Rational responses to climate change ā weighing the real costs, risks, and responses, with a healthy dose of economic and geopolitical skepticism.
Moderator: Bill Whelan (Hoover Distinguished Policy Fellow)
Guests:
Bjorn Lomborg (President, Copenhagen Consensus Center)
Neil Ferguson (Historian, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow)
John Cochrane (Economist, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow)
Unusual weather patterns (hail in California, snow in LA, dry Alps) trigger anxiety, but these alone donāt confirm long-term climate trends.
People notice anomalies but ignore regular patternsācreating biased impressions.
Extreme events are often misattributed to climate change without sufficient evidence.
Media coverage and elite discourse create a climate of alarmism.
Hyperbolic language (āatmospheric rivers,ā āpolar bombsā) is common, inflating fear.
Young people are especially affected, with rising climate anxiety and reluctance to have children due to doomsday fears.
According to Nobel laureate William Nordhaus and others, estimated climate damages by 2100 are around 5% of GDP.
In contrast, the cost of net-zero policies today may exceed that, often poorly implemented with inefficiencies and redundant mandates.
Economic modeling suggests we should aim for cost-effective, balanced policy, not extreme interventions.
Climate change dominates elite discourse, but pandemics, nuclear conflict, and natural disasters (like earthquakes) often pose more immediate and deadly risks.
The COVID pandemic likely caused more damage than 50 years of projected climate change.
Earthquake deaths in Turkey and Syria were vastly higher than recent climate-related events.
The developing worldās biggest challenges include poverty, poor infrastructure, pollution, and lack of basic servicesānot temperature changes.
Preventing fossil fuel development in Africa and Asia may hamper their growth, keeping people in poverty under the banner of environmentalism.
Rich countries telling poor countries to āstay poor for the planetā is seen as deeply unjust.
As global wealth increases, resilience to climate events improves.
Climate-related deaths have dropped 99% since the 1920s.
Investing in infrastructure, education, and healthcare may do more for global well-being than aggressive climate policy.
The core message: focus on prosperity and smart adaptation, rather than fear-based overcorrection.
āIf you prosper, youāre much more likely to be resilient toward many different impactsānot just from climate.ā ā Bjorn Lomborg
āExtreme weather is not proof of catastrophe. Itās often just weather.ā ā Neil Ferguson
āWeāre saying to the poor world: you must stay this ridiculously poor for the next 100 yearsāin the name of climate.ā ā John Cochrane
Cautionary but constructive ā the panelists advocate for a measured, data-driven, and economically sound approach to climate policy.
Emphasizes the importance of tradeoffs, and warns against panic-driven decision-making.