Human Nature and Political Theory

The Problem of Human Nature: Hobbes and Locke

I. Introduction to Human Nature Debates

  • This topic explores fundamental questions about human beings and how our nature influences political and social structures.

  • Key areas of debate include:

    • Nature vs. Nurture

    • Intellect vs. Instinct

    • Competition vs. Cooperation

    • Individualism vs. Collectivism

    • Society, Consent, Conflict, & Social Divisions

II. Nature vs. Nurture

  • Core Question: Is the essence of human nature fixed or flexible?

Nature: Survival of the Fittest
  • Core Idea: Human nature is determined by biological factors and is fundamentally unchangeable.

  • Theoretical Roots: Theories of humanity rooted in the natural sciences, such as Social Darwinism and the principle of 'Survival of the Fittest'.

  • Implications for Traits: Over time, individuals develop traits (desirable or undesirable) that dictate their ability to thrive.

  • Pursuit of Goals: We use our inherent natural skills, talents, and traits to pursue life, liberty, property, and happiness.

  • Differential Success: Success in these pursuits varies based on individuals' differing traits.

  • Extreme Forms: In its most extreme interpretations, this perspective can lead to the justification of social, political, and economic hierarchies, including perceived differences between races/ethnicities or genders/sexes.

  • Associated Thinkers: Hobbes, Locke.

Nurture: Plasticity of Human Nature
  • Core Idea: Humanity is not fixed; humans are social creatures who learn and adapt based on interactions with others.

  • Theoretical Roots: A sociological approach to human nature.

  • Flexibility: Human nature is considered flexible and capable of change.

  • Environmental Influence: Social environments significantly condition human behavior.

  • Policy Implications: Political institutions are seen as crucial for leveling the playing field, ensuring that success is not solely determined by 'the strongest'. This advocates for more government intervention, regulation, and social welfare programs.

  • Associated Thinkers: Rousseau, Marx.

III. Intellect vs. Instinct

  • Core Question: To what extent does reason, as opposed to emotion or impulse, influence human conduct?

Rationalism
  • Emergence: Belief in humanity's ability to reason emerged prominently during the Enlightenment.

  • Shift in Values: Emphasizes less on religion, tradition, and unquestioning trust in hierarchy.

  • Human Agency: Humans possess free will and self-determination; they do not need to follow others.

  • Individual Control: Individuals are seen as having control over their own future.

  • Value of Freedom: Places a high value on individual freedom, including the right to pursue one's own self-interest.

  • Connections: Can be connected to theories of Locke (classical liberalism) and Marx (socialism).

Anti-Rationalism & Instinct
  • Limits of Reason: Proposes that not everything can be fully understood or rationalized by intellect.

  • Primacy of Emotion: Humans primarily navigate the world based on instinct, impulse, and emotion, rather than pure reason.

  • **