Principles of Macroeconomics - Interdependence and the Gains from Trade
Chapter 3: Interdependence and the Gains from Trade
Chapter Objectives
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to answer:
Why do people – and nations – choose to be economically interdependent?
How can trade make everyone better off?
What is absolute advantage?
What is comparative advantage?
How are these concepts similar?
How are they different?
3-1 A Parable for the Modern Economy
Interdependence
Economic interdependence is critical in modern trade.
People rely on goods and services from regions they may never visit, illustrated by examples:
Coffee from Kenya
Dress shirts from China
Cell phones from Taiwan
Hair gel from Cleveland, OH
Economic Interdependence
Key Principle: "Trade can make everyone better off."
This principle draws close examination regarding:
The individual gains from trade.
Reasons for economic interdependence.
Ask the Experts: Trade between China and the United States
A perspective from IGM Economic Experts Panel, June 19, 2012:
"Trade with China makes most Americans better off because, among other advantages, they can buy goods that are made or assembled more cheaply in China."
Example: The U.S. and Japan
Scenario Setup
Countries: The U.S. and Japan
Goods: Computers and wheat
Resource: Labor (measured in hours)
Examination of production and consumption:
If countries are self-sufficient vs. if they engage in trade.
Production Possibilities in the U.S.
Labor availability: 50,000 hours/month
Production time required:
1 computer: requires 100 hours
1 ton of wheat: requires 10 hours
Maximum outputs based on labor:
500 computers (using all labor)
5,000 tons of wheat (using all labor)
The U.S. Production Possibilities Frontier (PPF)
Production capabilities plotted on the PPF, with combinations possible:
Producing 250 computers and 2,500 tons of wheat with half labor used for each good.
Active Learning 1: Japan’s PPF
Information for Graphing Japan’s PPF
Labor availability: 30,000 hours/month
Production time required:
1 computer: requires 125 hours
1 ton of wheat: requires 25 hours
Maximum outputs:
240 computers
1,200 tons of wheat
Japan Without Trade
Domestic consumption levels if Japan uses half its labor:
Produces 120 computers and 600 tons of wheat.
Consumption With and Without Trade
U.S. consumption without trade: 250 computers, 2,500 tons of wheat.
Japanese consumption without trade: 120 computers, 600 tons of wheat.
Analysis of consumption without trade vs. consumption with trade focuses on production and trade dynamics.
Active Learning 2: Production Under Trade
If U.S. produces 3,400 tons of wheat:
Remaining labor dedicated to producing 160 computers.
If Japan produces 240 computers:
Labor constraints imply 0 tons of wheat produced.
Exports and Imports
Imports: Goods produced abroad and sold domestically.
Exports: Goods produced domestically and sold abroad.
Active Learning 3: Consumption Under Trade
Scenario: U.S. exports 700 tons of wheat and imports 110 computers from Japan.
Determine consumption in both countries post-trade and plot data on respective PPFs.
3-2 Comparative Advantage: The Driving Force of Specialization
Absolute Advantage
Definition: The ability to produce a good using fewer inputs than another producer.
The U.S. absolute advantage in wheat:
10 labor hours vs. 25 hours (Japan).
The U.S. absolute advantage in computers:
100 labor hours (U.S.) vs. 125 hours (Japan).
Understanding Gains from Trade
Although the U.S. has absolute advantages in both goods, Japan specializes in computers due to different opportunity costs.
Trade gains arise when countries specialize in goods produced with lower production costs.
Opportunity Cost and Comparative Advantage
Opportunity Cost: The loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen.
For goods:
Computers:
U.S. opportunity cost: 10 tons of wheat per computer (100 labor hours).
Japan opportunity cost: 5 tons of wheat per computer (125 labor hours).
Comparative Advantage
Definition: The ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer.
Principle of Comparative Advantage: Each good should be produced by the individual with the lower opportunity cost.
3-3 Applications of Comparative Advantage
Example Scenario: Argentina vs. Brazil
Argentina (Labor) Consumption:
1 lb. coffee: 2 hours
1 bottle wine: 4 hours
Brazil (Labor) Consumption:
1 lb. coffee: 1 hour
1 bottle wine: 5 hours
Result: Brazil has an absolute advantage in coffee; Argentina has a comparative advantage in wine.
Gains from Trade - Naomi Osaka Scenario
Osaka’s potential earnings from commercial work compared to mowing her lawn demonstrate comparative advantage in action.
The conditions for mutually beneficial trade between Osaka and Hari.
Should the United States Trade with Other Countries?
Comparative advantage applied to U.S.-Japan trade:
U.S. workers can produce:
1 car or 2 tons of food (1 month)
Japanese workers can produce:
1 car or 1 ton of food (1 month)
Findings: Japan has a comparative advantage in cars, while the U.S. in food.
3-4 Conclusion
The principle of comparative advantage asserts that trade can make everyone better off:
Addresses fundamental questions about resource allocation and market forces of supply and demand.
Conditions of trade must be such that both parties see gains, emphasizing the importance of economic interdependence.
Ethical and Practical Implications
Trade Impact: Different stakeholders may experience varying impacts from trade agreements, as highlighted by expert opinions on U.S.-China relations, showing complex interaction between advantages and disadvantage.