Use various informative, persuasive, and argumentative writing techniques.
Purpose of a Claim:
A claim shows which side of the argument the writer or speaker is on (Answer: b).
Examples of Credible Sources:
Scientific magazines or published articles.
National Geographic, NASA, Time, Forbes, WWF (Answers: a and d).
Components of an Argumentative Essay:
Using textual evidence and stating a counterclaim on rebuttal (Answers: c and d).
Supporting a Claim:
Use a reason to support a claim (Answer: a).
Beginning of an Argument:
Every argument begins with a claim (Answer: a).
Purpose of Persuasion:
To influence someone to do or believe something (Answer: b).
Definition:
Argumentative writing aims to convince the reader about a stance on a debatable issue.
Difference from Persuasive Writing:
While both may share techniques, argumentative writing is often more formal and fact-based.
Focuses on logical argumentation rather than solely emotional appeal.
Controversial Issues:
At the heart of an argumentative essay.
Analogy:
A comparison between two things that highlights similarities in order to explain a principle or idea.
Examples:
Comparing the universe to a watch to argue for the existence of a creator.
Stating life might exist on Europa due to its atmosphere similar to Earth.
Skin cancer in mice can indicate smoking causes lung cancer in humans due to similar biological mechanisms.
Caution: Avoid false analogies, as they can mislead arguments (e.g., comparing using a computer without training to driving a car without a license).
Comparison and Contrast:
Presents similarities and/or differences to illustrate a point.
Useful for showing the benefits of one opinion over another.
Example: Comparing investment benefits in the countryside versus big cities.
Definition:
Clarifies meanings of terms or concepts related to the argument to build a clear foundation for discussion.
Examples of Definition Arguments:
Examining birth control options in health care discussions.
Defining organic foods to argue for their benefits.
Analysis:
Involves breaking down arguments to evaluate their validity and relationships between parts.
Ask critical questions based on presented evidence.
Often used to counter opposing claims effectively.
Example: Analysis of the use of the Internet in education to challenge opposing viewpoints.
Claim: Every citizen should have access to free universal health care.
Support: Access allows patients to focus on health rather than insurance (emphasizes patient care).
Opposing Claim: Universal health care may be impractical leading to higher costs, reduced doctor flexibility, and unfair subsidies.
Evidence: Government restrictions can hinder profitability and sustainability in care.
Main Topic: Proficiency in the English language among Filipinos.
Main Claim: Decline in proficiency due to bilingual education policies leading to potential loss of language advantage.
Techniques Used:
Contrast between past proficiency and current struggles.
Analysis of educational policies affecting language skills.
Conclusion: Reinforces the importance of maintaining language proficiency for global competitiveness.
Challenge for Government: Develop strategies to regain language advantage.
Utilize the techniques of argumentation: analogy, comparison and contrast, definition, analysis.
Remind students to continue expanding their knowledge through various resources and experiences.