Civil liberties: Government cannot act; they are negative restraints that safeguard individual freedoms (speech, worship, press, assembly, petition).
Civil rights: Government must act; they are positive guarantees of equal treatment for everyone, especially members of protected classes (race, gender, ethnicity, religion, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, etc.).
Foundational implication
Civil liberties flow largely from the Bill of Rights and the Due Process Clauses (Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments).
Civil rights flow primarily from the Equal Protection Clause and subsequent statutes.
Equal Protection Clause and Constitutional Foundations
Text: “No State shall … deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” (Fourteenth Amendment, 1868).
Practical restatement: “Similarly situated individuals are treated similarly.”
Principles grounded in equality, fairness, and non-discrimination, yet not absolute—some discrimination allowed if constitutional tests are met (e.g., age restrictions on alcohol).
Discrimination: Definitions and Legal Framework
Discrimination: Unjust/prejudicial treatment of categories of people, esp. by race, age, sex.
Two analytic prongs the courts examine:
Discriminatory impact/effect – facially neutral law produces unequal outcomes.
Discriminatory purpose/intent – law enacted because of the unequal treatment it produces.
Example of lawful discrimination: age-based alcohol purchase limit (21+). Example of unlawful: race-exclusive hiring.
Levels of Scrutiny in Equal Protection Jurisprudence
Rational Basis Test (default)
Government action must be rationally related to a legitimate goal.
Burden: Challenger must prove no rational link.
Intermediate Scrutiny (gender/sex, legitimacy of birth, some immigration status)
Action must be substantially related to an important objective.
Burden: Government.
Strict Scrutiny (race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, fundamental rights)
Action must serve a compelling interest, be narrowly tailored, and use the least restrictive means.
Nearly always fatal to the challenged law.
Affirmative Action
Definition: Policies/programs intended to remedy historical discrimination and expand opportunities (education, employment) for marginalized groups.
Legal tightrope: Allowed if it meets strict or intermediate scrutiny (depending on category) and uses race/sex as a plus factor, not a quota (e.g., Regents v. Bakke, Grutter v. Bollinger).
Ethical debate: Equity vs. color-blind meritocracy, remedy vs. reverse discrimination.
Reconstruction Amendments
Thirteenth Amendment (1865)
Abolishes slavery and involuntary servitude except as criminal punishment.
Fourteenth Amendment (1868)
Birthright citizenship, Privileges or Immunities, Due Process (extends to states), Equal Protection.
Implies a right to travel among states.
Fifteenth Amendment (1870 – not explicitly in slides but context)
Poll taxes (receipt in Figure 5.6 shows 1 tax in 1917 Jefferson Parish, LA).
White-only primaries.
Result: Widespread disenfranchisement until mid-20th-century reforms.
Segregation (De Jure vs. De Facto)
De jure segregation: Mandated by law (e.g., separate schools, public facilities).
De facto segregation: Result of private decisions (housing patterns, economic factors).
Even under the Plessy “separate but equal” doctrine, facilities were overwhelmingly unequal (resource disparities favored Whites).
Iconic visuals
Burning of Freedmen’s school (Figure 5.3) demonstrates violent resistance.
Little Rock Nine (Figure 5.7): 1957 federal troops enforce integration.
African-American Civil Rights Movement
Post-WWII direct action: Bus boycotts, sit-ins, Freedom Rides, voter-registration drives.
Confrontations
“Bloody Sunday” on Edmund Pettus Bridge, Selma (1965) – televised brutality galvanized support.
Court breakthrough: Brown v. Board of Education (1954) overturns Plessy in education; declares segregation inherently unequal. Implementation met with “massive resistance” for decades.
Legislative landmarks
Civil Rights Act of 1964
• Bans discrimination in public accommodations, employment (creates EEOC), and unequal voting requirements.
• Constitutional hook: Congress’s Commerce Clause power, not solely Fourteenth Amendment.
Voting Rights Act of 1965 (Figure 5.1 signing)
• Suspends literacy tests, installs federal examiners, requires pre-clearance for jurisdictions with histories of discrimination.
Impacts and Legacy
Civil Rights Movement catalyzed subsequent pushes for equality:
Women’s liberation, American Indian Movement, Chicano/Latino activism, Asian-American redress, LGBTQIA+ rights.
Contemporary backlash: White supremacist resurgence (Charlottesville “Unite the Right,” 2017; Figure 5.10).
Women’s Suffrage and Women’s Rights
Early advocates: Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott (Figures 5.11 & 5.12) emerge from abolitionist circles.
Milestones
Western territories grant partial suffrage in late 1800s.
Nineteenth Amendment (1920): Prohibits sex-based voting denial; still limited by racial disenfranchisement until 1960s.
Equal Rights Amendment (ERA)
Proposed 1923, passed Congress 1972, required 38 states; deadline lapsed 1982 though Virginia ratified in 2020 (map Figure 5.14).
Second-wave feminism (1960s–1980s): Focus on workplace equality, reproductive rights, credit/property, Title IX, combatting sexual harassment.
Native American Civil Rights
Removal & Sovereignty Loss
Trail of Tears (1831–1838) (Figure 5.16 maps forced marches).
Citizenship progression
Indian Citizenship Act 1924 grants citizenship to Native Americans born after enactment; Nationality Act 1940 covers remaining.
Rights on reservations
Courts treat reservations as “quasi-sovereign”; Bill of Rights not automatically applied.
Indian Civil Rights Act 1968 extends many rights inside reservations.
Activism
AIM occupation of Wounded Knee (1973) – 71-day standoff; two deaths, 15 injuries (Figure 5.17).
Asian-American, Latino/Chicano, and Immigrant Movements
Asian-American exclusion
Naturalization barred until 1943 for Chinese; broader restrictions loosened post-WWII.
WWII Japanese internment (Figure 5.20); redress movement leads to Civil Liberties Act 1988 (not in slides but relevant link).
Latino/Chicano activism
Focus: Farmworker rights (César Chávez, Dolores Huerta), bilingual education, end to segregation (e.g., Mendez v. Westminster, 1947), immigration reform.
Immigrant rights demands: Anti-trafficking, due process in deportations, Deferred Action (DACA) for undocumented youth.
LGBTQ+ Rights
Early criminalization: All 50 states outlaw same-sex acts pre-1960s; laws also target gender-nonconforming dress.
Movement spark: Stonewall riots (1969) though not named in slides.
Legal milestones
Lawrence v. Texas (2003) invalidates remaining sodomy laws under Fourteenth Amendment privacy and liberty.
Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) mandates nationwide marriage equality (Figure 5.21 celebration).
Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) (referenced): Title VII bars employment discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
Intersectionality: Many individuals belong to multiple marginalized identities; discrimination can be compounded.
Federalism tension: State autonomy vs. national enforcement (e.g., federal troops in Little Rock; pre-clearance under VRA).
Commerce Clause as civil-rights engine: Used when Fourteenth Amendment limits reach of Congress over private actors (e.g., CRA 1964 on businesses).
Scrutiny tiers as gatekeepers: Litigation strategy often hinges on framing classification into strict or intermediate scrutiny.
Backlash dynamics: Each advance (Reconstruction, Civil Rights, Marriage Equality) triggers counter-mobilization (Jim Crow, Massive Resistance, religious-freedom bills).
Moral arc narrative: Figures of emancipation (Lincoln – Figure 5.4), civil-rights icons (King, Lewis), and protesters illustrate the long struggle bending toward justice but requiring vigilance.