Speaker: Katya DeGiovanni
Introduction
Assessment in Educational Contexts
Criticisms and Issues in Ability Testing
Legal Matters and Educational Selection Tests
Employment Testing and Bias
Ability tests are widely used in schools and institutions to measure students' knowledge and skills.
Knowledge tested should go beyond mere recall; it should include comprehension and practical application.
Skills should ideally be transferable across contexts.
General Findings: Scholastic attainment is low among various ethnic groups including European American, African American, and Hispanic students.
Historic Progress: Since the 1970s, African American and Hispanic students have made improvements in reading, math, and science; however, their performance is still behind European American peers.
Competency Testing: Passing functional literacy or minimum competency tests is mandatory for high school graduation. There are concerns about these tests being discriminatory.
Critiques of Minimum Competency Tests: Critics argue that an 8th-grade competency test may not be a robust measure for high school graduation and can lead to 'teaching to the test'.
Definition: Value-added testing evaluates life competencies.
Methodology: Student achievements are assessed before and after educational experiences; improvements indicate educational effectiveness.
Roles: Involvement of school psychologists, counselors, special education directors, and teachers in testing activities.
Types of Assessment: Includes formal and informal evaluations based on observations, classwork, homework, and tests (including standardized tests).
Concerns about Standardized Tests: Potential errors in administering, scoring, and interpretation, necessitating properly trained administrators.
Current Status: Teacher training in testing methodologies is often superficial.
Misunderstandings: Teachers may not grasp test measurements or implications of scores, leading to overreliance on single test scores without considering student context.
Standardized Tests: Examples include Praxis I in the US and the English Language Competency Test in Malta.
Legal Challenges: The Praxis Series is widely debated due to its implications for teacher certification standards.
Confidentiality Issues: Testing criticized for violating individual privacy and confidentiality.
Limitations and Biases: Ability tests have been deemed inadequate predictors, unfair to minorities, and misused.
Perpetuation of Inequality: Concerns that testing preserves status quo and rigid classifications based on static characteristics.
Ethical Treatment: Psychological assessments require conscientious handling of results, awareness of instrument limitations, and respect for examinee rights.
Professional Standards: High ethical standards among examiners are essential; governing bodies like APA and BPS set codes of ethics to regulate testing practices.
Time Consumption: Testing processes occupy a considerable portion of school time and measure limited variables of achievement.
Major Tests: SAT and ACT dominant. High school grades are often weighted more heavily than other performance indicators (interviews, recommendations, etc.).
Reliability of SAT: The SAT is recognized for its design reliability in predicting college performance.
Critiques of MCQs: Authors Black and Hoffman highlight that multiple-choice questions favor quick readers and may undermine deeper thinking.
Responses to Criticism: Calls for performance-based testing approaches, including authentic assessments and open-ended questions.
Preventive Measures: Secure testing involves strict administration protocols to prevent cheating.
Causes of Cheating: High pressures from various societal factors lead to potential cheating behaviors, including answer copying and test theft.
Indicators of Cheating: Similar answer patterns and excessive erasures on answer sheets may indicate dishonest practices.
Comparative Education: US students, particularly in science and math, lag behind peers in other countries.
PISA Studies: Malta's performance in PISA studies reflects educational shortcomings compared to EU counterparts.
Coaching Organizations: Prominent entities include College PowerPrep, Kaplan, The Princeton Review.
Disparities in Coaching: Coaching may variably enhance test scores, leading to unfair advantages for coached students.
Research Findings: Mixed results regarding coaching effectiveness highlight methodological issues in studies.