Comparative Politics: Major Theoretical Approaches
Comparative Politics: Major Theoretical Approaches
Structuralism (Institutions)
Focus: Investigates how historical conditions, institutions, and systemic forces influence political behavior.
Core Ideas:
Political and social outcomes are shaped by inherited structures like institutions and economic systems.
Historical constraints affect choices and behaviors of political entities.
Applications & Examples:
Educational Inequality: College major choices are influenced by parental income and access to resources.
Jim Crow Laws in the U.S.: Institutionalized segregation limited African American opportunities for generations.
Easter Island Collapse: Environmental degradation due to inherited resource constraints led to population decline.
Rationalism (Interests)
Focus: Explores how individuals act strategically to maximize their political and personal gains.
Core Ideas:
Politics can be likened to a marketplace where actors evaluate costs and benefits.
Individual choices may lead to collectively detrimental outcomes despite rational intentions.
Strategic models, like game theory, are useful for explaining political behaviors.
Applications & Examples:
Prisoner’s Dilemma: Highlights cooperation challenges as self-interest often leads to defection.
Easter Island Case: Immediate tree-cutting for benefit resulted in long-term environmental disaster – a rational but harmful decision.
Democratic Decision-Making: Politicians prioritize reelection over socially optimal policies due to individual incentives.
Culturalism (Identities)
Focus: Considers how cultural norms, traditions, and beliefs influence political choices and institutions.
Core Ideas:
Political behavior is rooted deeply in cultural traditions.
Social movements and changes in regime often hinge on cultural rather than purely rational forces.
Cultural narratives can persist across generations impacting political identities.
Applications & Examples:
Anti-Semitism in Germany: Linked historical prejudices to political persecution from the Black Death to the Nazi era.
Civic Culture in Italy: Cooperation and trust in Northern Italy led to robust democratic institutions, while lack of engagement slowed development in the South.
Revolutions (Soviet Union Collapse): The fall was driven by shifting norms toward individualism and skepticism of authority, not just structural factors.
Comparative Politics & Applications Across Theories
Comparing Theories:
Structuralism: Focuses on long-term constraints shaping behaviors.
Rationalism: Emphasizes cost-benefit calculations for immediate decisions.
Culturalism: Examines the influence of entrenched traditions on political choices.
Stag Hunt Game:
Represents tension between self-interest and collective action, relevant in International Political Economy (IPE).
Highlights the necessity of mutual trust for achieving collective benefits, akin to challenges in global trade negotiations.
International Political Economy (IPE)
Economic Liberalism (Adam Smith):
Advocates free markets as a pathway to prosperity.
Minimal government intervention in economic matters is preferred.
Example: Multinational Corporations (MNCs) fostering global trade.
Mercantilism (Jean-Baptiste Colbert):
Aims for national wealth to enhance state power.
Supports protectionism as a means of economic survival.
Example: 19th-century British Empire enforced import restrictions to bolster domestic industry.
Economic Nationalism:
Views trade as a zero-sum game; one nation’s gain is another’s loss.
Strong states secure economic competition using interventionist tactics.
Marxism (Economic Radicalism):
Class struggle is central to economic relations.
Wealthy elites are seen as exploiting labor within capitalist frameworks.
Example: Dependency Theory illustrates how underdeveloped nations remain impoverished due to wealthy nations’ control over trade rules.
Trade & Development
Comparative Advantage (Ricardo):
Suggests that nations should specialize in efficient production and trade with others.
Example: The UK focusing on financial services, while China specializes in manufacturing.
Structural vs. Rationalist Explanations of Poverty:
Structuralism: Claims that global wealth distributions inhibit the growth of poorer countries.
Rationalism: Argues that poor nations make choices under constraints that impact their development.
Democracy & Political Systems
Defining Democracy:
Schumpeter: Characterized by free elections.
Held: Democracy must ensure political equality and freedom.
Boix et al: Political leaders are chosen via free and fair elections that meet suffrage thresholds.
Measuring Democracy:
Polity IV Index: Evaluates constraints on executive power.
Vanhanen’s Index: Assesses competition and levels of suffrage.
Democratic Transitions:
Lipset (Modernization Theory): Claims industrialization and wealth foster democracy.
Barrington Moore: Argues that class struggles are pivotal for democratic success.
Rustow & O’Donnell: Attributes political transitions to elite alliances.