Summarize the conceptual basis and degree of empirical support for work motivation theories.
Compare and contrast the work motivation theories presented.
Provide an overview and synthesis of work motivation theories.
Discuss practical examples of applying motivational strategies.
Specifies three forms of motivation driving achievement behaviors:
Intrinsic Motivation: Engaging in behavior for inherent pleasure (e.g., exercising for fun).
Amotivation: Lack of intention to engage in behavior (absence of motivation).
Extrinsic Motivation: Behaviors driven by external rewards rather than inherent pleasure.
Types of Extrinsic Motivation
External Regulation: Actions performed to satisfy external demands or rewards (e.g., Skinner's operant theory).
Introjected Regulation: Internalization of regulations not fully accepted as one’s own; behaviors driven by guilt or desire for ego enhancement.
Identified Regulation: Acknowledgment of the importance of the behavior, though it may not be intrinsically enjoyable.
Integrated Regulation: Values and behaviors are fully assimilated and aligned but still directed at external outcomes.
Leaders can encourage positive motivation through satisfying psychological needs:
Autonomy: Providing choice and feeling control over actions.
Competence: Feeling effective in tasks.
Relatedness: Feeling connected to others and accepted.
Autonomy Support:
Offer choices in tasks.
Provide rationale for tasks.
Check for understanding and invite feedback.
Competence Support (Structure):
Provide feedback on performance.
Cater to different learning styles (e.g., demonstrations).
Reward effort as well as outcomes.
Relatedness Support:
Make time for team members, listen to ideas.
Foster enthusiasm and peer collaboration.
Actions that undermine psychological needs include:
Thwarting Autonomy: Removing choices, pushing decisions.
Thwarting Competence: Negative feedback and overly critical behavior.
Thwarting Relatedness: Ignoring team inputs or dismissing ideas.
Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale (MWMS) developed to assess motivation types across various countries and languages.
Constructs measured include autonomy, competence, relatedness which correlate with work outcomes; e.g., well-being, commitment.
Core Concept: Motivation is impacted by perceptions of fairness in input/output ratios compared to others.
Inputs: Investments like effort, skill, time, integrity.
Outcomes: Pay, recognition, benefits.
Equity vs. Inequity: Equity leads to positive motivation; inequity generates tension and motivates change.
Responses to Perceived Inequity
Actions may include:
Reducing inputs (e.g., decreased effort).
Seeking to change outcomes (e.g., demanding a raise).
Distorting perceptions to feel less inequitable.
Choosing different comparison targets or leaving the situation.
Organizational Justice and Equity Theory
Distributive Justice: Fairness in outcomes and rewards.
Procedural Justice: Fairness in process; more significantly influences commitment and trust.
Motivation is driven by three components:
Expectancy: Belief that effort will lead to performance.
Instrumentality: Belief performance leads to outcomes.
Valence: Value placed on outcomes.
Motivation Formula: M = E imes I imes V (where M = motivation, E = expectancy, I = instrumentality, V = valence).
Effective goals should be SMART: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound.
Goals impact direction, intensity, and persistence of effort, influencing overall performance.
Self-efficacy: Confidence in one's capabilities enhances goal attainment.
Five core dimensions affect motivation:
Skill Variety: Range of different skills required.
Task Identity: Completing identifiable work.
Task Significance: Impact of the job on others.
Autonomy: Freedom in how to perform the job.
Feedback: Clarity on performance effectiveness.
Motivation potential formula: MPS = (Skill Variety + Task Identity + Task Significance) / 3 imes Autonomy imes Feedback
Moderators: Personal knowledge, growth need strength, and satisfaction.
Needs Theory (Maslow): Lacks strong empirical support.
Expectancy Theory: Moderate to high validity.
Equity Theory: Major emphasis on perceptions of inequity.
Goal-setting Theory: Well-supported by empirical evidence.
SDT: High validity in exploring intrinsic motivation.
Theories can synergize rather than compete; points of motivational concern can guide interventions.
Filling gaps in motivational perceptions (equity, expectancy, goals, basic psychological needs).