N-Way within and mixed ANOVA - Tagged
Aston University Birmingham 2+ way Within and mixed designs ANOVAs
Presenter: Ed Walford
Learning Outcomes
By the end of the week’s activities, you should be able to:
Understand mixed and within-subjects multiple ANOVAs.
Analyze mixed and within-subjects multiple ANOVAs in Jamovi.
Interpret mixed and within-subjects multiple ANOVA outputs in Jamovi.
Report results from mixed and within-subjects multiple ANOVAs.
Mixed and Within Subjects Multiple ANOVAs
Definition of Mixed ANOVA:
Involves at least one between-subjects IV/factor and at least one within-subjects IV/factor.
Definition of Within Subjects Multiple ANOVA:
Involves at least two within-subjects factors.
Similar functionality to between-subjects ANOVAs discussed previously.
Example: Mixed Two Way ANOVA
Research Scenario: A developmental psychologist studies the pretend play time of children during school breaks.
Investigates differences by gender (boys vs. girls) and across different times of the year (winter, spring, summer).
Data collected from two reception classes over one month.
Total hours spent in pretend play recorded for 20 boys and 20 girls.
Identifying IVs and DVs
Independent Variables (IVs):
Between Subjects IV: Gender (2 levels: male, female).
Within Subjects IV: Term (3 levels: winter, spring, summer).
Dependent Variable (DV):
Total hours spent in pretend play.
Terminology
IV: Also referred to as factors.
Conditions/Groups: Referred to as levels of an IV/factor.
Jamovi Data Entry
Set up:
One column for gender (1 = male, 2 = female).
Separate columns for mean hours of pretend play during winter, spring, and summer terms.
Measure Type:
Gender as nominal, hours of pretend play as continuous.
Within Subjects Conditions
Ensure all levels for within subjects conditions (winter, spring, summer) have been defined as continuous.
Conducting ANOVA in Jamovi
Access through: ANOVA > Repeated Measures ANOVA.
Fill in names of levels for within-subjects factors.
Drag the appropriate variables into the displayed boxes.
Input the dependent variable and assign a name to the within-subjects factor.
Ask for 2 (eta2) effect size.
Output Interpretation
Interaction between gender and season: Significant with large effect size (29% variance explained).
Main effect of gender: Significant with very large effect size (57% variance explained).
Main effect of season: Not significant (0.2% variance explained).
Post-Hoc Analysis
Important to conduct descriptives, post hoc tests, and 95% CI ranges for interpretation.
Post hoc tests are not needed for the non-significant main effect of season.
They can help interpret significant interactions.
Interaction Analysis
Significant gender differences in spring and summer, absent in winter.
No gender differences in winter (p = .42), indicating season impacts gender's influence on play.
Estimated Marginal Means Dialogue
Input IVs into appropriate slots in the dialogue box.
Request marginal means plots and tables.
Season Main Effect
No overall differences in hours of pretend play across all seasons.
Means overlap and are consistent with non-significant findings.
Gender Main Effect
Significant results indicate males engage in significantly more pretend play than females, supported by overlapping confidence intervals.
Interaction Analysis
Confirms gender differences do not exist in winter; differences appear in spring and summer.
Confidence intervals for spring and summer do not overlap, indicating significant differences.
Quick Quiz
Recap of learned concepts.
Finalizing Tables
Complete tables with standard deviation (SD) values, removing standard errors (SE).
Use Exploration > Descriptives to request standard deviations for interactions and report them in the tables.
Reporting ANOVA Results
Break down into separate analyses:
Report two main effects (gender, term) and their interaction.
Start with descriptives for each analysis and move to inferential statistics.
Term Main Effect Results
Not significant (F (2, 76) = 1.11), indicating little variation in means across terms.
Reporting Gender Main Effect
Detailed reporting on mean hours of pretend play for each gender, indicating substantial differences in playtime (F (1, 38) = 321.96, p< .001).
Reporting Interaction Results
Interaction is significant, and presented results clarify specific conditions leading to observed differences.
Multiple Within Subjects ANOVA
Scenario: A psychologist studies offensive language use by following 20 fans across six matches, analyzing the effect of match location and result.
Data Setup for ANOVA
Within subjects 3 (result: win, lose, draw) x 2 (venue: home, away) ANOVA.
Requires setup of six continuous variables in Jamovi.
Data Entry for ANOVA
Ensure all variable names are appropriate and defined as continuous.
Conducting Analysis in Jamovi
Follow similar steps to previous ANOVA, defining factors and level variables appropriately.
Results Interpretation
Significant findings for venue and result; provide effect sizes and clarity on interaction.
Assumption Checks
Ensure sphericity tests are checked; apply corrections as necessary based on outcomes.
Post-Hoc Testing
Required only for IVs with three levels or more; conduct for Result IV and interactions.
Final Reporting
Report mean differences and significant post hoc findings.
State clear observations with supporting effect sizes.
Conclusion
Understand and analyze mixed and within-subjects multiple ANOVAs using Jamovi.
Complete workshop tasks, quizzes, and reading assignments.
Reading and Additional Resources
Reference: Dancey & Reidy (2020) "Statistics Without Maths for Psychology" (pp. 331-378); focus on mixed and within-subjects ANOVA.