Ch2Appendix6USCOP
NEPA Application: NEPA applies to federal actions affecting the environment in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).
Court Findings:
LWAD (Low Frequency Active Sonar) planning is not subject to NEPA review.
Individual LWAD sea tests are federal actions subject to NEPA requirements.
Scope of the Chapter:
Discusses international, national, and state marine boundaries and authorities for ocean and coastal resource management.
Covers areas: Great Lakes, coastal waters, high seas, estuaries, beaches, coastal zones, offshore federal waters.
Management of coastal areas influenced by a mix of local, state, and federal laws.
Key federal laws affecting coastal management include:
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
Clean Water Act
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Oil Pollution Act
Marine Mammal Protection Act
Endangered Species Act
Readers directed to related chapters for detail on pollution and oil/gas development.
Background:
Established in response to population growth and coastal resource degradation.
Aims to preserve, protect, and enhance coastal resources for future generations.
Partnership Model:
Encourages voluntary federal-state partnerships balancing conservation and development.
Administered by NOAA, providing incentives and consistency authority for states' coastal programs.
State Responsibilities under CZMA:
Address natural and cultural resource protection, hazard mitigation, prioritizing coast-dependent uses, public access, and water quality improvement.
National Estuarine Research Reserve System:
Established for long-term ecological research and education; areas designated by state governors with NOAA oversight.
Major Amendments:
1976 amendments focused on coastal development and energy facility siting post-oil crisis.
1980 modifications emphasized state implementation of national interests in coastal planning.
1990 amendments clarified federal consistency provisions, allowing states to assert policies on federal activities.
Introduction of a grant program to enhance coastal management concerning wetlands and energy facility siting.
1996 revisions were minor with no substantive changes.
Established NFIP to combat flooding in coastal areas through federal building standards and incentives.
FEMA administers the program, offering insurance for compliant communities.
Consequences of Non-compliance: Federal assistance denied for non-participating communities; stricter state/local regulations encouraged.
Implemented to minimize federal expenditure and ecological damage from coastal barriers.
Established the CBRS to discourage development through restricted federal assistance.
Maps of designated areas are updated every five years based on land changes.
States implement federal coastal management via individual programs, addressing diverse issues.
States have primary jurisdiction over land use, which is crucial for implementing coastal programs.
99% of marine and Great Lakes coasts governed by state programs; only Illinois lacks federal approval.
Section 307: Federal actions affecting coastal zone land or resources must align with state policies.
All federal agency activities that foreseeably affect coastal environments are subject to state consistency reviews.
Effects Test: Every federal activity must determine case-by-case impacts on coastal resources.
Federal licenses or permits must be accompanied by a state consistency certification to verify adherence to state policies.
Secretarial Appeals Process: Allows for overrides of state objections based on national interest or compliance with CZMA objectives.
Sensitive coastal areas prone to erosion and environmental degradation require careful regulation.
Regulatory methods include withholding funding for developments in sensitive areas and direct growth controls.
Takings clause restricts government property acquisition without compensation; regulations affecting property must consider economic viability.
Case laws shape the understanding of when property regulations constitute a taking.
Coastal development limits available public beach access despite the trust doctrine governing the wet sand area.
States encouraged to legislate public access routes; conditions on development permits may challenge property rights.
NEPA Application: NEPA applies to federal actions affecting the environment in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).
Court Findings:
LWAD (Low Frequency Active Sonar) planning is not subject to NEPA review.
Individual LWAD sea tests are federal actions subject to NEPA requirements.
Scope of the Chapter:
Discusses international, national, and state marine boundaries and authorities for ocean and coastal resource management.
Covers areas: Great Lakes, coastal waters, high seas, estuaries, beaches, coastal zones, offshore federal waters.
Management of coastal areas influenced by a mix of local, state, and federal laws.
Key federal laws affecting coastal management include:
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
Clean Water Act
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Oil Pollution Act
Marine Mammal Protection Act
Endangered Species Act
Readers directed to related chapters for detail on pollution and oil/gas development.
Background:
Established in response to population growth and coastal resource degradation.
Aims to preserve, protect, and enhance coastal resources for future generations.
Partnership Model:
Encourages voluntary federal-state partnerships balancing conservation and development.
Administered by NOAA, providing incentives and consistency authority for states' coastal programs.
State Responsibilities under CZMA:
Address natural and cultural resource protection, hazard mitigation, prioritizing coast-dependent uses, public access, and water quality improvement.
National Estuarine Research Reserve System:
Established for long-term ecological research and education; areas designated by state governors with NOAA oversight.
Major Amendments:
1976 amendments focused on coastal development and energy facility siting post-oil crisis.
1980 modifications emphasized state implementation of national interests in coastal planning.
1990 amendments clarified federal consistency provisions, allowing states to assert policies on federal activities.
Introduction of a grant program to enhance coastal management concerning wetlands and energy facility siting.
1996 revisions were minor with no substantive changes.
Established NFIP to combat flooding in coastal areas through federal building standards and incentives.
FEMA administers the program, offering insurance for compliant communities.
Consequences of Non-compliance: Federal assistance denied for non-participating communities; stricter state/local regulations encouraged.
Implemented to minimize federal expenditure and ecological damage from coastal barriers.
Established the CBRS to discourage development through restricted federal assistance.
Maps of designated areas are updated every five years based on land changes.
States implement federal coastal management via individual programs, addressing diverse issues.
States have primary jurisdiction over land use, which is crucial for implementing coastal programs.
99% of marine and Great Lakes coasts governed by state programs; only Illinois lacks federal approval.
Section 307: Federal actions affecting coastal zone land or resources must align with state policies.
All federal agency activities that foreseeably affect coastal environments are subject to state consistency reviews.
Effects Test: Every federal activity must determine case-by-case impacts on coastal resources.
Federal licenses or permits must be accompanied by a state consistency certification to verify adherence to state policies.
Secretarial Appeals Process: Allows for overrides of state objections based on national interest or compliance with CZMA objectives.
Sensitive coastal areas prone to erosion and environmental degradation require careful regulation.
Regulatory methods include withholding funding for developments in sensitive areas and direct growth controls.
Takings clause restricts government property acquisition without compensation; regulations affecting property must consider economic viability.
Case laws shape the understanding of when property regulations constitute a taking.
Coastal development limits available public beach access despite the trust doctrine governing the wet sand area.
States encouraged to legislate public access routes; conditions on development permits may challenge property rights.