Motivation III
Motivation III Notes
Date & Venue
Date: Friday, January 16th, 2025
Location: KPER 2540
Instructor: Dr. Shaelyn Strachan
Review from Last Class
Discussion around Rob, who is considered to maintain a healthy weight and does not feel the need to lose weight; thus, sees no value in exercising.
Theory of Planned Behaviour Variables Discussed:
Attitudes: Personal beliefs about behavior.
Subjective Norms: Perceived social pressures.
Perceived Behavioural Control: Beliefs about how easy/difficult a behavior is to perform.
Intentions: Plans to perform a behavior.
Question Examined: Which variable best explains why Rob doesn’t exercise?
Case Study on Lee
Profile of Lee: Unfit individual who hires a personal trainer for intensive workouts.
After a few tough sessions, Lee experiences soreness and anticipates the next workout negatively, impacting his confidence.
Self-Efficacy Theory Discussion:
Sources of self-efficacy that may affect confidence include:
Past Experience/Mastery Experience: Previous successes leading to confidence.
Vicarious Experience: Observing others and believing in personal capabilities based on that.
Social Persuasion: Feedback from others that encourages and motivates.
Physiological/Affective States: Emotional and physical feelings affecting performance and self-belief.
Question Examined: What source best explains Lee’s declining self-efficacy?
Concept of Self-Efficacy
Definition: Belief in one’s capabilities to organize and execute actions required to manage prospective situations.
Review of Theories Discussed
Theory of Planned Behaviour
Social Cognitive Theory
Self-Efficacy Theory
Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985)
Overview: A comprehensive theory regarding human motivation and development.
Focuses on the autonomy of behaviors versus external control.
Key Focus: How behaviors are adopted of one’s own volition versus being controlled by external agents (e.g., rewards, punishments).
Sub-Structures: The theory is comprised of five sub-theories; emphasis will be placed on two.
Cognitive Evaluation Theory
Intrinsic Motivation: Engaging in a behavior for its own sake, experiencing self-reward.
Key Constructs Influencing Intrinsic Motivation:
Competence: The feeling of being effective in one’s actions.
Autonomy: The feeling that activities are self-chosen and align with personal values.
Social Contexts Impact: Influence on intrinsic motivation can lead to negative consequences.
Detrimental Factors:
Social Pressure
Negative Reinforcement
Threat or Punishment
Competition
Rewards can undermine intrinsic motivation unless experienced in a non-controlling manner (e.g., informational rewards, unexpected rewards).
Research Example (Medic et al., 2007)
Study Context: Examined the motivation of collegiate basketball players in relation to scholarship pressures.
Findings: The dependency on scholarships correlated with a decrease in reported intrinsic motivation for basketball.
Relevance to Self-Determination Theory: External pressure may diminish intrinsic motivation as per cognitive evaluation theory.
Citation: Medic, N., Mack, D.E., Wilson, P.M. & Starkes, J.L. (2007). The effects of athletic scholarships on motivation in sport. Journal of Sport Behaviour, 30(3), 292-306.
Beneficial Factors for Intrinsic Motivation
References include:
Deci, E., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Ryan, R.M. (2017). Cognitive Evaluation Theory, Part I. In R.M. Ryan (ed.), The Handbook of Self-Determination Theory.
Organismic Integration Theory
Overview: Addresses the various forms of extrinsic motivation; differentiating between engaging in an activity for reasons beyond the enjoyment itself.
Extrinsic Motivation Spectrum: Ranges from a lack of motivation (Amotivation) to forms that are more integrated with personal values.
Terminology:
Intrinsic Motivation: Engaging for inherent enjoyment
Integrated Regulation: Aligning behavior with self-identity.
Identified Regulation: Activities pursued due to personal importance.
Introjected Regulation: Engaging to avoid feelings of guilt or obligation.
External Regulation: Actions driven by desire for external rewards or avoidance of punishment.
Amotivation: Absence of intention or motivation.
Motivational Continuum
Scale from Low to High Self-Determination:
Transitioning from Amotivation through various extrinsic forms to intrinsic motivation.
Importance of Motivation Quality
Research Findings: In sports and exercise, higher quality motivation (intrinsic, integrated, identified) is linked to positive outcomes in persistence, performance, and well-being.
Strategies to Enhance Motivation Along the Self-Determination Continuum
Meeting the Three Psychological Needs:
Autonomy: Creating opportunities for choices that align with personal preferences.
Competence: Ensuring activities are appropriately challenging and foster growth.
Relatedness: Fostering connections and care in social contexts related to activities.
Individual Actions:
Choose challenging goals, engage in environments fostering social connections, and practice supportive self-talk.
Involve family and friends in exercise/sport activities.
Recap of Self-Determination Theory
Cognitive Evaluation Theory: Focus on intrinsic motivation influenced by social environments.
Organismic Integration Theory: Defines a range of motivations from amotivation to intrinsic and various forms of extrinsic motivations.
Unfocused Theories: Basic Psychological Needs Theory, outlining autonomy, competence, and relatedness as essential for self-determination in actions.