Citizen Participation

Objectives
  • [ ] Citizen Behavior
  • [ ] Liberal Democracy
  • [ ] Participatory Democracy
  • [ ] Arguments for Indirect Democracy
  • [ ] Arguments for Direct Democracy
  • [ ] Phenomenon of Democracy

Citizen Participation

  • This is a fundamental theme central in the realm of politics and democracy.
  • Another conception of democracy that has survived throughout contemporary (and liberal) democracies.   * There is a necessity for citizens to be naturally interested in politics.   * Assumptions of the task in intervening with decisions that regard public issues.
  • This overlaps with political participation.   * There is a focus on the active behavior of citizens in the political sphere.
  • Types of citizen behavior:   * Protest participation: Actions such as social lobbying in political settings   * Social participation: Public hearings and surveys hosted by and involving citizens   * Electoral participation: The act of campaigning for preferred political candidates and voting   * Obligatory participation: The paying of taxes and performing of mandated role

Liberal democracy

  • This is a constitution of bodies made up of specialized representatives.
  • Based on formal equality; one head is equated to one vote.
  • Often bureaucratized, with prioritization in decision making.

Participatory Democracy

  • Related to direct democracy.   * Insists on the necessity of bringing decisions as close to the people as possible.
  • Posits strong constraints on the principle of delegation.   * This is seen as an instrument of oligarchic power.
  • Underlines the need to create the conditions for real equality.

Arguments of indirect democracy (representative)

  • People are too passionate and selfish, or too passive and apathetic.
  • Citizens cannot be expected to be responsible for every public sector decision.   * They lack the time and knowledge.
  • Citizens lack ‘rationality’ to participate directly.   * “What will I gain from this act of participation that I would not gain if I fail to act?”
  • The size and complexity of the public sector make direct participation unrealistic.   * Technical, political, and administrative skills are needed to manage public affairs effectively - many citizens do not possess such skills.

Arguments of direct democracy (participatory)

  • The more citizens participate (individually and collectively) in increasing number of arenas, the more citizens are likely to become more capable.
  • Direct citizen participation leads towards better decision making.   * It facilitates social stability by developing a sense of community.
  • Participation increases collective decision.   * The idea of making and promoting acceptance and respect towards the governance process.
  • This is essential for the ongoing development of democratic values and skills among individuals.   * Groups and communities are a necessary condition for (and a likely outcome of) success in collaborative governance.

Power asymmetry and the double-faced phenomenon of democracy

  • Liberal democracy, despite its rhetoric and conception of free and equal citizens, cannot remedy or neutralize real power asymmetries.
  • To fight inequalities (and their delegitimizing effects), greater transparency in the functioning of public - both representative and otherwise - institutions is thus called for along with the democratization of societal institutions.   * The involvement of citizens must be continuous and direct, widening towards a capacity to intervene in all the different areas of a person’s everyday existence.
  • The democratization of parties and associations is considered particularly important, as these mediate between society and state.

\