Reconstructive Memory: The Loftus world (psy 301- Memory Lecture)
Memory and Recall
Initial Word Lists
First list of words:
Bed, rest, awake, tired, dream, wake, snooze, blanket, doze, slumber, nap, drowsy.
Second list of words:
Candy, sour, sugar, dessert, salty, taste, flavor, bitter, cookies, cherry, chocolate, yummy.
Counting Backwards
First sequence: Start from 118, count backwards by threes:
115, 112, 109, 106.
Second sequence: Start from 118, count backwards by sevens:
111, 104, 97, 90.
Memory Recall Activity
Participants were asked to recall words from both lists.
Survey Deployment
Participants wrote down words they could remember from each list.
Observation of Results
First list recall:
Commonly remembered words: bed, rest, awake.
Interestingly, the word "sleep" was reported by 55% of participants despite not being included in the list.
Concept of Spreading Activation
Explanation of how related concepts activate memory:
Words like "bed" relate to concepts of sleep, furniture, comfort, etc.
The concept of sleep is activated by the presence of related words, leading to false memories (e.g., sleep).
The more a concept is activated, the stronger the false memory becomes, affecting recall.
Second List Observations
Sweet was recalled by 61% of the participants, despite it not being in the list at all.
Implications of False Memories
Discussion on the impact of memory errors:
Importance in contexts like eyewitness testimony where accuracy is crucial.
Variation in question phrasing can influence memory perception.
Survey of Car Incident Video
Participants responded to surveys about a video incident:
Variations in questioning:
"How fast were the cars going when they hit each other?" vs. "smashed into each other?"
Results indicated that people remembered seeing broken glass more frequently when using the word "smashed."
Retroactive Interference
Elizabeth Loftus's Research:
Concept defined: Memory can be altered by information encountered after an event.
Question phrasing example shows how it can alter perceived memories of an event.
Background Object Recall
Participants questioned about objects seen in the background of the incident video.
23% reported seeing a giraffe, which was not present in the video.
The instance demonstrates the creation of false memories through associative cues during recall sessions.
Conclusion
Key Insight: Memory is impressionable and fallible, not merely a recording.
Encouragement to reflect on how easily false memories can be created and their implications in significant real-life scenarios.