Wk 7 Queering sex work and co-production_2025_Slides

Queering Sex Work and Co-production

  • Dr. Mary Laing from the University of York discusses the intersection of sex work and LGBTQ+ identities.

Who Am I?

  • Dr. Mary Laing has over 20 years of experience in sex work research.

  • Strong interest in collaborating with sex workers and engaging in outreach.

  • Involved in various research areas:

    • Focus on men who sell sex to men.

    • Research on queer sex work and experiences of trans sex workers.

    • Examined sex work in Canada and the impact of technology and policy.

Today’s Session Structure

Part One

  1. Queering sex work

  2. Co-production

  3. TransActions

Break

Part Two

  1. Questions

  2. Exercise (if time allows)

Queering Sex Work

Historical Context

  • Traditional focus of sex work research has predominantly been on women selling sex to men.

  • This reflects gendered research, policy, and theory, often in limited spatial contexts.

  • Current observations highlight a need for broader perspectives beyond these limits.

Exploring Male Sex Work in Manchester

  • Focus on experiences of men selling sex in various locations: bars, clubs, streets, and saunas.

  • Conducted participant observations and interviews.

  • Analyzes practice, performance, and regulation in the context of sex work.

  • Critique of existing policies that often exclude men, representing them solely as clients or traffickers.

Queering Sex Work: Moving Beyond Heteronormativity

  • Reference to queer sex work initiatives and literature.

  • Key contributions from various researchers highlighting non-traditional narratives:

    • The Limits of Labelling (Max Morris).

    • Walking While Trans (Gwyn Easterbrook Smith).

    • Touching Encounters (Kevin Walby).

    • Transmasculine and Non-binary Experiences (Angela Jones).

Co-production

Research Dynamics

  • Much research conducted "on" sex workers lacks their input or control over representations of their lives.

  • This can reinforce notions that sex workers lack agency and understanding of their situations.

  • Research traditionally focused on pathological inquiries about entry into sex work.

  • Marginalization of sex workers' voices leads to misrepresentation of their realities.

What is Participatory Action Research (PAR)?

  • PAR is a collaborative approach for social transformation, focusing on inclusion, mutual respect, and equality.

  • It aims to conduct research "with" participants rather than "on" them.

  • Essential ethical principles include collective action, democratic participation, and personal integrity.

Principles of Participatory Action Research

  • Recognition of the diverse knowledge of sex workers.

  • Inclusion of various perspectives in the research process.

  • Respecting and valuing all voices.

  • A focus on material change and redistribution of power.

  • Knowledge production through collaborative efforts and action-oriented interventions.

PAR with Sex Workers

  • Growing adoption of PAR methodology in research involving sex workers, allowing for deeper engagement.

  • Focus on creating spaces for dialogue that respect social justice and cultural citizenship.

Needs of Trans Sex Worker Communities

  • Necessity to center the voices of trans individuals in sex work discourse.

  • Recognition of their lived experiences and expertise, promoting research led by diverse coalitions.

TransActions

Importance of TransActions

  • Discussion on national trends in trans health care and recognition of structural harms faced by trans individuals.

  • Emphasis on lived experiences of sex workers to inform care practices.

Learning from Trans Sex Workers

  • Aim to produce accessible knowledge to improve service provision.

  • Collaborated with 15 sex workers from 2017 to 2023 for valuable insights.

Participant Experiences

Positive Experiences

  • Generally reported positive interactions with third sector organizations, especially those with inclusive staffing.

  • Importance of respect and dignity highlighted as key factors for positive service experiences.

Negative Experiences

  • Common issues include transphobic remarks, receiving inappropriate support, and feelings of judgment.

  • Long waiting times for specialized services noted as a persistent concern.

  • Encountering a lack of understanding about intersectional identities from health professionals.

Ideal Service Design

Participant Suggestions

  • Suggestions for ideal services included:

    • Counseling, mental health support, housing assistance, and safe communal spaces.

    • Staff awareness of diverse identities and needs.

    • Anonymity and accessibility as essential service features.

Key Themes

  • Mixed experiences among participants depending on intersecting identities.

  • Highlighting the need for improved health care understanding relating to trans and sex worker identities.

  • Opportunities for knowledge sharing between diverse groups.

Further Discussion

Questions

  • Dr. Mary Laing invites further questions via email: Mary.laing@york.ac.uk.

Group Exercise (Time Permitting)

  • Small groups tasked with designing a project to better understand the needs of cam workers, highlighting participants, methods, and ethical considerations.