Martin Buber I and Thou
Martin Buber: Overview
Born: 1878 in Vienna to a Jewish family.
Languages: Yiddish, Polish, Hebrew, German, French.
Education: Attended Polish-speaking school, influenced by Catholic practices.
Notable philosophers studied: Kant, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche.
Career Highlights:
Early involvement in the Zionist movement (later left).
Advocated for a binational state in Palestine (1929).
Worked at University of Frankfurt until resigning in 1933 due to Hitler's rise to power.
Relocated to Jerusalem in 1938, taught at the Hebrew University.
Supported Israel's War of Independence (1948) but criticized extreme nationalism.
Major Concepts in Buber's Philosophy
I and Thou (I–Thou) Relation
Definition: A relational attitude where the Other is seen as a unique subject rather than an object.
Categories of Relationships:
I–Thou: Deep connection to other humans and spiritual beings.
I–It: View the Other as an object or categorization.
Partial Forms:
Inanimate objects: E.g., perceiving a tree uniquely.
Non-human animals: E.g., a horse as an individual being.
Significance of the 'Look'
Impact of Direct Eye Contact:
Creates presence and a sense of mutual acknowledgment.
Questions existential concern: "Do I matter to you?"
Relation Precedes Essence
Buber vs. Sartre:
Sartre: "Existence precedes essence."
Buber: "Relation precedes essence"; existence is shaped by relationships.
Philosophical Claim:
Self-consciousness arises through acknowledging the Other in a shared relational space.
Buber's Critique of Heidegger
Solitude in Existential Philosophy:
Human beings face an alien universe, seeking connection.
Concept of Mitsein:
While Heidegger's idea of being-with others is significant, it falls short of fully recognizing the other's essence as relational.
Criticism of Self-Centeredness:
Authentic existence leads to isolation; care remains self-referential unless barriers are crossed for genuine connection.
Ethical and Social Implications
Segregation and Relationships
Buber's Perspective on Segregation:
Damages both the segregator and the segregated by fostering an I–It relationship.
Opposes the teachings of Judeo-Christian tradition by dehumanizing others.