knowt logo

4.3.2 Human Activity and River Landscapes

Human Activity & Storm Hydrographs

  • There are many human activities which change the river landscape

  • This impacts on the storm hydrograph, changing the lag time and discharge 

Human Factors Affecting Storm Hydrographs

Human Factors

 Impact

Effect on Hydrograph

Deforestation

Lack of trees reduces interception and infiltration, increasing overland flow

  • Discharge ↑

  • Lag time ↓

Afforestation

An increased amount of trees increases interception and infiltration reducing overland flow 

  • Discharge ↓

  • Lag time ↑

River management

Dams can be used to control the level of discharge downstream

  • Discharge ↓

  • Lag time ↑

Urbanisation

Impermeable concrete and tarmac increase overland flow 

Water flows into the drains reaching the river rapidly

  • Discharge ↑

  • Lag time ↓

Agriculture

Bare soil and ploughing increase overland flow, especially where ploughing is downslope

Replacement of pasture (grassland) with arable crops also increases overland flow

  • Discharge ↑

  • Lag time ↓

Climate change

Rising global temperatures may increase storm frequency and intensity, increasing precipitation 

Increasing drought which leads to baked soil and periods of extreme cold which freeze the soil which means that water cannot infiltrate

  • Discharge ↑

  • Lag time ↓

  • Deforestation, urbanisation and agriculture all increase the overland flow 

  • Overland flow reaches the river more rapidly than through flow or groundwater flow

    • This means that the lag time is reduced

  • They also increase the amount of water which reaches the river 

    • This increases the level of discharge leading to a steep rising limb

  • The combination of these factors leads to a storm hydrograph which has a rapid response to a rainfall or storm event

  • Afforestation increases the time the lag time and increases infiltration so less water will reach the river

urban-rural-hydrograph-comparison

Image showing comparison between urban and rural hydrography 

Worked example

Explain two ways in which human activities can affect storm hydrographs

(4 marks)

  • You will not be awarded marks if you make a point and then for the second part write the opposite. For example, you might refer to deforestation increasing discharge and decreasing the lag time. If you then write about afforestation decreasing discharge and increasing the lag time, you will only be awarded 2 marks

Answer:

  • More urbanisation (1) increases rates of run-off (or equivalent idea e.g. reduces infiltration) and/or more water in the river/higher discharge (1)

  • Changing agricultural practices/ land use (1) such as ploughing land previously left in grass which will increase runoff (1)

  • Deforestation/Afforestation (1) affects interception and infiltration rates so changing run-off and thus lag-times (1)

  • Climate change my increase/decrease storminess (1) which will affect lag-times because of changes in infiltration/run off relationships (1)

  • Human management of rivers e.g. levees (1) maintains more water in the channel (1)

Exam Tip

In 4 mark answers take care to not simply write the opposite for the second set of two marks. If you do this you are not showing the breadth of knowledge expected and will only be awarded marks for the first part of your answer. See the above worked example which illustrates where this could happen.

Case Study: River Ouse, York

  • York is a city located in the north of England

    • The city's population is just over 200,000

  • York regularly floods: Serious flooding has occurred in 1947, 1978, 1991, 1995, 2000 and 2015

  • The floods in 2000 were the worst on record 

    • The Ouse rose almost 5.4 meters above its normal level

    • 540 properties were flooded and 320 were at serious risk

    • 18,700 hectares of farmland were affected

    • The overall cost of the floods was estimated to be over £12 million including lost income from tourism

Causes of 2015 flood

Physical and Human Causes of 2015 Flood

Physical Causes 

Human Causes 

Before reaching York the Ouse is joined by a number of large tributaries (Swale, Ure and Nidd) which flow from the Yorkshire Dales

Farming in the Vale of York and grazing in the Yorkshire Dales means interception is reduced due to decreased tree cover and lack of other vegetation

Annual precipitation levels in the Yorkshire Dales are between 600-1000mm. In 2010 one month's rain fell in just 24 hours

Increased urbanisation around the city with new housing developments, retail parks and industrial areas have increased impermeable surfaces

