Section 1: Government can interfere with rights and freedoms if justified in a free and democratic society.
Section 7: Permits government interference with life, liberty, and security of the person, provided it follows fundamental justice.
Procedural fairness is a key requirement stemming from Section 7.
Procedural fairness is a responsibility of the government.
The government has a duty to follow the Constitution.
Branches of Government:
Legislative: Parliament (federal) & Legislative Assemblies (provincial).
Executive: Prime Minister and cabinet (federal) & Premier and cabinet (provincial).
Judicial: Judges in various courts (appointed federally or provincially).
Types of Law Made:
Statute Law: Legislation from the Parliament or Legislative Assemblies.
Subordinate Legislation: Regulations made under authority of legislation.
Case Law: Developed from court decisions.
Constitution Act, 1867, and the Charter limit the supremacy of Parliament.
Sections 91 and 92 allocate powers between federal and provincial governments:
Provinces can establish rules in areas they govern.
The federal government has exclusive powers in its jurisdictions.
Judges enforce compliance with the Constitution by striking down non-compliant laws.
Judges ensure laws comply with the Constitution by:
Assessing if legislation falls within the authority of either the provincial or federal government (Sections 91 and 92).
Determining if procedural fairness and other Charter rights are upheld (e.g., Section 7).
Provincial Court: Handles less serious matters.
Supreme Court of British Columbia: Deals with more serious cases and appeals from the Provincial Court.
British Columbia Court of Appeal: Handles appeals from the Supreme Court of BC.
Supreme Court of Canada: Final court of appeal from provincial courts.
Negotiation: Parties decide on the resolution without third-party help.
Mediation: A neutral third party helps the disputing parties reach an agreement.
Arbitration: A third party makes a binding decision on the dispute.
Maintains control for the parties.
Reduces delays and distractions.
Generally, less expensive than court litigation.
Preserves goodwill between parties and keeps disputes private.
Potential for lack of judicial fairness and impartiality.
Courts can pressure parties for information more effectively.
ADR decisions may lack enforceability.
No public record of the dispute or decisions.
Trials are public; justice must be transparent.
Equal access to courts is guaranteed for all litigants.
Decision based on the balance of probabilities (more likely true than false).
Discovery: Includes document disclosure and verbal examination of witnesses.
Settlement Offer: Any party can propose a settlement to resolve the matter.
Damages: Monetary compensation can be:
General: For pain and suffering or future losses.
Special: For costs incurred before the trial.
Punitive: To punish the wrongdoer or prevent ongoing violations of rights.
Regulatory bodies operate under the executive branch, responsible for public administration.
Complaints against regulators are typically handled by administrative tribunals (e.g., Labour boards, Human Rights commissions).
Tribunal decisions can be reviewed by courts for:
Procedural fairness compliance.
Adherence to jurisdictional limits.
Derived from Section 7 of the Charter, rules include:
Advance notice of decisions.
Opportunity for individuals to present their case before decisions are finalized.
Decisions must be made by impartial decision-makers.
Assault: Actions creating apprehension of imminent harmful contact.
Battery: Intentional unwanted physical contact does not require intent to harm.
Intent must originate from the person’s conscious mind.
Elements include:
A defamatory statement affecting the reputation.
Reference to the plaintiff and publication to a third party.
Innuendo: Contextual meaning may suffice for defamation beyond literal interpretation.
Justification: Truth is a defence against defamation claims.
Qualified/Absolute Privilege: Certain communications are privileged in specific contexts.
Fair Comment: Opinions on public interest content may not be defamatory.
Interference with use/enjoyment of property or damage to another’s property.
Substantial & unreasonable interference criteria include noise, pollution, etc.
Trespass to Chattels: Physical interference with someone else’s goods.
Conversion: Intentional appropriation of goods for personal use, includes theft.
Detinue: Wrongful possession of goods where return is refused.
Unlawful and intentional constraint on a person's freedom.
Duty of Care: Did the plaintiff owe the defendant a duty?
Standard of Care: Was the standard of care met?
Causation: Was there a direct link between actions and injuries?
Remoteness of Damages: Were the damages predictable and not too remote?
Voluntary Assumption of Risk: The plaintiff knowingly accepts risks.
Contributory Negligence: Responsibility shared based on fault.
Illegality: If the plaintiff was engaged in illegal activity, their claim may be barred.
Consensus: Must include an offer and acceptance without new terms.
Consideration: Both parties must provide value in the agreement.
Offers can be revoked, but must be communicated unless an option contract exists.
Invitations to treat are not valid offers.
Must involve something of value, excludes prior obligations.
New obligations introduced in modifications must also be supported by consideration.