freedom, sin and conversion, and the dignity of the human person
“Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought.” -St. JP II
true freedom isn’t just being free from rules so that one can do whatever they want, whenever they want, wherever they want
why? because choosing sin leads to slavery to sin
you can’t NOT sin if enslaved to sin, and if you can’t stop doing something, you are not free
freedom is linked to choosing what is good—leads human person to happiness we were made for
the moral code is not a duty to be followed BUT a reflection of what is good for humans
moral rules guide us towards higher goods instead of lesser ones
true freedom in a moral context is NOT the ability to choose whatever you want, but being free to choose the Good
other examples: dating vs. marriage, career choices, etc.
freedom from rules and restrictions vs. freedom for love and virtue
freedom from rules and restrictions
so that we can: do whatever we happen to think is best, which for most people means serving ourselves through sin
freedom for love and virtue
so that we can: love/serve God and others instead of ourselves (which is what slavery to sin makes us do).
original sin and the source of the world’s problems
the great drama of every human life is a the gap between who one is versus who one is meant to be/become
in a condition of brokenness that harms relationships with God, others, self and creation
the primary source of sin is pride
rejection of God’s will (which always wants and knows what’s best for us) in favor of one’s own will
people do this out of distrust
deciding if an action is sinful
object: the thing with which the action is essentially concerned (action that you are doing, must be in line with Law of God, some are always bad)
intention: what you desire to accomplish (must want good outcome)
circumstance: things separate from the object that are involved (people, place, time, etc)
all three of these must be good or neutral for an action to be considered moral
defining sin
omission: neglecting to do something good that you should do
commission: doing an act that is bad
mortal sin: when someone has deadened themselves to goodness (grave matter/object, full consent of will and full knowledge that it is wrong)
venial sin: when someone has wounded but not broken their relationship with God/others completely
conversion
God’s mercy is always available to those who ask
this isn’t an invitation to take advantage of God’s forgiveness by dwelling in continuous sin (presumption)
can occur in large and small ways
conversion is not just leaving behind your sin; it is turning towards Christ, who loves you!
we’re not escapists
“Brethren let us long, for we are to be filled”
temptation to think that if we leave behind sin we’re going to be missing out on something, but if we have the Highest Good, what Goodness could we be missing?
Why don’t people seek God’s mercy more often?
the human person was made in the image of God and therefore has infinite dignity and worth
made in image and likeness of God = intellect and will
created in the image of the one God and equally endowed with rational souls, all men have the same nature and the same origin. redeemed by the sacrifice of Christ, all are called to participate in the same divine beatitude: all therefore enjoy an equal dignity
evaluating the human person
placing a finite value on the life of a human person completely disregards Catholic moral tenets
cannot treat the human person as something that can be valued based on what they produce, how efficient they are, etc.
goes against modern view of the person
the right to life supersedes all other rights
all controversial issues surrounding life come down to whether or not the right to life itself comes above any other right
to draw a line and say that some lives have value and some don’t leads to all life being at risk
slippery slope
stages especially vulnerable in the eyes of the Catholic church
unborn - abortion, embryonic stem cell research, human cloning, IVF
elderly - euthanasia, nursing home abuses, neglect
“Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought.” -St. JP II
true freedom isn’t just being free from rules so that one can do whatever they want, whenever they want, wherever they want
why? because choosing sin leads to slavery to sin
you can’t NOT sin if enslaved to sin, and if you can’t stop doing something, you are not free
freedom is linked to choosing what is good—leads human person to happiness we were made for
the moral code is not a duty to be followed BUT a reflection of what is good for humans
moral rules guide us towards higher goods instead of lesser ones
true freedom in a moral context is NOT the ability to choose whatever you want, but being free to choose the Good
other examples: dating vs. marriage, career choices, etc.
freedom from rules and restrictions vs. freedom for love and virtue
freedom from rules and restrictions
so that we can: do whatever we happen to think is best, which for most people means serving ourselves through sin
freedom for love and virtue
so that we can: love/serve God and others instead of ourselves (which is what slavery to sin makes us do).
original sin and the source of the world’s problems
the great drama of every human life is a the gap between who one is versus who one is meant to be/become
in a condition of brokenness that harms relationships with God, others, self and creation
the primary source of sin is pride
rejection of God’s will (which always wants and knows what’s best for us) in favor of one’s own will
people do this out of distrust
deciding if an action is sinful
object: the thing with which the action is essentially concerned (action that you are doing, must be in line with Law of God, some are always bad)
intention: what you desire to accomplish (must want good outcome)
circumstance: things separate from the object that are involved (people, place, time, etc)
all three of these must be good or neutral for an action to be considered moral
defining sin
omission: neglecting to do something good that you should do
commission: doing an act that is bad
mortal sin: when someone has deadened themselves to goodness (grave matter/object, full consent of will and full knowledge that it is wrong)
venial sin: when someone has wounded but not broken their relationship with God/others completely
conversion
God’s mercy is always available to those who ask
this isn’t an invitation to take advantage of God’s forgiveness by dwelling in continuous sin (presumption)
can occur in large and small ways
conversion is not just leaving behind your sin; it is turning towards Christ, who loves you!
we’re not escapists
“Brethren let us long, for we are to be filled”
temptation to think that if we leave behind sin we’re going to be missing out on something, but if we have the Highest Good, what Goodness could we be missing?
Why don’t people seek God’s mercy more often?
the human person was made in the image of God and therefore has infinite dignity and worth
made in image and likeness of God = intellect and will
created in the image of the one God and equally endowed with rational souls, all men have the same nature and the same origin. redeemed by the sacrifice of Christ, all are called to participate in the same divine beatitude: all therefore enjoy an equal dignity
evaluating the human person
placing a finite value on the life of a human person completely disregards Catholic moral tenets
cannot treat the human person as something that can be valued based on what they produce, how efficient they are, etc.
goes against modern view of the person
the right to life supersedes all other rights
all controversial issues surrounding life come down to whether or not the right to life itself comes above any other right
to draw a line and say that some lives have value and some don’t leads to all life being at risk
slippery slope
stages especially vulnerable in the eyes of the Catholic church
unborn - abortion, embryonic stem cell research, human cloning, IVF
elderly - euthanasia, nursing home abuses, neglect