All ethical frameworks consider consequences.
Distinction between consequentialism and other ethical frameworks.
Definition: Focus on duty and what one ought to do regardless of outcomes.
Main sources of duty include:
Commands from a competent authority (e.g., divine command).
Human reason and natural law (highlighted by Thomas Aquinas).
Duty is not derived solely from divine command due to issues of trust in God.
In a pluralistic society, the source of duty is often mutual human experience rather than divine command.
Draws from reason and revelation.
Aligns moral decisions with natural inclinations.
Catholic view includes both scripture and tradition as revelations.
Different religious sects (Catholic vs. Protestant) may interpret ethics based on their understanding of scripture and tradition.
Importance of forming conscience through a combination of natural inclination and understanding of scripture.
Utilizes the Categorical Imperative which emphasizes acting according to universalizable maxims.
Focuses on duty rather than the outcomes of actions.
Challenges the notion that ethical decisions can be solely outcome-driven.
Eudaimonia refers to a state of flourishing and well-being.
Happiness can be separated from economic or material success.
The aim should be to engage in activities that fulfill and foster personal growth, not merely profit.
Utilitarianism aims for the maximization of pleasure or happiness, but often overlooks individual rights and the inherent dignity of persons.
The potential for exploitation or harm to marginalized groups in the name of maximizing happiness for the greater number.
Contrasts with Kantian ethics which treats all individuals as ends and not as means to an end.
Teleological ethics (including deontological) focus on purposes and outcomes as part of ethical considerations, but do not define goodness solely by outcomes.
Consequentialism exclusively ties ethical values to outcomes.
Example of the Trolley Problem: Makes clear the tension between deontological (duty-based) and consequentialist (outcome-based) ethics.
Ethical dilemmas often highlight the complexities and ambiguity in moral decision-making.
Choices must be made in life-or-death situations—e.g., sacrificing one to save multiple others raises profound moral questions.
Decisions are shaped by various factors, including societal norms, individual belonging to communities, and personal beliefs.
Every ethical framework must incorporate community values and societal agreements as foundational.
Modern ethics increasingly navigates beyond individualistic interpretations that emerged during the Enlightenment.
Atonement theories provide context for understanding Christian moral obligations.
Key Atonement Theories:
Ransom Theory: Spiritual slavery and redemption through Christ’s sacrifice.
Recapitulation Theory: Christ as reconciling humanity, contrasting Adam's disobedience with Christ's obedience.
Satisfaction Theory: Focus on satisfying divine justice.
Moral Exemplar Theory: Jesus as a model for ethical behavior.
Healing Theory: Jesus’ role in spiritual healing and restoration.
Each theory carries ethical implications about human behavior, responsibility, and the nature of sin and redemption.
Exploration of individual and social identities shaped by these theological frameworks is crucial.
Ethical frameworks must consider a balance of consequences, community, and duties.
Continuous dialogue in ethics is essential for understanding moral responsibilities and implications within diverse contexts.