knowt logo

Civil Rights

  • Protections against the government

  • Civil rights reflect

    • Who can partcipate

    • How they can participate

    • How much they can participate

  • Civil rights reflect government’s collective decisions on the treatment of individuals

The Equal Protection Clause

  • 14th Amendment

  • “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall… deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”

  • Protection for a person rather than a citizen

Guidelines for Civil Rights

  • Evolved throughout history

    • Universal

    • Equal

  • Residency— who gets to be here?

  • Political— who gets to participate?

  • Legal— due process

  • Others— Property, education, healthcare

Plessy v Ferguson

  • “Separate but equal”

  • Established Jim Crow laws as legal

  • 14th Amendment did not abolish segregation

Brown v Board of Education

  • In the field of education, separate but equal is inherently unequal

  • Initially started out as only for desegregating schools, spread over time

  • Problems:

    • Local officials had to enforce Brown and would delay in doing so

    • Brown only attacked de jure segregation (segregation by law), not de facto segregation (customary/private segregation)

    • Brown did not directly address discrimination in employment, voting, etc.

  • Brown gave the SCOTUS a lot of moral capital but did little initial change

Civil Rights Act of 1964

  • Segregation on the grounds of race, religion, or national origin was banned in all public places

  • Barred race, religious, national origin, or gender discrimination by employers and unions

  • Created Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

The Right to Vote

  • The right to vote is not included in the Constitution

  • Initially, states restricted voting based on religion, property, gender, and race

  • Voting Rights Act of 1965

Continued Challenges

  • Voter ID

  • Voter roles purged after someone does not vote for a long time

  • Shelby County v. Holder— “Preclearance” removed requiring states with past history of voter suppression to have voting changes approved by the federal government

Discrimination in Employment

  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

  • Fair Pay Act of 2009 (Ledbetter case)

    • Equal pay for male and female employees

  • ERA— Equal Rights Amendment

    • Originally didn’t pass— 3 states short

    • Expiration date passed

    • 38th state ratified after the expiration date

    • Currently in question of whether or not it should be an amendment

  • Intermediate Scrutiny

    • Gov has a substantial/important interest in a narrowly tailored way

    • Connected to gender/sex

    • Different from strict scrutiny, easier for the government to prove its case

Title IX of the 1972 Education Act

  • No person in the US can be denied participation in education programs or activities based on sex or gender

  • Increased girls’ participation in sports

Expansion of Civil Rights

  • Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990

    • More accessible public and private spaces for people with disabilities

    • Equal employment rights

    • Equal access

  • LGBTQ+ rights

    • DOMA (1996)— marriage is between one man and one woman

    • Don’t Ask Don’t Tell (1994)— the military could discharge people for being openly gay, but closeted people could

    • Lawrence v. Texas (2003)— two consenting adults engaging in sexual activity in the home is not the business of the government

    • United States v. Windsor (2013)— Windsor’s wife died but she was unable to inherit without paying taxes, sued because if her spouse was male she wouldn’t have had to

    • Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)— 🙂

    • Bostick v. Clayton (2020)— trans woman fired after transitioning, sued for discrimination and won

  • Native American Civil Rights Movement

Affirmative Action

  • University of CA v Bakke

  • Gratz v Bollinger

  • Grutter v Bollinger

  • Students for Fair Admissions v Harvard (2023)

  • Students for Fair Admissions v UNC (2023)

P

Civil Rights

  • Protections against the government

  • Civil rights reflect

    • Who can partcipate

    • How they can participate

    • How much they can participate

  • Civil rights reflect government’s collective decisions on the treatment of individuals

The Equal Protection Clause

  • 14th Amendment

  • “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall… deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”

  • Protection for a person rather than a citizen

Guidelines for Civil Rights

  • Evolved throughout history

    • Universal

    • Equal

  • Residency— who gets to be here?

  • Political— who gets to participate?

  • Legal— due process

  • Others— Property, education, healthcare

Plessy v Ferguson

  • “Separate but equal”

  • Established Jim Crow laws as legal

  • 14th Amendment did not abolish segregation

Brown v Board of Education

  • In the field of education, separate but equal is inherently unequal

  • Initially started out as only for desegregating schools, spread over time

  • Problems:

    • Local officials had to enforce Brown and would delay in doing so

    • Brown only attacked de jure segregation (segregation by law), not de facto segregation (customary/private segregation)

    • Brown did not directly address discrimination in employment, voting, etc.

  • Brown gave the SCOTUS a lot of moral capital but did little initial change

Civil Rights Act of 1964

  • Segregation on the grounds of race, religion, or national origin was banned in all public places

  • Barred race, religious, national origin, or gender discrimination by employers and unions

  • Created Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

The Right to Vote

  • The right to vote is not included in the Constitution

  • Initially, states restricted voting based on religion, property, gender, and race

  • Voting Rights Act of 1965

Continued Challenges

  • Voter ID

  • Voter roles purged after someone does not vote for a long time

  • Shelby County v. Holder— “Preclearance” removed requiring states with past history of voter suppression to have voting changes approved by the federal government

Discrimination in Employment

  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

  • Fair Pay Act of 2009 (Ledbetter case)

    • Equal pay for male and female employees

  • ERA— Equal Rights Amendment

    • Originally didn’t pass— 3 states short

    • Expiration date passed

    • 38th state ratified after the expiration date

    • Currently in question of whether or not it should be an amendment

  • Intermediate Scrutiny

    • Gov has a substantial/important interest in a narrowly tailored way

    • Connected to gender/sex

    • Different from strict scrutiny, easier for the government to prove its case

Title IX of the 1972 Education Act

  • No person in the US can be denied participation in education programs or activities based on sex or gender

  • Increased girls’ participation in sports

Expansion of Civil Rights

  • Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990

    • More accessible public and private spaces for people with disabilities

    • Equal employment rights

    • Equal access

  • LGBTQ+ rights

    • DOMA (1996)— marriage is between one man and one woman

    • Don’t Ask Don’t Tell (1994)— the military could discharge people for being openly gay, but closeted people could

    • Lawrence v. Texas (2003)— two consenting adults engaging in sexual activity in the home is not the business of the government

    • United States v. Windsor (2013)— Windsor’s wife died but she was unable to inherit without paying taxes, sued because if her spouse was male she wouldn’t have had to

    • Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)— 🙂

    • Bostick v. Clayton (2020)— trans woman fired after transitioning, sued for discrimination and won

  • Native American Civil Rights Movement

Affirmative Action

  • University of CA v Bakke

  • Gratz v Bollinger

  • Grutter v Bollinger

  • Students for Fair Admissions v Harvard (2023)

  • Students for Fair Admissions v UNC (2023)