How to Determine Extrema using Candidates Test
What You Need to Know
Why this matters
The Candidates Test is your go-to, reliable method for finding absolute (global) maxima/minima of a function on a closed interval. On AP Calc, it shows up constantly in FRQs and MC because it’s systematic and hard to mess up if you follow the checklist.
Core idea (the theorem-level statement)
If is **continuous** on a closed interval , then by the **Extreme Value Theorem (EVT)**, attains an **absolute maximum** and **absolute minimum** somewhere in .
The Candidates Test tells you where to look:
- Endpoints: and
- Critical numbers in : where or **does not exist** (but does)
Then you evaluate at all candidates; the largest value is the absolute max and the smallest value is the absolute min.
Key definitions (you need these precise)
- Absolute maximum on : a point in such that for all .
- Absolute minimum on : a point in such that for all .
- Critical number: a value in the **domain** of where or is undefined.
Big warning: EVT (and thus the guarantee that absolute extrema exist) requires continuity on a closed interval. If the interval is open or the function is discontinuous, absolute extrema may not exist.
When you use the Candidates Test
Use it when the problem asks for:
- Absolute max/min on a closed interval
- “Find the maximum/minimum value of on ”
- Optimization restricted to a domain like
It’s also a great fallback when you’re unsure whether a “peak” is local or absolute.
Step-by-Step Breakdown
The Candidates Test algorithm (absolute extrema on )
Check the setup
- Make sure you’re working on a closed interval .
- Ensure is **continuous** on (common in AP problems; still check for piecewise, radicals, denominators).
Compute the derivative
- Find (or use a given derivative/graph/table).
Find interior critical numbers
- Solve for .
- Find where **does not exist** (corners, cusps, vertical tangents, discontinuities in ) and keep those values if is defined there and they lie in .
List all candidates
- Include endpoints: and .
- Include all critical numbers in .
Evaluate at each candidate
- Compute values .
Compare values
- Biggest function value absolute maximum value.
- Smallest function value absolute minimum value.
State your answer clearly
- Give both the x-location(s) and the value(s).
- If multiple points tie, say so.
Decision point: If the question is about absolute extrema, you must compare function values (not just derivative signs).
Mini worked walkthrough (annotated)
Find absolute extrema of on .
- Closed interval and polynomial continuous.
- .
- Critical numbers: (both in ).
- Candidates: .
- Evaluate:
- Compare: max value at ; min value at .
Key Formulas, Rules & Facts
Candidates Test essentials
| Item | What to do | Notes / AP-style wording |
|---|---|---|
| Extreme Value Theorem (EVT) | If is continuous on , then absolute max/min exist on | Guarantees existence, not location |
| Candidates Test (absolute extrema) | Check , , and critical numbers in | Then compare -values |
| Critical number definition | is critical if or DNE, with in the domain of | You must confirm exists |
| Fermat’s Theorem (interior local extrema) | If has a local max/min at interior and exists at , then | Explains why you solve |
What counts as “ does not exist” (common sources)
- Corner in piecewise/absolute value: left and right derivatives differ.
- Cusp: slopes blow up with opposite signs.
- Vertical tangent: derivative infinite/undefined but function may be continuous.
- Derivative discontinuity: often piecewise-defined derivatives.
Reminder: A point where is not defined is not a critical number (because critical numbers must be in the domain).
Local vs absolute (don’t mix them)
- Local extrema: compare nearby values; can happen at critical numbers.
- Absolute extrema on : compare against every point in interval.
- A local max might not be the absolute max if an endpoint is higher.
Graph/table version of Candidates Test
If you’re given a graph of or a table:
- Candidates still come from:
- endpoints
- where (x-intercepts of )
- where is undefined
- To compare absolute extrema you still need function values:
- from a table of
- by integrating: if is given and an initial value is provided
Examples & Applications
Example 1: Absolute extrema on a closed interval (classic)
Find absolute extrema of on .
- Critical number: (in interval)
- Candidates:
- Evaluate:
- Absolute min value at ; absolute max value at .
Exam angle: Quadratic has a vertex, but the endpoint can still win for max.
Example 2: Derivative undefined at a corner (must include!)
