Stark and Bainbridge on Religion

Stark and Bainbridge:

  • Suggested that secularisation was a European phenomenon and that religious belief was strong in the rest of the world.

  • Religion is universal as people need religion to fulfil their basic needs.

  • Proposed a religious market theory based upon the needs of humans.

  • According to Stark and Bainbridge, religion continued to be important in people's lives.

  • Constant need for religious belief in people's lives due to the functions it fulfils.

  • Humans look to receive rewards and minimise the costs to them personally.

Religious Compensation:

  • Religion compensates individuals when they are unable to fulfil their needs.

  • Meets supernatural needs to explain what is inexplicable in life.

  • Promises rewards for those that are virtuous, even when society fails to reward people in this way.

Religious Market Theory:

  • Religion operates in a similar way to the economic markets.

  • As older religions and beliefs fade, new forms of belief arise, continually evolving to meet individual needs.

  • Religious organisations compete with one another in a crowded global marketplace leading to improvements in the services that religion can offer.

  • Competition brings more choice and innovation.

  • Secularisation in Europe is a result of dominant one-religion states.

  • The USA and other areas of the world have more choice in beliefs, thus can provide for different needs.

Evaluating Religious Market Theory:

  • Greater diversity in a global era is evidenced by other sociologists, e.g. Berger.

  • Higher levels of attendance in the USA, but still a long-term decline over time.

  • Some European nations have high levels of church attendance, despite having one dominant religion.

  • Alternative forms of belief meet the needs of individuals rather than religious diversity.

Compensation for deprivation:

  • Glock and Stark (1969) and Stark and Bambridge (1985) – women  participate in religion because of:

    • Organismic deprivation – more likely to suffer from ill physical and mental health problems and thus seek healing through religion

    • Ethical deprivation – Women tend to be more morally conservative and, thus, attracted to sects

    • Social deprivation – more likely to be poor and seek compensation in religion

robot