Argument Forms
Argument Forms
- Definition: Argument forms are structured expressions indicating a relationship of premises leading to a conclusion.
Different Arguments - Same Form
Example 1:
- (P1) Lady Gaga will win the next presidential election or Kylie Jenner will win the next presidential election.
- (P2) Kylie Jenner won’t win the next presidential election.
- (C) Therefore, Lady Gaga will win the next presidential election.
Example 2:
- (P1) My cup contains tea or my cup contains coffee.
- (P2) My cup doesn’t contain coffee.
- (C) Therefore, my cup contains tea.
Examples of Valid Argument Forms
- Common Structure:
- (P1) Sentence 1 or Sentence 2.
- (P2) Not Sentence 2.
- (C) Therefore, Sentence 1.
Valid vs Invalid Argument Forms
Valid Argument: All derived arguments remain valid.
Invalid Argument: At least one derived argument is invalid.
Example of Invalid Argument:
- (P1) Sentence 1 or Sentence 2.
- (P2) Sentence 2.
- (C) Therefore, Sentence 1.
- Instance: (P1) Joaquin Phoenix is president or Joe Biden is president.
- (P2) Joe Biden is president.
- (C) Therefore, Joaquin Phoenix is president.
Irreplaceable Logical Expressions
- Cannot replace logical terms without altering the meaning:
- "or" must not be replaced with "because".
- Examples:
- (P1) Dogs bark or cats meow.
- (P2) It’s not the case that cats meow.
- (C) Therefore, dogs bark.
- In contrast, for "because":
- (P1) Dogs bark because cats meow.
- (P2) It’s not the case that cats meow.
- (C) Therefore, dogs bark.
Conditional Argument Forms
- Structure:
- (P1) If A, then B.
- (P2) A.
- (C) Therefore, B.
Expand and Don’t Collapse
- Expansion Rule:
- Expand when connecting two affirmative sentences:
- Example: "Egon and Selma are accountants" becomes "Egon is an accountant and Selma is an accountant".
- No Expansion when referring to a set:
- Example: "Erin and Jamie are a couple" remains as is; can't expand to individual specifics.
Logical Expressions
- Connections formed by the logical expressions:
- "and"
- "or"
- "not" (i.e., "it’s not the case that")
- "if…then"
- "if and only if"
Truth-functional
- Based on truth values of connected sentences.
- Example of truth table interpretation:
- If we ascertain truth values of components, we define the truth of the sentence as a whole.
Understanding Conditional Statements
- Structure:
- If P, then Q.
- Truth Conditions:
- Both are true: I am well, and I help you move.
- Antecedent true, consequent false: I am well, but I don't help you move.
- Antecedent false, consequent can be true/false: examples of broken promises regarding moving.
Truth Tables
Negation:
- Not P
- Truth Table:
- T (True) -> F (False)
- F (False) -> T (True)
Conjunction:
- P and Q
- Truth Table example:
- T and T = T
- Others = F
Disjunction:
- P or Q
- Truth Table example:
- T or T = T
- Others = F
Bi-Conditional:
- P if and only if Q
- Truth table outcomes determined by truth pairs.
Important Note
- Ensure that logical structures and expressions are accurately maintained to uphold validity in arguments and logic.