HM

Lecture 2: Individual Theories

Theories of Individual Deviant Behavior

The Classical School of Crime and Deviance (Cesare Beccaria)

  • Individuals possess three basic characteristics:

    • Free Will: Actions are voluntary.

    • Rationality: Acts involve conscious, voluntary, and deliberate processes.

    • Manipulability: People are driven by the hedonistic principle (maximize pleasure, minimize pain).

Rational Choice Theory (Cornish and Clarke)

  • Deviant acts are voluntary, resulting from rational decisions balancing benefits and costs.

  • Situational Choice Theory: Environmental factors influence decision-making; attractive situations increase benefits and minimize costs.

    • Target hardening: Securing targets or making them less available decreases deviant acts, potentially leading to crime displacement.

Routine Activities Theory (Cohen & Felson)

  • Illegal activities feed upon legal routine activities, affecting the location, type, and quantity of illegal acts.

  • Structural changes influence crime rates by affecting the convergence of 3 minimal elements for direct-contact predatory violations:

    • Motivated Offender

    • Suitable Target: Defined by value, physical visibility, access, and inertia.

    • Absence of Capable Guardians: Someone or something capable of preventing the event.

  • Convergence of these elements in time and space can increase crime rates without changes in individual motivation.

  • Other premises:

    • Exposure: Increased exposure leads to increased victimization risk.

    • Proximity: Closer proximity of targets to motivated offenders increases victimization risk.

    • Properties of Crimes: Less certain material gains from crime make exposure, proximity, and guardianship more critical.

    • Household and family activities entail a lower risk of criminal victimization.

  • Higher victimization expected for:

    • Single-adult households

    • Those employed outside the home

    • Younger individuals

    • Single individuals

Societal Reaction or Labeling Perspective

Symbolic Interaction Theory (Cooley)
  • Looking-Glass Self: Our self-perception reflects what we think others think of us; the self is a social construction.

Symbolic Interaction Theory (Mead)
  • Child develops self-sense through gestures and symbols, giving meaning to others' communication.

  • Taking the Role of the Other: Ability to view oneself from another's perspective, a lifelong process where negative early labeling can have adverse long-term effects.

Labeling and Escalation of Deviant Behavior (Tannenbaum)
  • Labeling of juvenile acts, then the juveniles themselves.

  • Dramatization of Evil: Labeling leads to ostracization, association with other labeled individuals, increasing continued involvement in delinquency.

Societal Reaction Theory (Lemert, Howard Becker)
  • Lemert's 2 stages of deviance:

    • Primary Deviance: Minor norm violations; formal response (e.g., arrest) applies a deviant label.

    • Secondary Deviance: Publicly known primary deviance leads to negative labeling, prompting further deviance as a response.

  • Becker's Deviance as a Social Creation:

    • Social groups create deviance by making rules, applying them, and labeling individuals as outsiders.

    • 3 stages:

      1. Act/behavior is defined as deviant.

      2. An actor is defined as a deviant person.

      3. Actor accepts the deviant label and defines self as deviant (most important).

Self-Derogation (Howard Kaplan)
  • Process of accepting negative judgments from others.

  • Individuals unable to establish a positive self-sense may seek alternate means (e.g., gangs) for self-esteem.

  • Related to stigmatization and disintegrative shaming.

Reintegrative Shaming (John Braithwaite)
  • The community disapproves of the behavior but maintains respect for the individual.

  • Values the offender as a person and aims for reintegration into society (rehabilitation over retribution).

Control Theory

Hirschi's Social Control Theory
  • Strong bonds to social groups reduce the likelihood of deviant acts, based on 4 elements:

    • Attachment: Affection for and sensitivity to others.

    • Commitment: Rational investment in conventional society (stake in conformity).

    • Involvement: Participation in conventional activities.

    • Beliefs: Acceptance of societal rules and obligation to obey them.

Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime
  • Low self-control + opportunity = crime (immediate gratification).

  • Focuses on childhood socialization producing enduring low self-control.

  • Self-control levels remain stable over the life course.

  • Low self-control consists of the followingthe following traits:

    1. Impulsivity

    2. Preference for simple tasks

    3. Risk-seeking

    4. Preference for physical activity

    5. Self-centeredness

    6. Temper (low frustration tolerance, weak verbal conflict resolution)

  • Crime opportunity: Situations where force or fraud yield immediate, easy pleasure with low risk of detection or resistance.

  • Motivation to commit a crime is not a variable; differences among individuals are level of self-control and access to opportunities.

Developmental/Life Course Approach (Sampson and Laub)

  • Examines the emergence, persistence, and desistance of deviant activities.

  • Trajectories: Long-term patterns of behavior throughout life (e.g., marriage, work, criminal behavior).

  • Transitions: Short-term events embedded in trajectories (e.g., getting married, new job, prison).

  • Transitions can lead to turning points by changing the social bond between the individual and society, especially for criminals (increased bonding to conventional society decreases criminal behavior).

  • Strengthened social bonds lead to increased social capital (positive relationships with society/institutions) and decreased involvement in crime/deviance (more to lose).