Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals
KANT'S GROUNDWORK OF THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS
APPROACHES TO KANT
Define Good Will
Articulate Principles (Agent Centered, Respect)
Distinguish Instrumental vs. Intrinsic Value
Discuss The Imperatives
RESPECT
Definition: View others as having status
Status relates to value independent of use or consequences
Manifested through attitudes but not strictly behaviors
VALUE
Valuable things include talents, gifts, and virtues
Kant asserts nothing is good without qualification; only good when serving a higher purpose
MEANS/END DISTINCTION
Ends: Goals; Means: Methods to achieve goals
Value derived from purpose (ends) determines value of means
Not all goals are equally valuable; some manifestly evil
VALUING A THING
Normative distinction: value attributed based on external vs. intrinsic qualities
External: relational uses; Intrinsic: inherent qualities
Instrumental value vs. intrinsic value (e.g., education vs. tools)
FEAR AND RESPECT
Fear involves regarding others as threats; behaviors are self-interested
Changing context reveals true value attributed to others
INTRINSIC VALUE OF PERSONS
Persons set ends and thus hold intrinsic value
Free will is fundamental to personhood and moral respect
HUMAN WILL
Two types of volitions:
Inclinations (phenomenal realm)
Reason (realm of will/understanding)
MAXIMS
Subjective rules of conduct based on personal intentions
Properly formulated maxims include aims, means, and circumstances
THE GOOD WILL
A will free from external influences, guided by reason
The Good Will is autonomous and reflects rationality
IMPERATIVES
Distinction between acting from duty vs. acting in accordance with duty
Imperatives are maxims recognized as laws, guiding moral behavior
DUTY
Defined as necessity to act per the Moral Law
Duty has an absolute quality; rationalizations for failure are inadequate
THE GOOD AND THE RIGHTEOUS
The Good: actions based on feelings; The Righteous: actions based on moral laws
TYPES OF IMPERATIVES
Hypothetical: Conditional duties
Categorical: Unconditional duties; Only one Categorical Imperative exists
ORDERING THE WILL
Human will influenced by inclinations and reason
Maxims represent personal principles, while imperatives represent objective laws
THREE FORMULATIONS OF THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
Universal Law Formulation: Act only if maxim can become universal law
Ends Formulation: Treat humanity always as an end, never merely as a means
Kingdom of Ends Formulation: View oneself and others as members of a moral community
LYING
Universally, lying treats oneself as exempt from moral laws
Under Means/End, lying manipulates others and disregards their dignity
In Kingdom of Ends, lying denies others full membership in the moral community