PSYC214 Learning and Behaviour - Week 9 Lecture_MELBOURNE
Extinction (Ch. 9)
Definition and conditions under which it occurs
Recovery from extinction
Learned extinction
Partial reinforcement effect
Aversive Control (Ch. 10)
Avoidance behavior
Punishment
Consider various contexts where behaviors might be reduced or prevented:
Personal
Public
Private
Home
School
Work
Study
Health
Acquisition: NS + US → CR
E.g., Dog salivates when bell sounds
Extinction:
When the bell rings without food, the CR diminishes.
Spontaneous Recovery:
After a break, the CR can reemerge.
Relearning:
Faster relearning of the association if previously learned.
Stimulus Generalization:
Responding to similar stimuli.
Stimulus Discrimination:
Responding only to specific stimuli.
Both classical and instrumental conditioning involve acquiring behavior.
Extinction arises when:
The US (in PC) is omitted
The reinforcing outcome (in IC) is omitted
Extinction viewed as opposite to acquisition, but raises questions:
Is it unlearning?
Is it forgetting?
Effects:
Decrease in target response
Increase in response variability
Example: Behavior similar to malfunctioning vending machines.
Extinction is not unlearning or forgetting.
Spontaneous Recovery: Reappearance of behavior indicating some retention.
Renewal: Reappearance of conditioned response when contextual cues change after extinction.
Behaviors can reappear due to:
Spontaneous Recovery: Passage of time
Renewal: Contextual change
Reinstatement: Encountering the US again.
Resurgence: After another response has been extinguished.
Involves non-reinforcement after reinforcement history.
E.g., Lever pressing no longer yields reward.
The absence of reinforcement disrupts the S-R association.
Trial Counts: More trials enhance extinction.
Distributed Learning: Spaced trials mitigate renewal.
Contextual Variation: Using multiple extinction contexts can reduce renewal.
Reminder Cues: Recalling initial extinction context reinforces behavior reduction.
Compound Stimuli: Extinguishing two behaviors simultaneously leads to stronger effects.
Behaviors reinforced on leaner schedules (partial) are more resistant to extinction than those on richer schedules (continuous).
Discrimination Hypothesis
Parallelism of extinction with partial reinforcement conditions.
Frustration Hypothesis
Lack of reinforcement creates frustration, reinforcing non-responsiveness.
Sequential Hypothesis
Response sequences during partial reinforcement shifts reinforcement signals.
Group comparisons on extinction trials yielded insights on reinforcement dynamics.
Results indicated behaviors responding predictably differed based on reinforcement types.
Definition: Making specific responses to prevent negative outcomes.
E.g., Wearing gloves to avoid injury while gardening.
Definition: Making a specific response results in a negative outcome.
Positive contingency examples include consequences like fines for illegal parking.
Study Example: Brogden et al. (1938) involving guinea pigs.
Comparing classical conditioning with avoidance conditioning techniques.
Involves two learning mechanisms:
Association of CS with US in absence of response, leading to conditioned fear.
Learning instrumental response that terminates CS and diminishes fear, reinforcing avoidance behavior.
Response Blocking: Flooding with context exposure reduces avoidance behavior.
Definition: Consequences that reduce behavior likelihood.
Types:
Positive punishment
Negative punishment
Intensity: Higher initial intensity leads to more effective punishment.
Delay: The closer to the behavior the punishment is administered, the more effective.
Contingency: Clear relationship between behavior and punishment enhances effectiveness.
Potential adverse effects include aggression, suppression of other behaviors, needing continuous monitoring, possible abuse, and ethical considerations.
Positive Punishment: Best avoided unless necessary.
Negative Punishment: Options like time-out, extinction, response cost.
Reinforcement of alternative behaviors, providing competing choices, can effectively reduce maladaptive behaviors.
Overview of extinction concepts, including recovery mechanisms and partial reinforcement effects.
