Social Influences on Behavior
Psychological forces exerted on us by others:
Judgments
Expectations
Demands
These can be real or imagined
The strongest influence comes from those who are physically or psychologically closest to us.
When positive, it promotes acceptance by others and predictability in our interactions.
When negative, it promotes foolish or immoral action.
Social Facilitation: a social expectation to perform leads to additional arousal and, in comfortable situations, leads to an increase in performance.
Easy Tasks: so simple, instinctive, or well-learned that they become automatic with little conscious thought.
Social interference: part of a broader phenomenon of choking under pressure.
Choking: a highly aroused mental state produced by increased pressure that can cause performance to worsen
Stereotype Threat: potent cause of choking on academic tests due to stereotypes.
Impression Management: the entire set of ways by which people consciously and unconsciously modify their behavior to influence others’ impressions of them
Two general reasons we conform to others:
Informative Influence: based on the objective nature of an event or situation
Normative Influence: based on a desire to be part of a group
Experiment 1: Everyone answers and most participants conformed
The participants gave informational reasons why they conformed
Experiment 2: Participants wrote answers privately and conformity dropped
When fear of evaluation by others was removed, conformity dropped, indicating that normative influences were mostly involved
Public Service Message: implicit norms
Cialdini suggests that pubic service messages would be more effective if they emphasized that the majority of people behave in the desired way and implicitly portrayed the undesired behavior as abnormal.
Diffusion of Responsibility: a witness is more likely to aid a victim when alone than when in a group
In a group, each bystander’s level of responsibility “diffuses” across the group
Conformity influence may be either:
Informational: group inaction may be a source of info leading you to conclude that this isn’t an emergency
Normative: group inaction can establish an implicit social norm
Groupthink: mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive group, and their strive for unanimity overrides motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action
Group Polarization: the tendency for a group to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclination of members
Cognitive Dissonance: the feeling of discomfort resulting from holding two conflicting beliefs. With the discrepancy between beliefs and behaviors, something must change to eliminate/reduce the dissonance
Low ball Technique: Increasing the price after a commitment to buy
Foot-in-the-door technique: making a small request to prepare for a larger one
Reciprocity Norm: people feel obliged to return favors
Pre-giving: a salesman gives you a gift before asking for a donation or giving a sales-pitch
Shared Identity: good salespeople find commonalities with the customer. Creates a sense of friendship.
Obedience: cases of compliance in which the requester is perceived as an authority figure as an order.
Milgrams Experiment:
“Teacher” -the actual participant
“Learner =“ -confederate in another room
The researcher repeatedly said “the experiment must continue” etc.
Results-most went to 450 volts (lethal dose)
Factors responsible for Milgram’s findings:
Norm of obedience to legitimate authorities
Experimenters’ self-assurance and acceptance of responsibility
The immediacy of the experimenter and the distance of the learner
The sequential nature of the task
Social Dilemma: a tension between acting for the good of a group and one’s selfish good at the expense of others
Tragedy of the Commons: compared Earth with the common grazing land in towns
Adding another cow increases profits and hardly depletes, but if everyone does that, the land will deteriorate for everyone
Group Projects: the results depend on group effort or voluntary contribution
Possible situations
Social working or contributing: cooperating or taking charge in the group
Social loafing: not cooperating or slacking off in the group; while retaining the benefits of the group’s actions
Divided boys’ camp into two cabins with separate tasks
In a few days, each group developed its leaders, norms, and names.
Researchers proposed a series of competitions, that was eagerly accepted
Three changes occurred rapidly:
Within group solidarity
Negative stereotyping of the other group
Between-group hostility
The only way to reverse the effects was their create a superordinate goal that forced everyone to come together to solve the problem.
Psychological forces exerted on us by others:
Judgments
Expectations
Demands
These can be real or imagined
The strongest influence comes from those who are physically or psychologically closest to us.
When positive, it promotes acceptance by others and predictability in our interactions.
When negative, it promotes foolish or immoral action.
Social Facilitation: a social expectation to perform leads to additional arousal and, in comfortable situations, leads to an increase in performance.
Easy Tasks: so simple, instinctive, or well-learned that they become automatic with little conscious thought.
Social interference: part of a broader phenomenon of choking under pressure.
Choking: a highly aroused mental state produced by increased pressure that can cause performance to worsen
Stereotype Threat: potent cause of choking on academic tests due to stereotypes.
Impression Management: the entire set of ways by which people consciously and unconsciously modify their behavior to influence others’ impressions of them
Two general reasons we conform to others:
Informative Influence: based on the objective nature of an event or situation
Normative Influence: based on a desire to be part of a group
Experiment 1: Everyone answers and most participants conformed
The participants gave informational reasons why they conformed
Experiment 2: Participants wrote answers privately and conformity dropped
When fear of evaluation by others was removed, conformity dropped, indicating that normative influences were mostly involved
Public Service Message: implicit norms
Cialdini suggests that pubic service messages would be more effective if they emphasized that the majority of people behave in the desired way and implicitly portrayed the undesired behavior as abnormal.
Diffusion of Responsibility: a witness is more likely to aid a victim when alone than when in a group
In a group, each bystander’s level of responsibility “diffuses” across the group
Conformity influence may be either:
Informational: group inaction may be a source of info leading you to conclude that this isn’t an emergency
Normative: group inaction can establish an implicit social norm
Groupthink: mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive group, and their strive for unanimity overrides motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action
Group Polarization: the tendency for a group to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclination of members
Cognitive Dissonance: the feeling of discomfort resulting from holding two conflicting beliefs. With the discrepancy between beliefs and behaviors, something must change to eliminate/reduce the dissonance
Low ball Technique: Increasing the price after a commitment to buy
Foot-in-the-door technique: making a small request to prepare for a larger one
Reciprocity Norm: people feel obliged to return favors
Pre-giving: a salesman gives you a gift before asking for a donation or giving a sales-pitch
Shared Identity: good salespeople find commonalities with the customer. Creates a sense of friendship.
Obedience: cases of compliance in which the requester is perceived as an authority figure as an order.
Milgrams Experiment:
“Teacher” -the actual participant
“Learner =“ -confederate in another room
The researcher repeatedly said “the experiment must continue” etc.
Results-most went to 450 volts (lethal dose)
Factors responsible for Milgram’s findings:
Norm of obedience to legitimate authorities
Experimenters’ self-assurance and acceptance of responsibility
The immediacy of the experimenter and the distance of the learner
The sequential nature of the task
Social Dilemma: a tension between acting for the good of a group and one’s selfish good at the expense of others
Tragedy of the Commons: compared Earth with the common grazing land in towns
Adding another cow increases profits and hardly depletes, but if everyone does that, the land will deteriorate for everyone
Group Projects: the results depend on group effort or voluntary contribution
Possible situations
Social working or contributing: cooperating or taking charge in the group
Social loafing: not cooperating or slacking off in the group; while retaining the benefits of the group’s actions
Divided boys’ camp into two cabins with separate tasks
In a few days, each group developed its leaders, norms, and names.
Researchers proposed a series of competitions, that was eagerly accepted
Three changes occurred rapidly:
Within group solidarity
Negative stereotyping of the other group
Between-group hostility
The only way to reverse the effects was their create a superordinate goal that forced everyone to come together to solve the problem.