predictors_and_consequences_of__phubbing__among.6

Overview of Phubbing

  • Definition of Phubbing: Phenomenon of snubbing someone in favor of a smartphone.

  • Context: Increasing occurrence in developing countries, especially India.

Study Background

  • Research Objective: To evaluate the predictors and consequences of phubbing among adolescents and youth in India.

  • Study Duration: November 15, 2016 – May 15, 2017.

  • Participants: 400 randomly selected college students from Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh.

  • Methodology: Data collection via e-questionnaires assessing predictors and consequences of phubbing using mixed methods.

Key Findings

Prevalence of Phubbing

  • Frequency of Phubbing: 49.3% of participants reported phubbing behavior.

Predictors of Phubbing

  • Internet Addiction: Odds Ratio (OR) 2.26, significant predictor.

  • Smartphone Addiction: OR 25.9, most significant predictor.

  • Fear of Missing Out (FOMO): OR 18.8, related to high rates of phubbing.

  • Lack of Self-Control: p < 0.0001; OR 0.73–1.72 indicating variation in self-control levels.

Consequences of Phubbing

  • Significant Health Impact: Negative effects on social health, relationships, self-flourishing; linked to depression and distress.

  • Statistical Relationship: Logistic regression indicated strong correlation between predictors and consequences, especially in individuals with depression and distress status.

Implications

  • Need for Guidance: Adolescents require support from family, colleges, and government institutions to mitigate smartphone overuse and phubbing behavior.

Introduction

  • Rising Smartphone Use: Smartphones are increasingly common in developing countries, leading to concerns over their impact on youth mental health.

  • Existing Literature: Limited studies address phubbing in the Indian context, highlighting a gap in understanding this behavior.

Study Methodology

  • Ethical Approval: Required institutional approvals obtained from involved colleges.

  • Sampling Strategy: Random sampling of students from five colleges, maintaining diversity in academic disciplines.

  • Participants’ Age: Included both adolescents (10-19 years) and youth (15-29 years) as per WHO and National Youth Policy definitions.

Nonresponse and Study Validity

  • Response Rates: 20% nonresponse attributed mainly to privacy concerns and reluctance to discuss smartphone use.

  • Sample Size Justification: Final sample of 400 was determined to be adequate based on estimates of phubbing prevalence.

Analysis Techniques

  • Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis: Use of Chi-square tests, effect size calculations, and multinomial logistic regression to evaluate data.

Respondent Characteristics

  • Demographic Data: Predominantly young adults (15-29), with diverse academic backgrounds (medical, engineering, arts, etc.).

  • Social Media Usage: Whatsapp (33.5%) was a primary platform for phubbing.

Responses on Phubbing Scales

Key Findings by Scale

  1. Phubbing Scale - Notable responses:

    • "I feel incomplete without my mobile phone" (49.3%).

  2. Smartphone Addiction Scale - Key response:

    • "I am always preoccupied with my mobile phone" (49.2%).

  3. Internet Addiction Scale - Highlight:

    • "People say I spend too much time on the internet" (49.1%).

  4. Self-Control Scale - Critical insight:

    • "Unable to resist smartphone temptation" (46.9%).

  5. FOMO Scale - Major concern:

    • "Feel anxious without my smartphone" (49.2%).

Social Well-Being and Relationships

  • Impact on Relationships: Negative consequences reported on social health; 49.2% noted deteriorating family relations.

  • Self-Flourishing: 49.1% felt they could flourish despite phubbing, though it remains a concern for many.

Conclusion and Recommendations

  • Research Gap: Highlights the need for further studies on phubbing's impacts, particularly in developing regions.

  • Public Health Recommendations: Emphasizes the necessity for educational programs on responsible smartphone use among adolescents.

robot