JY

Democratic Transitions Lecture Notes

Democratic Transitions Notes

Overview

  • The document focuses on the transitions of countries towards democracy, particularly from 1946 to 2020, analyzing various factors and theories behind these transitions.

Independent Countries, Democracies, and Dictatorships (1946-2020)

  • Trend Analysis: A graph illustrates the number of independent countries categorized as democracies and dictatorships.
    • 1974: Marked the beginning of the third wave of democracy.
  • A country is classified as democratic based on DD codes.

Huntington's Waves of Democracy

  1. First Wave (1828-1926): Triggered by the American and French revolutions and ending after WWI.
  2. Second Wave (1943-1962): Included countries like Italy, West Germany, Japan, and Austria.
  3. Third Wave (1974-Present): Encompasses Greece, Spain, Portugal, parts of Latin America, and Africa.

Types of Transitions

  • Bottom-Up Transition: Initiated by the populace through revolutions to overthrow authoritarian regimes.
  • Top-Down Transition: When authoritarian elites implement liberal reforms leading to democracy.

Examples of Bottom-Up Transitions

  • East Germany (1989): Protests led to the fall of the Berlin Wall and reunification of Germany.
  • Other Notable Revolutions:
    • People Power Revolution, Philippines (1986)
    • June Resistance, South Korea (1987)
    • Velvet Revolution, Czechoslovakia (1989)
    • Orange Revolution, Ukraine (2006)
    • Jasmine Revolution, Tunisia (2011)

Factors Contributing to Bottom-Up Transitions

  • Collective Action Theory: This theory explains the challenges in organizing collective action for public goods.
    • Public Good Characteristics:
    • Nonexcludable: No one can be excluded from using it.
    • Nonrivalrous: Use by one person does not affect others.
    • Free-Rider Problem: Individuals lack incentive to participate if they believe they won’t benefit.
    • The likelihood of successful collective action increases when benefits (B) are high and participation costs (C) are low.

Collective Action Theory in Action

  • Revolutionary Thresholds: Individuals have varying thresholds for participating in protests, influenced by group dynamics.
    • Tipping Models: Suggest that as protests grow, individuals are more likely to reveal true preferences.
    • Revolutionary Cascades: Participation triggers further participation.

Preference Falsification

  • People may hide their true opinions for fear of retaliation, complicating predictions about revolutionary potential.
  • As tensions rise (e.g., poor economic conditions), public sentiments may shift, preparing ground for revolutions.

Top-Down Transitions

  • Initiated by internal conflicts among the ruling elites driven by economic crises or social unrest.
    • Liberalization Policies: Controlled openings of political systems, which may include elections and establishing judiciaries.
  • Transition Outcomes depend on the strength of opposition and the ruling elite's perceptions of that strength.
    • The document discusses play scenarios for soft-liners (elites seeking reforms) facing weak or strong opposition.

Case Study: Poland (1989)

  • Liberalization policies led to significant reforms, culminating in Solidarity's electoral victory, marking a pivotal moment leading away from authoritarianism.

Conclusion

  • The document provides insights into understanding democratic transitions through different theoretical frameworks, including collective action and tipping models, alongside historical examples.