Find absolute extrema of on .
- is continuous on .
- is undefined at (corner), so is a critical number.
- Candidates:
- Evaluate:
- Absolute min value at ; absolute max value at .
Exam angle: If you only solve you miss the corner completely.
Example 3: Restricted domain + interior critical point
Find absolute extrema of on .
- Endpoints matter because of the closed interval and because radicals often peak inside.
- Differentiate (product rule + power rule):
- Solve for :
- Multiply by :
- Candidates:
- Evaluate:
- Absolute max is at ; absolute min is at and .
Exam angle: Don’t ignore endpoints just because they “look boring.”
Example 4: Given and an initial value (BC-flavored)
Suppose and . Find where has absolute extrema on .
- Critical numbers from : , plus endpoints .
- Candidates: .
- Need function values. Use accumulation:
- Integrand:
- Antiderivative:
- Evaluate:
- Absolute min value at ; absolute max value at and .
Exam angle: When is given, you often must integrate to compare candidate values.
Common Mistakes & Traps
Forgetting endpoints
- Wrong: Only checking where .
- Why wrong: Absolute extrema on can occur at or .
- Fix: Always write “Candidates: endpoints + critical numbers.”
Using points where is not defined
- Wrong: Treating a discontinuity (like a vertical asymptote) as a candidate.
- Why wrong: Critical numbers must be in the domain of .
- Fix: Check domain first; if doesn’t exist, cannot be an extremum.
Not checking where does not exist
- Wrong: Solving and stopping.
- Why wrong: Corners/cusps/vertical tangents can produce extrema with undefined derivative.
- Fix: After differentiating, ask: “Where is undefined inside ?”
Finding critical numbers outside the interval and still using them
- Wrong: Solving and evaluating all solutions.
- Why wrong: The test is for extrema on ; only candidates in matter.
- Fix: Filter critical numbers to (and include endpoints separately).
Mixing up x-values and y-values in the final answer
- Wrong: Saying “absolute max is ” when they asked for the maximum value.
- Why wrong: Problems sometimes ask for the value , sometimes the point, sometimes both.
- Fix: State both: “Absolute max value is at .”
Assuming a critical point guarantees an absolute extremum
- Wrong: Seeing and declaring max/min.
- Why wrong: is only a candidate; it could be a local min/max or neither.
- Fix: Compare at all candidates (or use first/second derivative tests for local behavior, then still compare values for absolute).
Using derivative sign (increasing/decreasing) but never computing values
- Wrong: Concluding absolute max where changes from to .
- Why wrong: That gives a local max; an endpoint might be larger.
- Fix: For absolute extrema on , you must compare actual -values.
Applying EVT when continuity fails
- Wrong: Assuming absolute max/min exist on without checking continuity.
- Why wrong: Discontinuities can prevent extrema from existing (even on a closed interval).
- Fix: Quick continuity scan: holes, jumps, asymptotes, piecewise mismatches.
Memory Aids & Quick Tricks
| Trick / mnemonic | What it helps you remember | When to use it |
|---|---|---|
| “E.C.C.” = Endpoints, Critical, Compare | The whole Candidates Test workflow | Any absolute-extrema-on- problem |
| “Critical = Zero or DNE (but defined!)” | Critical numbers are or DNE, with existing | Rational functions, absolute value, piecewise, radicals |
| “Closed + Continuous ⇒ extrema exist” | EVT conditions | Before you promise a max/min exists |
| “Local from signs, absolute from values” | First derivative sign tells local behavior; absolute needs comparisons | When tempted to stop after a sign chart |
Quick Review Checklist
- [ ] Are you on a closed interval ?
- [ ] Is **continuous** on (EVT applicable)?
- [ ] Did you compute or use correctly?
- [ ] Did you find all critical numbers in where ?
- [ ] Did you include points in where **does not exist** (but does)?
- [ ] Did you include both endpoints and ?
- [ ] Did you evaluate at every candidate?
- [ ] Did you choose the largest value for absolute max and smallest for absolute min?
- [ ] Did you report answers with clear x-location(s) and function value(s)?
You’ve got this—run E.C.C. carefully and the problem basically grades itself.