Understanding the research cycle is fundamental in the field of research methods.
Definition: A paradigm is a set of beliefs that shapes the way one makes sense of the world.
Four Basic Paradigms in Science (Guba and Lincoln):
Positivism
Post-positivism
Critical Theory
Constructivism
Positivism/Post-positivism: Assumes an objective reality that can be understood through objective findings.
Critical/Constructivist Paradigms:
Rejects an 'objective' truth, perceiving the world as constantly changing and subjective.
Positivist and Post-positivist: Typically use quantitative methodologies.
Critical Theory and Constructivism: Typically use qualitative methodologies.
Qualitative Research Questions Must Be:
Descriptive: What is happening?
Exploratory: How are things working?
Explanatory: Why are things working as they are?
Data Types:
Qualitative Data: Text
Quantitative Data: Numbers
Role of Researcher:
Qualitative: Researcher is part of reality.
Quantitative: Researcher is outside of reality.
Epistemology:
Qualitative: Interpretive
Quantitative: Positivistic
Goal:
Qualitative: Depth
Quantitative: Breadth (generalization)
Methods:
Qualitative: Interviews, observations, document analysis.
Quantitative: Surveys, statistical analysis.
What do I see?
How am I going to study it?
What do I miss?
Positivism
Postpositivism
Critical Theory
Constructivism
Realism: Reality independent of human consciousness.
Apprehendable: Reality is observable.
Relativism: Reality is not independent but dependent upon other factors.
Dialogic: Focus on dialogue.
Dialectical: Dialogue between differing viewpoints.
Hermeneutical: Emphasizes interpretation.
Ontology: The way you see the world.
Epistemology: The way you study the world.
Methodology: The methods used for research.
Reliable
Valid
Objective
Replicable
Paradigm | Ontology | Epistemology | Methodology |
---|---|---|---|
Positivism | Naïve realism | Objective | Experimental |
Postpositivism | Critical realism | Modified objective | Modified experimental |
Critical Theory | Historical realism | Subjective | Dialogic and dialectical |
Constructivism | Relativism | Subjective | Hermeneutical and dialectical |
Communicative validation
Triangulation
Validation of interview settings
Authenticity
Postmodern rejections and first-person writing style.
Closed interview
Open interview
Semi-structured interview
Narrative interview
Life history interview
Focus group interview
Mental mapping
Go-along interview
To obtain information, opinions, experiences, locations, emotions, and behaviors.
Goal of Opinion: Least interesting due to limited value.
Elite interviews
Expert interviews
Stakeholder interviews
Elite Interviews:
Can have formal/informal roles.
Provide institutional information.
Hold power in policy and planning.
Expert Interviews:
Hold scientific/practice knowledge.
Were involved in prior research.
Why?
How?
How many?
Representative?
Who is the best person for information about this problem?
Useful for surveys to ensure representativeness.
Empirical Saturation: No new data emerges.
Theoretical Saturation: All operational elements filled with data.
Introduction, follow-ups, probing, specifying, direct, indirect, structuring questions.
Obtaining informed consent.
Making agreements on anonymity and quotes.
Taping interviews if allowed.
Closed Interview: Limited improvisation, direct structure.
Semi-Structured Interview: More room for follow-up and probing questions.
Prepare item list.
Clear and understandable.
Directly related to the topic.
Ask one question at a time.
Avoid assumptions and leading questions.
Use acceptable terms in community vernacular.
Phrased as open-ended invitations.
An interview that asks for a story.
Used to understand processes and perspectives.
Prepare starting questions and topics.
Essential to ensure open dialogue and sharing.
Context and performance description of storytelling.
Understand subjective perceptions.
Insight into bureaucratic strategies vs. everyday experiences.
Be present and ask descriptive questions.
Analyze narrative and mapping relationship.
Gaining access and observing.
Conversing and gathering documents.
Making fieldnotes.
Immersive social setting observation.
Understanding urban social life and influences on space.
Emic: Local perspective.
Etic: Observer's perspective.
Subjectivity and lack of validation compared to quantitative studies.
Thick description of social interactions.
Unit of analysis, places to observe, and interview subjects.
Fieldnotes, Diary, Logbook.
Should be descriptive, not value-loaded or vague.
Demonstrates credibility and systematic approach.
Flexible, captures themes, highlights discrepancies.
Familiarize with data.
Generate initial codes.
Search for themes.
Review themes.
Determine and name themes.
Produce a report.
Procedural ethics vs. ethics in practice.
Managing consent, objectivity, impact on individuals.
Analyze the impact of researcher's role.
Essential components: Research Question, Concepts, Methods.
Facilitate personal research and understanding.
Random and representative samples for valid conclusions.
Dependent (Y) vs. Independent (X) variables.
Types include spurious, mediation, moderation.
Nominal: No order; Ordinal: Has order.
Examples: Gender (nominal), Education Level (ordinal).
Applicable when the dependent variable is continuous.
Dummy codes for inclusion.
Popular for binary outcomes; includes coefficients interpretations.
Selecting by attribute/location, adding fields, analyzing geometry.
Distance calculations, reclassifying data, zonal statistics.
Raster-GIS more accurate for population data due to its resolution.
GIS is powerful in analyzing urban issues when applied critically alongside various research methods.