what is organizational structure?
how jobs tasks are formally divided, grouped, and coordinated
key elements:
work specialization
departmentalization
chain of command
span of control
centralization and decentralization
formalization
boundry spanning
key design questions and answers for designing the proper organization structure
to what degree are activities subdivided into seperate jobs?
work specialization
on what basis will jobs be grouped together?
departmentalization
to whom do inviduals and groups report?
chain of command
how many individuals can a manager efficiently and effectively direct?
span of control
where does decision-making authority lie?
centralization and decentralization
to what degree will there be rules and regulations to direct emplopees and managers?
formalization
do individuals from different areas need to regularly interact?
boundry spanning
1. work specialization
the degree to which tasks in the organization are subdivided into seperate jobs
division of labor
makes efficient use of employee skills
increases employee skills through repetition
specialized training is more efficient
allows use of specialized equipment
2. departmentalization
the basis by whch jobs are grouped together
grouping activities by:
function
product
geography
process
customer
3. chain of command
authority
the rights inherent in a managerial position to give orders and to expect the orders to be obeyed
chain of command
the unbroken line of authority that extends from the top of the organization to the lowest echelon and clarifies who reports to whom
unity of command
a subrdinate should have only one superior to whom he or she is directly responsible
4. span of control
the number of subordinates a manager can efficiently and effectively direct
wider spans of management increase organizational efficiency
narrow span drawbacks:
expense of additional layers of management
increased complexity of vertical communication
encouragement of overly tight supervision and discouragement of employee autonomy
5. centralization and decentralization
centralization
the degree to which decision making is concentrated at a single point in the organization
decentralization
the degree to which decision making is spread throughout the organization
advantages of a decentralized organization:
can act more quickly to solve problems
more people provide input into decsions
employees are less likely to feel alienated from those who make decisions that affect their work lives
6. formalization
the degree to which jobs within the organization are standarized
high fromulation
minimum worker discretion in how to get the job done
may rules and procedures to follow
low formulation
job behaviors are nonprogrammed
employees have maximum discretion
7. boundry spanning
occurs when individuals form relationships with peope outside their formally assigned groups
positive results are especially strong in organizations that encourage extensive internal communication; in other words, external boundry spanning is most effective when it is followed up with internal boundry spanning
common organization designs: simple structure
simple structure
a structure characterized by a low degree of departmentalization, wide spans of control, authroity centralizaed in a single person, and litle formalization
simple structure: the manager and the owner are one and the same
strengths:
simple, fast, and flexible
inexpensive to maintain
accountability is clear
weaknesses:
difficult to maintain in anything other than small organizations
risky— everything depends on one person
common organization designs
a bureaucracy is characterized by standardization
highly rountine operating tasks
very formulized rules and regulations
tasks grouped into functional departments
centralized authority
narrow spans of control
decision making that follows the chain of command
the bureaucracy:
the strengths of bureaucracy:
ability to perform standarized activites in a high efficient manner
weaknesses of bureaucracy:
subunit conflicts
matrix structure
a structure that creates dual line of authority and combines functional and product departmentalization
key elements:
gains the advantages of functional and product departmentalization while avoiding their weakness
facilitates coordination of complex and interdependent activites
breaks down unity-of-command concept
alternate design options: virtual organization
a small, core organization that outsources its major business functions
highly centralized with little or no departmentalization
provides maximum flexibility while concentrating on what the organization does best
reduced control over key parts of the business
alternate design options: team structure
the team structure: elminates the chain of command and replaces departments with empowered teams
removes vertical and horizontal boundries
breaks down external bnoundries
flattens the hierarchy and minmizes status and rank
when fully operational, the team structure may break down geographic barriers
alternate design options: circular structure
in the circular structure: in the center are the executives, and radiating outward in rings grouped by function are the managers, then the specialists, then the workers
has intuitive appeal for creative entrepreneur
however, employees may be unclear about whom they report to and who is running the show
we are likely to see the popularity of the circular structure spread
effects of downsizing on organizations and employees
the leaner organization: downsizing
the goal of the new organizational forms we’ve described is to improve agility by creating a lean, focused, and flexible organization
downsizing is a systematic effort to make an organization leaner by selling off business units, closing locations, or reducing staff. its strategies include:
investment, communication, participation and assistence
five reasons structures differ
strategy
innovation strategy
a strategy that emphasixes the introduction of major new products and services
organic structure best
cost-minimization strategy
a strategy that emphasizes tight cost controls, avoidance of unnecessary innovation or marketing expensis, and price cutting
imitation strategy
a strategy that seeks to move into new products or new markets only after their viability has already been proven
mixture of the two types of structure
organizational size
as organizationas grow, employing 2,000 or more people, they become more mechanistic, more specialized, with rules and regulations
technology
how an organization transfers its inputs into outputs
the more routine the activites, the more mechanistic the structure with greater formalization
custom activities need an organic structure
environment
institutions or forces outside the organization that potentially affect organizations performance
three key dimensions: capacity, volatity, and complexity
institutions: another factor that shapes organizational structure
regulatory pressures
simple inertia
culture
fads or trends
insituttional pressures are often difficult to see specifically because we take them for granted, by that doesnt mean they arent powerful
three-dimentional environment model
capacity
the degree to which environment can support growth
volatility
the degree of instability in the environment
complexity
the degree of heterogeneity and concentration among environmental elements
organizational designs and employee behavior
impossible to generalize dues to individual differences in the employees
research findings
work specialization contributes to higher employee productivity, but it reduces job satisfaction
the benefits of specialization have decreased rapidly as employees seek more intrinsically rewarding jobs
no evidence suppots a relationship between span of control and employee satisfaction or performance
participation decision making in decentralized organizations is positively related to job satisfaction
people seek and stay at organizations that match their needs
global implications
culture and organizational structure
many countries follow the US model
US management may be too individualistic
culture and employee structure prefernces
cultures with high-power distance may prefer mechanistic structures
cultures and the boundaryless organization
may be a solution to regional differences in global firms
breaks down cultural barriers, especially in strategic alliances
telecommuting also blurs oranizational boundaries