affect

    • The emotional states a culture values and promotes.

      • Example:

  • U.S.: high-arousal positive states (e.g., excitement, enthusiasm).

  • East Asia: low-arousal positive states (e.g., calmness, contentment).

    • Important Link: Influences everything from emotional goals to media and parenting styles.

Key Connections to Know:

  • Display Rules, Ritualized Displays, and Emotional Smoothness → shape how universal emotions are expressed across cultures.

  • James-Lange vs. Two-Factor Theory → help explain how people interpret bodily responses, which varies with cultural context.

  • Subjective Well-Being and Ideal Affect → both influenced by cultural values (individualism vs. collectivism, arousal preferences).

  • Predictors of Well-Being differ by culture → reflecting varying emotional ideals and social goals.




Chapter 11:


  • Propinquity

    • Physical or psychological closeness increases the chance of forming relationships.

      • Example: You're more likely to become friends with someone who sits next to you in class.

      • Cultural Note: Matters more in low relational mobility cultures where long-term proximity influences ties.

  • Mere exposure

    • The more we are exposed to something or someone, the more we tend to like it.

      • Example: Liking a song more after hearing it repeatedly.

      • Cultural Insight: Reinforces propinquity in stable, close-knit communities.

  • Similarity-attraction

    • We tend to be attracted to people who are similar to us (values, beliefs, background).

      • Example: Becoming friends with someone who shares your humor or hobbies.

      • Cultural Note: Especially strong in low relational mobility cultures, where social bonds are more stable and based on similarity.

  • Communal sharing

    • Relationships where people treat each other as equals and share resources freely.

      • Example: A close-knit family or small tribe where everything is shared.

      • Cultural Link: Common in collectivist and interdependent societies.

  • Authority ranking

    • Relationships organized in a hierarchy; respect and obedience flow one way, while care and protection flow the other.

      • Example: Parent-child or boss-subordinate relationships.

      • Cultural Note: More emphasized in cultures with high power distance.

  • Equality matching

    • ​​Relationships focused on balance and equal give-and-take.

      • Example: Splitting a dinner bill equally or taking turns helping each other.

      • Cultural Insight: Seen in peer relationships, common in East Asian or egalitarian contexts.

  • High relational mobility

    • Social environments where people can freely form and leave relationships.

      • Example: In the U.S., you can make new friends often and easily.

      • Ties to: Greater focus on similarity-attraction, personal choice, and market pricing relationships.

  • Low relational mobility

    • Social environments where relationships are stable, long-lasting, and harder to change.

      • Example: A small town or workplace where social circles rarely change.

      • Leads to: More reliance on propinquity, mere exposure, and harmony.

  • Market Pricing

    • Relationships based on proportional exchange, costs, and benefits—like transactions.

      • Example: Paying someone for tutoring services.

      • Cultural Link: More common in individualist, high-relational-mobility cultures

  • Simpático

    • A cultural script emphasizing kindness, politeness, and social harmony in relationships.

      • Example: In many Latin American cultures, being warm and agreeable is socially valued, even over directness.

      • Connection: Promotes social smoothness and collective cohesion.

Key Connections to Know:

  • Propinquity, Mere Exposure, and Similarity-Attraction → help explain how relationships start and are maintained.

  • High vs. Low Relational Mobility → influences which of the above factors matter most (freedom of choice vs. maintaining harmony).

  • Fiske’s Four Relationship Models:

    • Communal Sharing

    • Authority Ranking

    • Equality Matching

    • Market Pricing → foundational for understanding how different cultures structure relationships.

  • Simpático → reflects emotional and interpersonal ideals in specific cultural contexts (e.g., Latin America).





Chapter 12:


  • Secularization Theory

    • As societies become more modern, religious influence declines.

      • Cultural Insight: Western societies have shown this trend, but it's not universal—many non-Western cultures remain highly religious.

  • Preconventional Moral Reasoning

    • Moral decisions based on personal consequences (reward/punishment).

      • Example: “Don’t steal because you’ll get in trouble.”

      • Common in: Young children; across cultures at early developmental stages.

  • Conventional Moral Reasoning

    • Moral decisions based on societal rules and social approval.

      • Example: “Don’t steal because it’s against the law.”

      • Cultural Note: Aligns with ethic of community in collectivist societies.

  •  Postconventional Moral Reasoning

    • Moral decisions based on abstract principles (justice, human rights).

      • Example: “Stealing might be wrong, but if it's to save a life, it may be justified.”

      • Cultural Note: Valued in individualistic cultures; less common globally than previously assumed.

  • Ethic of Autonomy

    • Morality focused on individual rights, freedom, and justice.

      • Example: Belief that everyone has the right to make personal choices.

      • Common in: Western, individualist cultures.

  • Ethic of Community

    • Morality based on duties, roles, and loyalty to one's group or community.

      • Example: Putting family needs before personal desires.

      • Common in: Collectivist cultures (e.g., East Asia, Latin America).

  • Ethic of Divinity

    • Morality grounded in religious or spiritual beliefs, with focus on purity, sin, and sacredness.

      • Example: Avoiding behavior considered sinful in a religion.

      • Strong in: Highly religious cultures and orthodox communities.

  • Orthodox

    • Value tradition, fixed moral codes, and authority (especially religious).

      • Example: Following scripture literally.

      • Connected to: Ethic of Divinity, Respecting Authority, Achieving Purity.

  • Progressive

    • Value change, personal experience, and reinterpretation of traditions.

      • Example: Adapting religious teachings to modern life.

      • Connected to: Ethic of Autonomy, Postconventional Reasoning.

  • Avoiding Harm

    • Core moral concern with preventing suffering or injury to others.

      • Example: Opposing violence or abuse.

      • Universal, but emphasized differently by culture.

  • Protecting Fairness

    • Concern with justice, rights, and equal treatment.

      • Example: Protesting discrimination.

      • Linked to: Ethic of Autonomy, often emphasized in Western cultures.

  • Loyalty to Ingroups

    • Valuing commitment, support, and duty to one’s group (family, nation, etc.).

      • Example: Defending your team or country no matter what.

      • Connected to: Ethic of Community, Conventional Reasoning.

  • Respecting Authority

    • Upholding social order and obeying tradition or hierarchy.

      • Example: Deferring to elders or leaders.

      • Prominent in: Collectivist cultures, and Orthodox communities.

  • Achieving Purity

    • Concern with spiritual or physical cleanliness, avoiding degradation or sin.

      • Example: Ritual washing, dietary laws.

      • Key to: Ethic of Divinity and religious moral codes.

  • Calling

    • Belief that one has a spiritual or moral duty to fulfill a specific role or career.

      • Example: Becoming a teacher or nurse out of a sense of moral purpose.

      • Rooted in: Protestant ethics; linked to religion, morality, and identity.


Key Connections to Know:

  • Three Ethics (Autonomy, Community, Divinity) → Framework for understanding moral reasoning across cultures.

  • Pre-, Conventional, Postconventional → Reflect developmental and cultural differences in moral reasoning.

  • Orthodox vs. Progressive → Reflect how religious values influence moral views (Divinity vs. Autonomy).

  • Moral Foundations (Haidt):

    • Avoiding Harm & Protecting Fairness → tie to Autonomy

    • Loyalty, Authority, Purity → tie to Community & Divinity

Calling → Can blend Divinity and Community, depending on motivation.