Datas
Q U A N T A T I V E
data that represents behaviour in terms of numbers or quantities
e.g. how many? how long?
in experiments, the dependent variable is quantative
in self report methods like questionnaires, closed questions often collect numerical data
in an observation, a tally of behavioral categories is quantative
pros: easier to analyse, using inferential statistics
cons: the data oversimplifies reality, not all information is recorded
Q U A L I T A T I V E
data that can’t be quantified or counted
however it can be categorised and the frequency of each category measured
often contains opinions and descriptions
pros: provides detailed information which can give valuable insights into human behaviour
cons: increased complexity makes it more difficult to analyse data and draw conclusions
P R I M A R Y
information that is observed or collected directly from first-hand experience
for psychological research, this involves the researcher gathering data for the study being undertaken
→involves designing the study, gaining ethical approval, piloting the study, recruiting + testing participants and analysing the data
pros: researcher has control over the data + data collection can be designed so it fits the aim of the study
cons: time consuming and expensive
S E C O N D A R Y
information that was collected for a purpose other than the current one
the researcher could look at data collected by themselves over a number of different studies or information collected by a number of different researchers
meta-analysis: uses secondary data; data is taken from a large number of studies which involve the same research questions and methodology, the results are then combined
pros: much simpler to access someone else’s data + cheaper + less time consuming
cons: it is difficult to find data that fits the exact purpose of the study