The Declaration of Independence highlights the commitment to protecting the rights of the people from a power-hungry government.
Definition: Substantive due process ensures the government has an adequate reason for taking away a person's life, liberty, or property.
Purpose: It promises laws will be reasonable and not arbitrary.
Fifth Amendment: Applies due process requirements to the federal government.
Fourteenth Amendment: Extends due process requirements to state and local governments, especially after the Civil War.
Application: Usually a substantive due process matter if a law limits the liberty of all persons to engage in some activity.
Purpose: Used to determine the appropriateness of government actions that limit liberty.
Types:
Rational Basis Review
Strict Scrutiny
Standard: A government action is upheld unless a challenger shows it's not rationally related to any legitimate purpose.
Burden of Proof: The challenger bears a heavy burden.
Outcome: Most laws survive this review.
Standard: The government must show its action is necessary to achieve a compelling government purpose.
Burden of Proof: The government has a hefty burden.
Requirements: Even with a critical goal, the action fails if there's a less burdensome way to accomplish it.
Outcome: It's rare for a law to pass this inquiry.
Condition: Applies when a fundamental liberty is at stake.
Rationale: Ensures closer examination of laws that threaten cherished liberties.
Condition: Applies when no fundamental right is at stake.
Level of Scrutiny: Laws affecting economic rights get rational basis review.
Outcome: The government usually wins challenges based on substantive due process.
Constitutional Protection: The constitution provides minimal protection for economic liberties.
Trigger: Fundamental rights trigger strict scrutiny.
Source: The U.S. Supreme Court found the right to be implicitly included.
Scope: It encompasses specific liberties.
The Right to Marry: Strict scrutiny applies if a state tries to dictate whom you can or cannot marry.
Example: Laws prohibiting interracial marriage violate substantive due process protections.
Example: Laws preventing marriage to an eight-year-old is necessary for compelling reasons.
The Right to Procreate (making babies).
The Right to Purchase and Use Contraceptives.
The Right to Custody of One's Children: It's difficult for the government to take away someone's kids.
The Right to Keep the Family Together: including the right to live with extended family.
Other Parental Rights: Mainly the right to control the upbringing of one's children.
Example: Deciding not to allow visits from an aunt or bringing a child to religious services weekly.
The Right to Refuse Medical Treatment: SCOTUS has not stated what level of scrutiny applies.
The Right to Engage in Consensual Sexual Activity: SCOTUS has said the government has no legitimate interest if the activity isn't commercial; so it needs to pass rational basis at the very least.
SCOTUS Ruling: There is no fundamental right to an abortion.
State Legislation: States legislate on the matter, and their legislation need only pass the rational basis test.
The Right to Vote: Strict scrutiny applies.
Example: A city refusing to let people vote unless they've paid local taxes is subject to strict scrutiny, and the law will probably fail.
The Right to Interstate Travel: Traveling abroad is not a fundamental right.
First Amendment Freedoms: Freedom of speech and religious freedoms.
***Special Standard as a fundamental right: This right is fundamental but has its own special test.
Test: If a regulation burdens the right to keep and bear arms, the government must show the regulation is “consistent with the country's historical tradition” of firearm regulation.
SCOTUS Interpretations:
People have a right to have handguns in their home for protection.
The government can't require people to have a special safety need to carry a concealed weapon.
It's okay to restrict guns in sensitive places like courtrooms or churches.
Members of a county militia can muster with their muskets in a town square.
The Right to Be a Lawyer: There's no fundamental right to be a lawyer, so having to take the bar exam is all good as far as substantive due process is concerned.