Citizen Participation
Objectives
- [ ] Citizen Behavior
- [ ] Liberal Democracy
- [ ] Participatory Democracy
- [ ] Arguments for Indirect Democracy
- [ ] Arguments for Direct Democracy
- [ ] Phenomenon of Democracy
Citizen Participation
- This is a fundamental theme central in the realm of politics and democracy.
- Another conception of democracy that has survived throughout contemporary (and liberal) democracies. * There is a necessity for citizens to be naturally interested in politics. * Assumptions of the task in intervening with decisions that regard public issues.
- This overlaps with political participation. * There is a focus on the active behavior of citizens in the political sphere.
- Types of citizen behavior: * Protest participation: Actions such as social lobbying in political settings * Social participation: Public hearings and surveys hosted by and involving citizens * Electoral participation: The act of campaigning for preferred political candidates and voting * Obligatory participation: The paying of taxes and performing of mandated role
Liberal democracy
- This is a constitution of bodies made up of specialized representatives.
- Based on formal equality; one head is equated to one vote.
- Often bureaucratized, with prioritization in decision making.
Participatory Democracy
- Related to direct democracy. * Insists on the necessity of bringing decisions as close to the people as possible.
- Posits strong constraints on the principle of delegation. * This is seen as an instrument of oligarchic power.
- Underlines the need to create the conditions for real equality.
Arguments of indirect democracy (representative)
- People are too passionate and selfish, or too passive and apathetic.
- Citizens cannot be expected to be responsible for every public sector decision. * They lack the time and knowledge.
- Citizens lack ‘rationality’ to participate directly. * “What will I gain from this act of participation that I would not gain if I fail to act?”
- The size and complexity of the public sector make direct participation unrealistic. * Technical, political, and administrative skills are needed to manage public affairs effectively - many citizens do not possess such skills.
Arguments of direct democracy (participatory)
- The more citizens participate (individually and collectively) in increasing number of arenas, the more citizens are likely to become more capable.
- Direct citizen participation leads towards better decision making. * It facilitates social stability by developing a sense of community.
- Participation increases collective decision. * The idea of making and promoting acceptance and respect towards the governance process.
- This is essential for the ongoing development of democratic values and skills among individuals. * Groups and communities are a necessary condition for (and a likely outcome of) success in collaborative governance.
Power asymmetry and the double-faced phenomenon of democracy
- Liberal democracy, despite its rhetoric and conception of free and equal citizens, cannot remedy or neutralize real power asymmetries.
- To fight inequalities (and their delegitimizing effects), greater transparency in the functioning of public - both representative and otherwise - institutions is thus called for along with the democratization of societal institutions. * The involvement of citizens must be continuous and direct, widening towards a capacity to intervene in all the different areas of a person’s everyday existence.
- The democratization of parties and associations is considered particularly important, as these mediate between society and state.
\