Chapter 9 – The Team Approach to Health Care: Comprehensive Study Notes
National EMS Education Standard Competencies
- Fundamental knowledge requirements
- Patient safety principles and application during emergency care
- Transferring patient care
- Team interaction, communication, and dynamics
Introduction
- Role of the EMT
- Critical member of the emergency health-care team
- Charged with minimizing exposure to injury, infection, illness, stress
- Vision statement
- EMS Agenda 2050 advocates systems that are inherently safe
- Culture of safety concepts
- “Just culture” → balances system accountability with individual accountability
- Encourages reporting of errors without fear of punishment to improve processes
An Era of Team Health Care
- Community Paramedicine (CP) & Mobile Integrated Health (MIH)
- Exemplify the continuum-of-care team concept (care begins at the patient’s side and continues through disposition)
- System variability
- Team structure and effectiveness differ between geographic regions and agencies
Types of Teams
- Regular teams
- Members (e.g., two EMT partners) consistently work together
- Advantage: seamless coordination due to familiarity
- Temporary teams
- Formed ad-hoc; members may not know one another
- Common in volunteer or rural systems
- Special teams (mission-focused)
- Fire, Rescue, Hazardous Materials, Tactical EMS, Special Event EMS, EMS Bike, In-hospital patient-care techs, MIH techs
Groups Versus Teams
- Group
- Individuals work independently toward patient benefit (e.g., triage, treatment, transport groups)
- Team
- Individuals have assigned roles, work interdependently under a designated leader
- Five essential elements of a functional group
- Common goal
- Group self-identity
- Sense of continuity (expectation of future cooperation)
- Shared values
- Role differentiation
Dependent, Independent, and Interdependent Groups
- Dependent group
- Members await direction; limited adaptability
- Independent group
- Members self-manage their tasks; focus on individual area goals
- Interdependent group (ideal team model)
- Members share responsibility, accountability, and a common goal
- Core requirements
- Shared goal & mission clarity
- Clearly defined roles/responsibilities
- Diverse yet competent skill sets
- Effective collaboration & communication
- Supportive, coordinated leadership
- Crew Resource Management (CRM) & Situational Awareness
- Promote open communication, flattened hierarchy when patient safety is at stake
- PACE mnemonic for graded assertiveness
- P – Probe (subtle inquiry)
- A – Alert (express concern)
- C – Challenge (assert need for action/change)
- E – Emergency (take decisive action)
Transfer of Patient Care
- Transfer moments are high-risk for errors
- Guidelines for a smooth/ safe hand-off
- Uninterrupted critical care
- Minimal interference environment
- Respectful interaction among providers
- Common priorities (patient outcome centered)
- Shared language / standardized format (e.g., SBAR, MIST)
BLS and ALS Providers Working Together
- Interdependence: ALS relies on continuous BLS support (airway, CPR, etc.)
- Skill scope varies by jurisdiction; what is “paramedic-only” in one area may be EMT-level elsewhere
Assisting With ALS Skills (4-Step Model)
- Patient preparation (positioning, explaining, oxygenation)
- Equipment preparation (gather, check, assemble)
- Performing the procedure (anticipate next steps, hand over devices, maintain sterility)
- Continuing care (monitor, secure devices, document)
Critical Thinking & Decision Making in EMS
- Sound decisions rely on
- Up-to-date medical knowledge
- Patient-provided information
- History & physical exam findings
- Decision-making stages
- Pre-arrival (dispatch information, gear readiness)
- Arrival (scene size-up, initial impression)
- During the call (ongoing assessment, treatment adjustments)
- After the call (debrief, documentation, QI)
- Decision traps
- Bias (personal beliefs skewing interpretation)
- Anchoring (fixating on initial impression)
- Overconfidence (underestimating complexity, ignoring input)
Troubleshooting Team Conflicts
- Primary rule: Patient comes first
- Strategies
- Do not engage in conflict on scene; maintain composure
- Separate person from issue; address behavior, not character
- “Choose your battles” – defer non-critical disagreements until after call
Review Concepts (Sample Q&A Integrated for Reinforcement)
- Regular team characteristic → consistent partner interaction
- Group essential element → shared values
- Interdependent group → shared responsibility/accountability
- Closed-loop communication → repeating message back to sender to confirm
- Team leader role → coordination, oversight, helps members work together; often policy-defined
- Respect during hand-off → every member honors each other’s role; lifesaving care handed off, minimal interference
- Managing fatigue-related partner conflict → comply temporarily if not endangering patient, discuss post-call, avoid confronting in front of patient
Ethical, Philosophical, and Practical Implications
- Just culture → ethical obligation to report errors for system improvement, balancing responsibility without punitive fear
- Interdependence vs. Hierarchy → philosophical shift from authoritarian command to collaborative leadership to enhance safety
- Continuous professional development → EMTs must keep skills/knowledge current to support sound decision making and team effectiveness
- Vision year: 2050 (EMS Agenda safety goals)
- Partner fatigue scenario: 48-hour shift (demonstrates human factors in team dynamics)
Key Take-Home Messages
- Team-based care enhances safety and patient outcomes when guided by clear communication, defined roles, and supportive leadership.
- CRM tools like PACE and closed-loop communication translate aviation safety successes to EMS.
- Conflict resolution and a just culture protect both provider well-being and patient welfare.
- Continuous BLS support is indispensable even in ALS-level interventions, underscoring seamless teamwork across certification levels.