AH

Principles of Macroeconomics - Interdependence and the Gains from Trade

Chapter 3: Interdependence and the Gains from Trade

Chapter Objectives

  • By the end of this chapter, you should be able to answer:

    • Why do people – and nations – choose to be economically interdependent?

    • How can trade make everyone better off?

    • What is absolute advantage?

    • What is comparative advantage?

    • How are these concepts similar?

    • How are they different?

3-1 A Parable for the Modern Economy

Interdependence

  • Economic interdependence is critical in modern trade.

  • People rely on goods and services from regions they may never visit, illustrated by examples:

    • Coffee from Kenya

    • Dress shirts from China

    • Cell phones from Taiwan

    • Hair gel from Cleveland, OH

Economic Interdependence

  • Key Principle: "Trade can make everyone better off."

  • This principle draws close examination regarding:

    • The individual gains from trade.

    • Reasons for economic interdependence.

Ask the Experts: Trade between China and the United States

  • A perspective from IGM Economic Experts Panel, June 19, 2012:

    • "Trade with China makes most Americans better off because, among other advantages, they can buy goods that are made or assembled more cheaply in China."

Example: The U.S. and Japan

Scenario Setup
  • Countries: The U.S. and Japan

  • Goods: Computers and wheat

  • Resource: Labor (measured in hours)

  • Examination of production and consumption:

    • If countries are self-sufficient vs. if they engage in trade.

Production Possibilities in the U.S.
  • Labor availability: 50,000 hours/month

  1. Production time required:

    • 1 computer: requires 100 hours

    • 1 ton of wheat: requires 10 hours

  • Maximum outputs based on labor:

    • 500 computers (using all labor)

    • 5,000 tons of wheat (using all labor)

The U.S. Production Possibilities Frontier (PPF)
  • Production capabilities plotted on the PPF, with combinations possible:

    • Producing 250 computers and 2,500 tons of wheat with half labor used for each good.

Active Learning 1: Japan’s PPF
Information for Graphing Japan’s PPF
  • Labor availability: 30,000 hours/month

  1. Production time required:

    • 1 computer: requires 125 hours

    • 1 ton of wheat: requires 25 hours

  • Maximum outputs:

    • 240 computers

    • 1,200 tons of wheat

Japan Without Trade
  • Domestic consumption levels if Japan uses half its labor:

    • Produces 120 computers and 600 tons of wheat.

Consumption With and Without Trade
  • U.S. consumption without trade: 250 computers, 2,500 tons of wheat.

  • Japanese consumption without trade: 120 computers, 600 tons of wheat.

  • Analysis of consumption without trade vs. consumption with trade focuses on production and trade dynamics.

Active Learning 2: Production Under Trade
  1. If U.S. produces 3,400 tons of wheat:

    • Remaining labor dedicated to producing 160 computers.

  2. If Japan produces 240 computers:

    • Labor constraints imply 0 tons of wheat produced.

Exports and Imports
  • Imports: Goods produced abroad and sold domestically.

  • Exports: Goods produced domestically and sold abroad.

Active Learning 3: Consumption Under Trade
  • Scenario: U.S. exports 700 tons of wheat and imports 110 computers from Japan.

    • Determine consumption in both countries post-trade and plot data on respective PPFs.

3-2 Comparative Advantage: The Driving Force of Specialization

Absolute Advantage
  • Definition: The ability to produce a good using fewer inputs than another producer.

  1. The U.S. absolute advantage in wheat:

    • 10 labor hours vs. 25 hours (Japan).

  2. The U.S. absolute advantage in computers:

    • 100 labor hours (U.S.) vs. 125 hours (Japan).

Understanding Gains from Trade
  • Although the U.S. has absolute advantages in both goods, Japan specializes in computers due to different opportunity costs.

  • Trade gains arise when countries specialize in goods produced with lower production costs.

Opportunity Cost and Comparative Advantage
  • Opportunity Cost: The loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen.

  • For goods:

    • Computers:

    • U.S. opportunity cost: 10 tons of wheat per computer (100 labor hours).

    • Japan opportunity cost: 5 tons of wheat per computer (125 labor hours).

Comparative Advantage
  • Definition: The ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer.

  • Principle of Comparative Advantage: Each good should be produced by the individual with the lower opportunity cost.

3-3 Applications of Comparative Advantage

Example Scenario: Argentina vs. Brazil
  • Argentina (Labor) Consumption:

    • 1 lb. coffee: 2 hours

    • 1 bottle wine: 4 hours

  • Brazil (Labor) Consumption:

    • 1 lb. coffee: 1 hour

    • 1 bottle wine: 5 hours

    • Result: Brazil has an absolute advantage in coffee; Argentina has a comparative advantage in wine.

Gains from Trade - Naomi Osaka Scenario
  • Osaka’s potential earnings from commercial work compared to mowing her lawn demonstrate comparative advantage in action.

  • The conditions for mutually beneficial trade between Osaka and Hari.

Should the United States Trade with Other Countries?

  • Comparative advantage applied to U.S.-Japan trade:

    • U.S. workers can produce:

      • 1 car or 2 tons of food (1 month)

    • Japanese workers can produce:

      • 1 car or 1 ton of food (1 month)

  • Findings: Japan has a comparative advantage in cars, while the U.S. in food.

3-4 Conclusion

  • The principle of comparative advantage asserts that trade can make everyone better off:

    • Addresses fundamental questions about resource allocation and market forces of supply and demand.

  • Conditions of trade must be such that both parties see gains, emphasizing the importance of economic interdependence.

Ethical and Practical Implications
  • Trade Impact: Different stakeholders may experience varying impacts from trade agreements, as highlighted by expert opinions on U.S.-China relations, showing complex interaction between advantages and disadvantage.