Yorkshire Dales are upland areas with steep slopes

Erosion of peat in upland areas reduces the amount of moisture held in the soil

Land around York is low-lying and flat

Failure of the Foss Barrier increased flooding in the east of the city

York lies on the confluence of the rivers Foss and Ouse

Deforestation in upland areas 


C

4.3.2 Human Activity and River Landscapes

Human Activity & Storm Hydrographs

  • There are many human activities which change the river landscape

  • This impacts on the storm hydrograph, changing the lag time and discharge 

Human Factors Affecting Storm Hydrographs

Human Factors

 Impact

Effect on Hydrograph

Deforestation

Lack of trees reduces interception and infiltration, increasing overland flow

  • Discharge ↑

  • Lag time ↓

Afforestation

An increased amount of trees increases interception and infiltration reducing overland flow 

  • Discharge ↓

  • Lag time ↑

River management

Dams can be used to control the level of discharge downstream

  • Discharge ↓

  • Lag time ↑

Urbanisation

Impermeable concrete and tarmac increase overland flow 

Water flows into the drains reaching the river rapidly

  • Discharge ↑

  • Lag time ↓

Agriculture

Bare soil and ploughing increase overland flow, especially where ploughing is downslope

Replacement of pasture (grassland) with arable crops also increases overland flow

  • Discharge ↑

  • Lag time ↓

Climate change

Rising global temperatures may increase storm frequency and intensity, increasing precipitation 

Increasing drought which leads to baked soil and periods of extreme cold which freeze the soil which means that water cannot infiltrate

  • Discharge ↑

  • Lag time ↓

  • Deforestation, urbanisation and agriculture all increase the overland flow 

  • Overland flow reaches the river more rapidly than through flow or groundwater flow

    • This means that the lag time is reduced

  • They also increase the amount of water which reaches the river 

    • This increases the level of discharge leading to a steep rising limb

  • The combination of these factors leads to a storm hydrograph which has a rapid response to a rainfall or storm event

  • Afforestation increases the time the lag time and increases infiltration so less water will reach the river

urban-rural-hydrograph-comparison

Image showing comparison between urban and rural hydrography 

Worked example

Explain two ways in which human activities can affect storm hydrographs

(4 marks)

  • You will not be awarded marks if you make a point and then for the second part write the opposite. For example, you might refer to deforestation increasing discharge and decreasing the lag time. If you then write about afforestation decreasing discharge and increasing the lag time, you will only be awarded 2 marks

Answer:

  • More urbanisation (1) increases rates of run-off (or equivalent idea e.g. reduces infiltration) and/or more water in the river/higher discharge (1)

  • Changing agricultural practices/ land use (1) such as ploughing land previously left in grass which will increase runoff (1)

  • Deforestation/Afforestation (1) affects interception and infiltration rates so changing run-off and thus lag-times (1)

  • Climate change my increase/decrease storminess (1) which will affect lag-times because of changes in infiltration/run off relationships (1)

  • Human management of rivers e.g. levees (1) maintains more water in the channel (1)

Exam Tip

In 4 mark answers take care to not simply write the opposite for the second set of two marks. If you do this you are not showing the breadth of knowledge expected and will only be awarded marks for the first part of your answer. See the above worked example which illustrates where this could happen.

Case Study: River Ouse, York

  • York is a city located in the north of England

    • The city's population is just over 200,000

  • York regularly floods: Serious flooding has occurred in 1947, 1978, 1991, 1995, 2000 and 2015

  • The floods in 2000 were the worst on record 

    • The Ouse rose almost 5.4 meters above its normal level

    • 540 properties were flooded and 320 were at serious risk

    • 18,700 hectares of farmland were affected

    • The overall cost of the floods was estimated to be over £12 million including lost income from tourism

Causes of 2015 flood

Physical and Human Causes of 2015 Flood

Physical Causes 

Human Causes 

Before reaching York the Ouse is joined by a number of large tributaries (Swale, Ure and Nidd) which flow from the Yorkshire Dales

Farming in the Vale of York and grazing in the Yorkshire Dales means interception is reduced due to decreased tree cover and lack of other vegetation

Annual precipitation levels in the Yorkshire Dales are between 600-1000mm. In 2010 one month's rain fell in just 24 hours

Increased urbanisation around the city with new housing developments, retail parks and industrial areas have increased impermeable surfaces

Yorkshire Dales are upland areas with steep slopes

Erosion of peat in upland areas reduces the amount of moisture held in the soil

Land around York is low-lying and flat

Failure of the Foss Barrier increased flooding in the east of the city

York lies on the confluence of the rivers Foss and Ouse

Deforestation in upland areas 


robot