Aversive control examined through avoidance behavior and punishment strategies.
Extinction (Ch. 9)
Definition and conditions under which it occurs
Recovery from extinction
Learned extinction
Partial reinforcement effect
Aversive Control (Ch. 10)
Avoidance behavior
Punishment
Consider various contexts where behaviors might be reduced or prevented:
Personal
Public
Private
Home
School
Work
Study
Health
Acquisition: NS + US → CR
E.g., Dog salivates when bell sounds
Extinction:
When the bell rings without food, the CR diminishes.
Spontaneous Recovery:
After a break, the CR can reemerge.
Relearning:
Faster relearning of the association if previously learned.
Stimulus Generalization:
Responding to similar stimuli.
Stimulus Discrimination:
Responding only to specific stimuli.
Both classical and instrumental conditioning involve acquiring behavior.
Extinction arises when:
The US (in PC) is omitted
The reinforcing outcome (in IC) is omitted
Extinction viewed as opposite to acquisition, but raises questions:
Is it unlearning?
Is it forgetting?
Effects:
Decrease in target response
Increase in response variability
Example: Behavior similar to malfunctioning vending machines.
Extinction is not unlearning or forgetting.
Spontaneous Recovery: Reappearance of behavior indicating some retention.
Renewal: Reappearance of conditioned response when contextual cues change after extinction.
Behaviors can reappear due to:
Spontaneous Recovery: Passage of time
Renewal: Contextual change
Reinstatement: Encountering the US again.
Resurgence: After another response has been extinguished.
Involves non-reinforcement after reinforcement history.
E.g., Lever pressing no longer yields reward.
The absence of reinforcement disrupts the S-R association.
Trial Counts: More trials enhance extinction.
Distributed Learning: Spaced trials mitigate renewal.
Contextual Variation: Using multiple extinction contexts can reduce renewal.
Reminder Cues: Recalling initial extinction context reinforces behavior reduction.
Compound Stimuli: Extinguishing two behaviors simultaneously leads to stronger effects.
Behaviors reinforced on leaner schedules (partial) are more resistant to extinction than those on richer schedules (continuous).
Discrimination Hypothesis
Parallelism of extinction with partial reinforcement conditions.
Frustration Hypothesis
Lack of reinforcement creates frustration, reinforcing non-responsiveness.
Sequential Hypothesis
Response sequences during partial reinforcement shifts reinforcement signals.
Group comparisons on extinction trials yielded insights on reinforcement dynamics.
Results indicated behaviors responding predictably differed based on reinforcement types.
Definition: Making specific responses to prevent negative outcomes.
E.g., Wearing gloves to avoid injury while gardening.
Definition: Making a specific response results in a negative outcome.
Positive contingency examples include consequences like fines for illegal parking.
Study Example: Brogden et al. (1938) involving guinea pigs.
Comparing classical conditioning with avoidance conditioning techniques.
Involves two learning mechanisms:
Association of CS with US in absence of response, leading to conditioned fear.
Learning instrumental response that terminates CS and diminishes fear, reinforcing avoidance behavior.
Response Blocking: Flooding with context exposure reduces avoidance behavior.
Definition: Consequences that reduce behavior likelihood.
Types:
Positive punishment
Negative punishment
Intensity: Higher initial intensity leads to more effective punishment.
Delay: The closer to the behavior the punishment is administered, the more effective.
Contingency: Clear relationship between behavior and punishment enhances effectiveness.
Potential adverse effects include aggression, suppression of other behaviors, needing continuous monitoring, possible abuse, and ethical considerations.
Positive Punishment: Best avoided unless necessary.
Negative Punishment: Options like time-out, extinction, response cost.
Reinforcement of alternative behaviors, providing competing choices, can effectively reduce maladaptive behaviors.
Overview of extinction concepts, including recovery mechanisms and partial reinforcement effects.
Aversive control examined through avoidance behavior and punishment strategies.