SC

Study Notes on Attachment Classifications

Associations Between Attachment Classifications of Mothers, Fathers, and Infants

Overview

  • Authors: Howard Steele, Miriam Steele, Peter Fonagy

  • Source: Child Development, Apr. 1996, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 541-555

  • Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Society for Research in Child Development

  • Context: Examines how attachment classifications of parents affect their infants in attachment patterns.

Key Findings

  • Predictive values of Adult Attachment Interviews (AAIs):

    • Mothers' AAIs significantly predict infant-mother attachment as measured by the Strange Situation Procedure (SSP):

    • Chi-square (X^2 = 41.87), N = 96, df = 9, p < .0001

    • Fathers' AAIs predict infant-father attachment similarly:

    • Chi-square (X^2 = 18.94), N = 90, df = 6, p < .005

  • Predictive power is dampened by not being able to predict insecure-resistant attachment in mothers and absence with fathers.

  • Notably, infant-father attachment classifications showed association with infant-mother classifications:

    • Chi-square (X^2 = 3.78), N = 90, df = 1, p < .05.

Background

  • The Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) developed by George, Kaplan, and Main in 1985 assesses adult attachments based on narratives concerning childhood.

  • Citations for prior longitudinal studies:

    • MAin et al. (1985), Grossmann et al. (1988), Ainsworth & Eichberg (1991) - significant connections between adult attachment styles and infant-mother attachment.

Previous Research Insights

  • Initial studies revealed strong correlations between mothers' AAI classifications and infant-mother attachment assessments.

  • Weak correlations observed for fathers, with a call for more rigorous cross-generational examinations.

  • Previous studies underscore that infant attachment patterns may be influenced by a spectrum of factors, including infant temperament.

Study Dynamics

  • Method:

    • Included 90 infants assessed in the SSP with both their mother and father, linking AAI classifiers with observed behaviors.

  • Analysis of Associations:

    • Addressed the interactive dependencies between maternal/father classifications and infant attachment outcomes with log-linear modeling.

Methodology
  • Sample Characteristics:

    • Expectant Mothers: N = 100, Median age 31 years (ages 22-42), predominantly married, educated middle-class.

    • Expectant Fathers: N = 100, Median age 33 years, highly homogeneous backgrounds.

Data Collection Procedures
  • Adult Attachment Interview conducted in private settings, ensuring response independence between parents.

  • Strange Situation Procedure (SSP):

    • A 20-minute assessment that identifies secure and insecure attachment via reunion behavior post-separation.

Key Data Presentations

  • Table 1 - Correlations between infant attachment to mother at 12 months and to father at 18 months reflective of insecure (A), secure (B), disorganized (C).

  • Table 2 - Highlights AAI classifications (D, E, F, U) qualitative interplay with infant attachment at 1 year.

Statistical Results

  • Statistical analysis demonstrated significant predictive associations (p-values detailed) between parental attachment interviews and infant attachment classifications.

  • Observed matches of classifications indicated critical intergenerational influence on child-parent attachment behaviors.

Discussion and Implications

  • Intergenerational Transmission of Attachment:

    • Data suggest maternal attachment influences child-father attachment, reinforcing the idea of a primary maternal influence during early development.

  • Cultural Factors:

    • Noted that the current sample is skewed towards middle-class British populations, necessitating caution in generalization of results.

  • Acknowledgment of possible influences of infant temperament and parenting methodologies on attachment patterns.

Future Research Directions

  • Emphasis on diversifying study samples to include varied socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds.

  • Establishing clearer connections between infant temperament and attachment classifications.

  • Potential for therapeutic interventions to enhance attachment security for future generations.