0.0(0)

ethical framworks

Introduction to Ethical Frameworks

  • All ethical frameworks consider consequences.

  • Distinction between consequentialism and other ethical frameworks.

Deontological Ethics

  • Definition: Focus on duty and what one ought to do regardless of outcomes.

  • Main sources of duty include:

    • Commands from a competent authority (e.g., divine command).

    • Human reason and natural law (highlighted by Thomas Aquinas).

  • Duty is not derived solely from divine command due to issues of trust in God.

    • In a pluralistic society, the source of duty is often mutual human experience rather than divine command.

Natural Law

  • Draws from reason and revelation.

  • Aligns moral decisions with natural inclinations.

  • Catholic view includes both scripture and tradition as revelations.

Ethical Frameworks and Authority

  • Different religious sects (Catholic vs. Protestant) may interpret ethics based on their understanding of scripture and tradition.

  • Importance of forming conscience through a combination of natural inclination and understanding of scripture.

Kantian Ethics

  • Utilizes the Categorical Imperative which emphasizes acting according to universalizable maxims.

  • Focuses on duty rather than the outcomes of actions.

  • Challenges the notion that ethical decisions can be solely outcome-driven.

Eudaimonia and Human Flourishing

  • Eudaimonia refers to a state of flourishing and well-being.

  • Happiness can be separated from economic or material success.

    • The aim should be to engage in activities that fulfill and foster personal growth, not merely profit.

Critique of Utilitarianism

  • Utilitarianism aims for the maximization of pleasure or happiness, but often overlooks individual rights and the inherent dignity of persons.

  • The potential for exploitation or harm to marginalized groups in the name of maximizing happiness for the greater number.

  • Contrasts with Kantian ethics which treats all individuals as ends and not as means to an end.

Teleological vs. Consequentialist Ethics

  • Teleological ethics (including deontological) focus on purposes and outcomes as part of ethical considerations, but do not define goodness solely by outcomes.

  • Consequentialism exclusively ties ethical values to outcomes.

Ethical Decision-Making Examples and Complexities

  • Example of the Trolley Problem: Makes clear the tension between deontological (duty-based) and consequentialist (outcome-based) ethics.

  • Ethical dilemmas often highlight the complexities and ambiguity in moral decision-making.

Examining the Trolley Problem

  • Choices must be made in life-or-death situations—e.g., sacrificing one to save multiple others raises profound moral questions.

  • Decisions are shaped by various factors, including societal norms, individual belonging to communities, and personal beliefs.

Note on Ethical Framework Applications

  • Every ethical framework must incorporate community values and societal agreements as foundational.

  • Modern ethics increasingly navigates beyond individualistic interpretations that emerged during the Enlightenment.

Atonement Theories in Christian Ethics

  • Atonement theories provide context for understanding Christian moral obligations.

  • Key Atonement Theories:

    • Ransom Theory: Spiritual slavery and redemption through Christ’s sacrifice.

    • Recapitulation Theory: Christ as reconciling humanity, contrasting Adam's disobedience with Christ's obedience.

    • Satisfaction Theory: Focus on satisfying divine justice.

    • Moral Exemplar Theory: Jesus as a model for ethical behavior.

    • Healing Theory: Jesus’ role in spiritual healing and restoration.

Implications of Ethical Theories

  • Each theory carries ethical implications about human behavior, responsibility, and the nature of sin and redemption.

  • Exploration of individual and social identities shaped by these theological frameworks is crucial.

Conclusion

  • Ethical frameworks must consider a balance of consequences, community, and duties.

  • Continuous dialogue in ethics is essential for understanding moral responsibilities and implications within diverse contexts.

0.0(0)
robot