Diagnostic classification
Assignment to categories based on shared attributes or relations
Classification is central to all sciences
Idiographic strategy: what is unique about an individual’s personality, cultural background, or circumstances
Nomothetic strategy: often used when identifying a specific psychological disorder, to make a diagnosis
Terminology of classification systems
Taxonomy: classification in a scientific context
Nosology: taxonomy in psychological/medical phenomena
Nomenclature: labels in a nosological
Categorical and dimensional approaches
Classical (or pure) categorical approach: strict categories
Dimensional approach: classification along dimensions
Prototypical approach: combines classical and dimensional views
Widely used classification systems
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Updated every 10-20 years
ICD-10
International Classification of Diseases
Published by the World Health Organization
Prior to 1980, diagnoses were made based on biological or psychoanalytic theory
Introduction of DSM-III in 1980 revolutionized classification
Classification now relied on specific lists of symptoms, improving reliability and validity
Diagnoses classified along five “Axes” describing types of problems
DSM-IV introduced in 1994
Eliminated previous distinction between psychological vs organic mental disorders
Reflected appreciation that all disorders are influenced by both psychological and biological factors
DSM-IV-TR (“text revision” of DSM-IV) incorporated new research and slightly altered criteria accordingly
Basic characteristics
Removed axial system
Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for disorders
Disorders are categorized under broad headings
Empirically-grounded, prototypic approach to classification
Adding new diagnoses: new disorder labels are created when groups of individuals are identified whose symptoms are not adequately explained by existing labels
The problem of comorbidity
Comorbidity: 2 or more disorders for the same person
High comorbidity is extremely common
Emphasizes reliability, maybe at the expense of validity
Dimensional classification
DSM was intended to move toward a more dimensional approach, but critics say it doesn’t improve much from DSM-V
Labeling issues and stigmatization
Some labels have negative connotations and may make patients less likely to seek treatment