Early Childhood Education and Care as a Social Determinant of Health

INTRODUCTION

  • Long-Term Impact of Early Experiences:
    • Early childhood experiences significantly shape lifelong physical and mental health.
  • Pathways of Influence:
    • Affects health directly and indirectly through factors such as education, income, employment, and lifestyle choices in adulthood.
  • Multiple Developmental Influences:
    • Children's development is shaped by various factors beyond ECEC, including:
      • Family income
      • Nutrition
      • Environment
      • Parenting
      • Peer relationships
      • Housing
    • Direct Impact: Healthy physical environment, quality parenting, and proper nutrition.
    • Indirect Impact: Family income influences the overall family environment, affecting development.

WHAT IS EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AND CARE?

  • History of ECEC in Canada:
    • Universal national daycare was recommended by the Royal Commission on the Status of Women over 50 years ago to support women's equality.
  • Terminology Evolution:
    • 1970s: "Day care"
    • 1980s-1990s: "Child care"
    • Now: "Early learning and child care" or "Early childhood education and care (ECEC)"

EVOLUTION OF CANADIAN ECEC FROM POST–WORLD WAR II TO THE PRESENT

  • Fragmented Development:

    • Mid-20th century ECEC evolved as separate education and care systems with varied provincial implementation timelines.
  • Political Influences:

    • Federal system grants provinces control over social programs.
    • Liberal democracy with a weak welfare state shaped ECEC policies.
  • Market-Based Approach:

    • Reliance on unregulated care, parent fees with means-tested subsidies, and private, often for-profit providers.
  • Failed National Strategies:

    • Four federal attempts (1970s-2000s) to create a national child care strategy did not succeed.
  • OECD Findings:

    • Early 2000s research exposed Canada’s ECEC shortcomings compared to other countries.
  • "Foundations" Program:

    • Launched by Paul Martin's Liberal government; canceled in 2006 by Stephen Harper's Conservatives.
  • 2006-2015 Stagnation:

    • National ECEC progress stalled under Conservative leadership, with some provincial advances.

ECEC DEVELOPMENT UNDER LATER GOVERNMENTS

  • 2015 Liberal Government:
    • Improved ECEC conditions with the 2017 Multilateral Framework on Early Learning and Child Care.
  • 2021 Canada-wide Plan:
    • $27.2 billion over five years; $9.2 billion annually by 2025-2026.
    • Goals: 50% fee reduction by 2022; $10/day average fee by 2025-2026.
  • Implementation Progress:
    • Agreements reached with all provinces/territories by March 2022.
    • Substantial fee reductions achieved by December 2022.

USING COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS TO ASSESS CANADA’S PROGRESS

  • OECD Comparison:
    • Early 2000s data showed that most European nations had strong publicly funded ECEC; Canada lagged in policy and funding.
  • 2021 Progress:
    • Canada began coordinated ECEC efforts with Canada-Wide Early Learning and Child Care agreements, though implementation is still early.

EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AS A SOCIAL DETERMINANT OF HEALTH

  • Factors Influencing Child Development:
    • Genetics, prenatal conditions, physical environment, nutrition, family attributes, peers, community, schools, and socioeconomic context.
  • Benefits of ECEC:
    • Promotes child well-being and development while supporting parents.
  • Research Evidence:
    • High-quality ECEC enhances cognitive development and social competence, with benefits lasting into school years.
  • Health Outcomes (Prentice & Ferguson, 2015):
    • Quality ECEC contributes to lifelong health benefits for children, women, and families.
    • Outcomes are influenced by factors like participation and access.

IMPORTANCE OF QUALITY IN ECEC

  • Characteristics of High-Quality ECEC:
    • Educated staff, good working conditions, small group sizes, engaging play-based activities, and well-designed environments.
  • Long-Term Benefits:
    • Lower juvenile crime rates, higher adult earnings, and improved maternal income, especially for low-income families.
  • Universal vs. Targeted ECEC:
    • Universal services foster diversity, gain public support, and prioritize disadvantaged children with additional funding.

PARENTAL EMPLOYMENT & COMMUNITY BENEFITS

  • Parental Employment & Education:
    • ECEC boosts parental employment; mothers with young children have increased employment rates (76% for mothers with children aged 0-3 years in 2021).
  • Community Building:
    • ECEC promotes social solidarity, diversity, and cultural preservation, benefiting especially Indigenous communities.
  • Equity & Human Rights:
    • Access to ECEC is a key equity issue for children with disabilities and women, increasingly recognized as a fundamental human right.

CHALLENGES IN ECEC

  • Care and Education Divide:
    • Despite progress, child care and education remain separate, with distinct administrative systems for licensed care and kindergarten.
  • Access to Regulated Child Care:
    • Coverage improved from 7.5% (1992) to 26.7% (2021), but access gaps persist.
  • Increased Public Funding:
    • Federal investment since 2021 marks a shift from historically low ECEC spending, with significant funding committed through 2026.
  • Quality Concerns:
    • Many programs provide minimal or mediocre care, especially in for-profit facilities.
      ## ECEC WORKFORCE CHALLENGES
  • Evolving Workforce:
    • Low wages (median salary $38,800 in 2021) and limited training impact quality and availability.
  • Monitoring and Data Gaps:
    • No systematic procedures for assessing effectiveness or informing policy, causing variability.
  • Research and Evaluation Limitations:
    • Unstable framework, limited funding, and lack of a long-term agenda for ECEC evaluation.
  • Provincial Variations:
    • Differences in staff training, quality monitoring, and program expansion progress.

CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS

  1. Did you connect availability, affordability, and quality of ECEC programs to social determinants of health before this chapter?
  2. Did you find surprises in Canada being the lowest spender per capita on ECEC programs?
  3. What media stories about ECEC relate to this chapter's content?
  4. Why is Canada’s provision of ECEC programs poor compared to other countries?
  5. Should access to high-quality ECEC be a human right for children and women?