A

A24 — Founding Story & Industry Context

Scene Setting: Greenwich Village Café, Summer 2012

  • Time & Place
    • "Summer 2012, New York City"; specifically inside a Greenwich Village café.
    • Daniel Katz, age 35, waits at a table—coffee untouched, signaling nervous anticipation.
  • Participants
    • Daniel Katz – film financier at Guggenheim Partners.
    • David Fenkel – co-founder of Oscilloscope Laboratories.
    • John Hodges – Head of Development at Big Beach Films.
  • Immediate Context
    • Daniel has just returned from Italy, where an epiphany struck him while driving the Autostrada 24 (A24).
    • The trio meets so Daniel can pitch “something big.”

Catalyst Conversation: Remembering “Fargo”

  • Daniel’s Opening Gambit
    • Asks: “Do you remember what it felt like the first time you watched Fargo?”
  • Reflections on Distinctive Cinema
    • Fargo: absurdist black-comedy crime film; protagonist arrives 30 minutes in—an unconventional structure.
    • Similar reactions cited for Miller’s Crossing; revered directors: the Coen Brothers, Jim Jarmusch, John Sayles, Kevin Smith, Richard Linklater.
  • Point Made
    • Hollywood once championed singular authorial voices—the “auteurs”—but that lane has narrowed.

Industry Diagnosis: Hollywood’s 2010-Era Slump

  • Observed Problems
    • Dominance of sequels, prequels, and superhero franchises.
    • Major studios (Paramount, Twentieth Century, Universal, etc.) over-serve their most profitable customers, sidelining risk and originality.
    • New indie talents (e.g., so-called “mumblecore” filmmakers) have limited distribution reach.
  • Missing Marketplace Player
    • Miramax & Fox Searchlight once championed indie voices in the 1990s; no clear equivalent in 2012.

The Epiphany: Autostrada 24 ➔ “A24”

  • Moment of Insight
    • While driving toward Rome on the Italian highway Autostrada 24, Daniel realizes he could start a new company to revive daring cinema.
  • Early Resistance & Risk Acknowledgment
    • Independent-studio success-rate described as “next to nothing.”
    • Expected film grosses: maybe 20{,}000{,}000 total—deemed unsustainable by skeptics.
  • Commitment Sealed
    • Daniel, David, and John decide: “What’s stopping us?”
    • Name chosen: “A24,” honoring the very road where inspiration struck.

Founders’ Biographical Snapshots

  • Daniel Katz
    • Born “late 1970s”; dual loves of business & film.
    • Influenced by 1990s indie wave: Linklater, Soderbergh, Smith, Tarantino, Coens.
    • Career Timeline
    • 1999: Hired at Lionsgate Films (NYC).
    • 2001: Lionsgate closes NYC office; jumps to THINKFilm.
    • 2004: Promoted to Vice President of Acquisitions.
    • 2006 (end): Pitches Guggenheim Partners on a film fund.
    • 2007: Begins leading Guggenheim’s film-investment arm.
    • 2012: Takes Italian vacation → conceives A24.
  • David Fenkel
    • Co-founded Oscilloscope Laboratories.
    • Notable distributed titles: Exit Through the Gift Shop (2010) and We Need to Talk About Kevin (disturbing, critically acclaimed).
    • Former colleague of Daniel at THINKFilm; bonded over 1990s cinephilia.
  • John Hodges
    • NY indie veteran; Head of Production & Development at Big Beach Films.
    • Produced Little Miss Sunshine (2006) — Sundance darling & critical hit.

Vision & Philosophy for A24

  • Mission Statements
    • Prioritize artistic creativity and storytelling authenticity.
    • Elevate new voices or long-overlooked auteurs.
    • “Shake up” a complacent Hollywood ecosystem.
  • Strategy Choice: Distributor First, Producer Later
    • Focus initial capital on acquiring finished films to mitigate risk while accruing brand credibility.
    • Maintain creative integrity by funding after seeing a film’s realized vision.

Mechanics of Film Distribution (Why It’s Hard)

  • Distributor Responsibilities
    • Oversee release, marketing, and licensing; secure theatrical slots.
  • Competitive Disadvantage vs. “Big Six” Studios
    • Major studios wield far greater budgets for prints, advertising (P&A), and theater relationships.
    • Indies rely on film-festival buzz, word-of-mouth, creative grassroots marketing.
  • David-vs-Goliath Analogy
    • A24 must out-maneuver incumbents via taste-making and curation rather than sheer spend.

Early Cultural & Financial Stakes

  • Founders’ Reality Check
    • Entering 2012 as an indie distributor is “almost dead on arrival” given the market’s tilt.
    • Personal reputations and finances on the line; potential for “financial ruin.”
  • Yet, the Potential Upside
    • Hollywood audiences “underserved” and “hungry” for authentic stories.
    • An opening exists to become the new beacon of auteur-driven cinema, analogous to Miramax (1990s) or United Artists (1970s).

Key Examples & References (Cultural Touchstones)

  • Landmark Independent Titles Cited
    • Clerks, Dazed and Confused, Fargo, Miller’s Crossing.
  • Emerging Film Movements
    • “Mumblecore” (ultra-low-budget, dialogue-heavy realism) recognized but under-distributed.
  • Documentary & Risky Fiction Projects Highlighted
    • Born Into Brothels: Calcutta’s Red Light Kids — child-prostitution documentary.
    • Half Nelson — friendship between drug-addicted teacher and student; early Ryan Gosling role.

Systemic Issues Identified within Major Studios

  • Centralized Decision-Making
    • Executives hold tight control over development, production, and marketing.
    • Risk-averse culture prioritizes franchises over innovation.
  • Profit‐First Mandate
    • Studios focus on content that appeals to widest, highest-spending demographics.
    • Smaller, challenging films deemed low ROI, hence marginalized.

Ethical & Philosophical Implications

  • Artistic Integrity vs. Commercial Demand
    • A24 positions itself morally/artistically against formulaic blockbusters.
    • Champions representation of diverse, authentic human experiences.
  • Industry Disruption Narrative
    • Echoes broader conversations in tech/start-up culture: small, agile entrants vs. complacent incumbents.

Looking Forward (Prelude to Group Activity)

  • A24’s early years will showcase whether passion + smart curation can defeat structural disadvantages.
  • Participants are encouraged to explore the provided appendix for
    • Critical data, case studies, and next-step instructions.
    • Future discussions will assess how A24’s later slate (e.g., Moonlight, Hereditary, Everything Everywhere All at Once) confirmed or contradicted the founding thesis.