Definition: Moral theory that evaluates actions based on their utility—promoting goodness defined as happiness and pleasure for all.
Epicurus (341 – 270 BCE):
Advocated for Hedonism, emphasizing simple pleasures and avoidance of pain.
Focused on reflective, calm pleasures, like conversation.
Jeremy Bentham (1748 – 1832):
Observed humans seek pleasure and are social beings; proposed Pleasure as the universal measure of moral rightness.
Introduced Act Utilitarianism: Assessment of actions based on their individual consequences for pleasure.
John Stuart Mill (1806 – 1873):
Agreed with Bentham but differentiated between types of pleasure, stating not all pleasures are equal.
Introduced Rule Utilitarianism: Advocated for judging actions based on general rules rather than individual acts.
Consequentialism:
Ethics based on outcomes rather than intentions.
Maximizes pleasure, minimizes pain for all.
Phrases like "ends justify the means" illustrate this viewpoint.
The Principle of Utility:
Aim to produce the most pleasure for the greatest number of people.
Pleasure Definition:
Includes satisfaction, pride, joy, happiness—various forms of 'pleasure' are considered valuable.
Intrinsic Value: Pleasure holds inherent worth; its value is independent.
Extrinsic Value: Other aspects (e.g., money) are valued only for their contribution to pleasure.
Intrinsic Goods:
Valued for their own sake; example: Pleasure as the highest good.
Extrinsic Goods:
Valued based on relationships with intrinsic goods; used as instruments to achieve ends.
Treats the interests of all affected individuals equally.
Grounded in objective assessments of pleasure produced, applicable universally.
Calculating Happiness:
Bentham's Five Considerations: Amount of pleasure, intensity, duration, fruitfulness, likelihood of pleasure.
Act Utilitarianism:
A specific action is right if it leads to greater pleasure over pain for the majority.
Rule Utilitarianism:
An action is right if it aligns with rules that promote overall happiness when consistently followed.
Bentham: Focused solely on the quantity of pleasure (equal consideration).
Mill: Acknowledged quality differences in pleasure; favored higher quality pleasures (e.g., poetry over simple games).
A moral dilemma presenting the choice to save five children at the expense of one; highlights utilitarian demands.
Utilitarian perspective: Save five, even with moral implications of causing one’s death.
Complications in calculating happiness and its variables are seen as drawbacks.
Concerns over family loyalty and personal relationships being overshadowed.
Rights/duties are secondary to overall happiness, presenting ethical conflicts.
Utilitarianism presents a structured ethical framework, promoting rational thought against dogmatism.
Nonetheless, it remains subject to critique and refinement.