The Catholic Church is often divided between liberal and conservative Catholics.
Cardinal Francis George offered a third way, a balanced perspective.
Bishop Robert Barron discusses Cardinal George's views and their relevance today.
Father Joseph Fesio is the founder of Ignatius Press.
He knew Henri de Lubac, Hans Urs von Balthasar, and Joseph Ratzinger personally.
Fesio played a key role in bringing their thought into the mainstream.
Story: An elderly Cardinal de Lubac humbly served Fesio's Mass in Paris.
Ro Khanna is a congressman representing Silicon Valley (District 17, California).
His district includes Apple, Google, and Facebook.
Khanna is a Democrat with some views that align with Catholic social teaching.
Bishop Barron engaged him in conversation representing Catholic social teaching.
Cardinal George passed away in 2015.
His words continue to resonate, especially regarding the divide between conservative and liberal Catholics.
In 2004, he gave a homily (later an article) addressing this divide.
He was an Oblate of Mary Immaculate (OMI) and a Chicago native.
He was drawn to academic work and loved books.
He earned a doctorate at Tulane University and taught at OMI institutions.
He served as a high-ranking official (Vicar) in the OMI order, traveling the world.
He got a second doctorate in Rome.
During John Paul II's papacy, he became Bishop of Yakima, Washington, and then Archbishop of Portland, Oregon.
In 1997, he became Archbishop of Chicago.
He inspired Bishop Barron to evangelize the culture, making him the "grandfather of Word on Fire."
Bishop Barron often refers back to Cardinal George's insights.
Cardinal George described liberal Catholicism as an exhausted project, a critique that has become parasitical.
Pre-conciliar liberalism was a necessary criticism of certain elements within the Church.
Figures like Thomas Merton, Dorothy Day, Henri de Lubac, Joseph Ratzinger, and Karl Rahner were seen as liberals before the Second Vatican Council.
Vatican II addressed the excesses and problems of the pre-conciliar Church.
Post-Vatican II liberalism became counterproductive and self-destructive.
It was unable to carry forward the great project of Catholicism.
Liberal Catholicism no longer passes on the faith in its integrity.
It doesn't foster the joyful self-surrender called for in Christian marriage, consecrated life, and ordained priesthood.
It no longer gives us life.
Liberal Catholicism does not articulate the substance of the faith well.
It is often hypercritical and focused on limitations and negativity.
People are not inspired to give their lives to a critical, negative position.
Catholic liberalism never gives rise to great vocations.
Cardinal George also criticized a type of conservative Catholicism.
This conservatism is obsessed with particular practices and is sectarian in its outlook.
It cannot serve as a sign of unity of all peoples in Christ.
It makes the same error as liberals in an excessive preoccupation with the Church's visible government.
Cardinal Lustiger of Paris: "A plague on the liberal house" and "a plague on the conservative house that simply wants to identify the Church with the ancien régime."
The Church should not be hyper-identified with 18th-century ancien régime France or 1950s America.
Catholicism is meant to transcend all cultures and engage all cultures.
It should not be a fussy, inward-looking nostalgia for a lost cultural form.
The answer is simply Catholicism in all its fullness and depth.
It is a faith able to distinguish itself from any culture and yet able to engage and transform them all.
It is a faith joyful in all the gifts that Christ wants to give us and open to the whole world that he died to save.
The Catholic faith shapes a Church with a lot of room for differences and a pastoral approach for discussion and debate.
It is a Church which knows her Lord and knows her own identity.
The Church can distinguish between what fits into the tradition that unites her to Christ and what is a false start or a distorting thesis.
Simply Catholicism transcends any culture and therefore is able to engage every culture.
A conservatism that hyper-identifies with a particular cultural form becomes limited to that form.
The Church transcends all cultures and therefore engages all of them.
Flags will always start fighting with each other, but the Church transcends every culture and therefore engages every culture.
The civil war within the Church has been revived because we've forgotten this principle.
John Paul II: Is this a Pope for our times or against our times? The only adequate answer is both. That is simply Catholicism.
The Church must be both for the culture and against the culture.
There are seeds (seminares) everywhere in the culture, which is why we should look to movies, TV, and popular culture.
A self-regarding, stupid conservatism withdraws into its fortress and sees everything in the culture as bad.
The Church has to rail against the demonic and fallen aspects of the culture from age to age.
Examples: abortion, euthanasia, the culture of death, woke culture.
The warring factions in their self-regarding stupidity cannot take in both elements.
Cardinal George and others understood this equilibrium.
If Cardinal George were alive today, he would say, "A plague on both your houses."
He would urge a return to simply Catholicism.
Both sides are playing a self-destructive game and are more concerned about tribal identity than the Church.
The Church is a big institution able to take in a lot of different perspectives.
It is a both-and tradition, not a stupid either-or tradition.
Recover the evangelical aim of an intelligently and beautifully presented Catholicism.
Amelia, a 6-year-old, asks, "Did Jesus ever get sick?"
He is like us in all things but sin, but it is not a sin to be sick; on the other hand, is sickness to some degree a function of the fallenness of the world and therefore of sin?
Did He feel sorrow? Certainly, He weeps, and He enters into the anguish of people, and one could say that is a result of sin.
The 2024 Wonder Conference will focus on faith and science.
It aims to debunk the myth that faith and science are incompatible.
The theme is recovering the natural science in the human body.
It will take place August 2nd through 4th, 2024, at the Rochester Civic Center.
Speakers include Bishop Barron, Heather Heying, John Veri, Jonathan Pageau, Father Robert Spitzer, Abigail Favale, Ryan Anderson, and many more.
Details and registration: wordonfire.org/wonder.
The “either/or” approach:
This approach represents a restrictive way of thinking that forces a choice between two options, failing to recognize the validity or possibility of both.
In the context of Catholicism, it refers to the divide between liberal and conservative factions, each emphasizing certain aspects while rejecting others.
Cardinal George critiques this approach as a self-destructive game, where both sides prioritize tribal identity over the Church's broader mission.
The “both/and” approach:
This approach embraces inclusivity and balance, integrating different perspectives to achieve a more comprehensive understanding.
It acknowledges that seemingly opposing viewpoints can coexist and contribute to a richer, more nuanced faith.
Cardinal George advocates for this approach, urging a return to simply Catholicism, which accommodates diverse perspectives within the Church's tradition.
Embracing the "both/and" approach can lead to a more intelligently and beautifully presented Catholicism, fostering unity and transcending cultural limitations.