7.4 Two-Tail Test
Key concepts and facts from section 7.4 of the Pearson A Level Maths Applied Master One textbook, focusing on two-tail tests.
Key Facts
Two-Tail Test Form:
- Null Hypothesis: H_0: P =
- Alternative Hypothesis: H_1: P \neq
- Used to check for a change in the proportion P.
Keywords:
Binomial Distribution:
- If X ~ Bin(n, p), where n is the fixed number of trials and p is the fixed probability, and x is the observed value:
- If x < E(X) = n \times p, find P(X \leq x).
- If x > E(X) = n \times p, find P(X \geq x).
Significance Level:
- Divide the significance level by 2 for a two-tail test.
- If P > (significance level / 2), accept H0 and reject H1.
- If P < (significance level / 2), reject H0 and accept H1.
Critical Region:
- If the observed value x falls inside the critical region, reject H0 and accept H1.
- If the observed value x does not fall inside the critical region, accept H0 and reject H1.
- Actual Significance Level = Probability of the critical region.
Exam-Style Question 1
Scenario: AGA's carrots have a 25% chance of being longer than 7 cm. A new fertilizer is tested on 30 carrots, and 13 are longer than 7 cm. Test at a 5% significance level whether the fertilizer has changed the proportion.
Solution:
- Define the test statistic:
- Let X be the number of carrots with a length more than 7 cm.
- Distribution:
- Hypotheses:
- H_0: p = 0.25
- H_1: p \neq 0.25
- Observed value vs. Expected value:
- Observed value: x = 13
- Expected value: E(X) = 30 \times 0.25 = 7.5
- Since 13 > 7.5, calculate P(X \geq 13).
- Calculate Probability:
- P(X \geq 13) = 1 - P(X < 13) = 1 - P(X \leq 12)
- Using binomial CDF: 1 - 0.9784 = 0.0216
- Compare with Significance Level:
- Significance level / 2 = 0.05 / 2 = 0.025
- Since 0.0216 < 0.025, reject H0 and accept H1.
- Conclusion:
- There is sufficient evidence at the 5% significance level that the new fertilizer has changed the probability of a carrot being longer than 7 cm.
Variation: If the observed value was less than the expected value, use P(X \leq x) instead of P(X \geq x).
Exam-Style Question 2
Scenario: 10% of customers arrive late. A new manager believes the proportion has changed. A random sample of 50 customers is taken.
Part A: Write down the suitable null and alternative hypotheses.
- Solution:
- Let X be the number of patients who arrive late for their appointment.
- X ~ Bin(50, 0.1)
- H_0: p = 0.1
- H_1: p \neq 0.1
Part B: Using a 5% level of significance, find the critical region.
- Solution:
- Lower Critical Region (LCR): (p < 0.1)
- Let C_1 be the lower critical value.
- Find the largest value of C such that P(X \leq C_1) < 0.025
- Using binomial CDF, x = 0, so C_1 = 0
- LCR: X = 0
- Upper Critical Region (UCR): (p > 0.1)
- Let C_2 be the upper critical value.
- Find the smallest value C2 such that P(X \geq C2) < 0.025
- Rewrite: P(X \leq C_2 - 1) > 0.975
- Using the binomial CDF table, x = 9, so C2 - 1 = 9, thus C2 = 10
- UCR: X \geq 10
- Critical Region: X = 0 or X \geq 10
Part C: Find the actual significance level of the test.
- Solution:
- Actual Significance Level (ASL) = P(X = 0) + P(X \geq 10)
- P(X \geq 10) = 1 - P(X < 10) = 1 - P(X \leq 9)
- Using binomial CDF, P(X \leq 9) = 0.9755
- Using binomial PD with N = 50, p = 0.1, x = 0, P(X = 0) = 0.0052
- ASL = 0.0052 + (1 - 0.9755) = 0.0297 = 2.97\%
Part D: The manager observes that 15 of the 50 customers arrive late. Comment on the manager's belief with reference to your answer in Part B.
- Solution:
- Observed value: 15
- Since 15 > 10, the observed value falls inside the upper critical region.
- Reject H0 and accept H1.
- Conclusion: There is sufficient evidence at the 5% significance level that the proportion of patients that arrive late has indeed changed.