KK

PSY 1001 Chapter 2: Research Methods Part 2 Notes

Theories in Psychology

  • Theories organize existing knowledge and predict future observations.
  • Theories supported by substantial evidence become accepted as fact.
  • Psychological theories often employ abstract concepts or "constructs" to simplify explanations (e.g., memory, anxiety, extraversion).
  • Operational definitions are used in research to measure constructs. For instance, "memory capacity" can be measured by the number of words recalled from a list.
  • Some theories are so obvious they are no longer explicitly recognized as theories.
  • Primacy and Recency Effect: People are more likely to recall items from the beginning and end of a list than from the middle.
  • Psychological theories are often based on probability rather than certain outcomes, differing from physical theories.
  • Degradation of Memories: The likelihood of recalling items from a list decreases as time passes.

Goals of Scientific Study of Behavior

  • Description
  • Prediction
  • Identifying causes of behavior
  • Explaining behavior

Ways to Achieve Goals

  • Observational Research: Objectively observe and record behavior.
  • Correlational Research: Measure two variables and determine if a relationship exists between them.
  • Experimental Research: Control or manipulate one variable (independent variable) to determine if it causes changes in another variable (dependent variable).

Descriptive (Observational) Research

  • Acknowledges that individuals are not identical and do not behave identically.
  • Psychologists aim to describe average or typical behaviors.
  • Survey Research: Involves asking people about their characteristics, beliefs, and behaviors in certain circumstances.

Samples vs. Populations

  • Descriptive research often focuses on making statements that describe everyone (the population), rather than specific individuals or groups.
  • Due to the impracticality of surveying everyone, a smaller group (sample) is chosen, with the assumption that the results for the sample apply to the entire population.
  • Population: The large group of interest.
  • Sample: The small group that is measured.

Generalizing to the Population

  • If the sample is similar to the population, on average, measurements from the sample can be generalized to the entire population.
  • Example: A survey question asks, "How would you rate the quality of your Intro Psych lectures (on a scale of 1-10)?" If the average rating is 9.5, the question is whether these results can be generalized to all students registered for the class.

Random Sample vs. Biased Sample

  • A sample is biased if it is not representative of the population.
  • Example: Surveying only people who choose to attend lectures may result in a biased sample because they may have more positive attitudes than those who do not attend.
  • Random Sampling: All members of the population have an equal chance of being selected for the sample.
  • Random sampling helps create an unbiased sample that is likely to be similar to the population.

Random Sampling

  • A random sample is likely, but not guaranteed, to be similar to the population.
  • Example: If a class is 50% first-year and 50% second-year students, a random sample of 20 students is likely to have a similar distribution, but could, by chance, be all first-year students.
  • Statistical analyses can be used to estimate how similar the sample probably is to the population.

Naturalistic Observation

  • Researchers observe people or animals in their normal environments without intervening.
  • Example: Observing preschoolers on the playground to see how aggressively they behave.
  • Researchers may conceal themselves or remain visible.

Naturalistic Observation Coding Scheme

  • Researchers use coding schemes to categorize and quantify observed behaviors by:
    • Operationally defining behaviors of interest.
    • Counting the number of times those behaviors were observed.
  • This produces descriptions of behavior in natural conditions.
  • Example coding scheme:
    • Aggressive behavior = behavior intended to harm another person or damage objects
    • behavior that is helpful/cooperative (non-aggressive)

Case Study

  • Detailed observation of a single individual, often used when individuals have rare or unusual conditions.
  • Provides a description of the condition and its development.
  • Limited usefulness due to the lack of comparative information.
  • Can help provide direction for future research.

Predicting Behavior

  • Correlational Research: Identifies relationships between variables.
  • Allows prediction of one variable's value based on the value of another.
  • Correlation: Measure two variables (measured variables), compute a correlation.
  • Produces a correlation coefficient indicating the strength and form of the relationship.

Correlation Coefficient

  • The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient r quantifies the degree of linear relationship between two variables.
  • -1 ≤ r ≤ 1
    • If r = 1, it is a perfect positive linear relationship.
    • If r = -1, it is a perfect negative linear relationship.
    • If r = 0, there is no relationship between the variables.

Relationships Between Variables

  • Strong Linear Relationship: r = 0.96

  • Weak Linear Relationship: r = 0.68

  • Positive Relationship (Direct Relationship): r = 0.96

  • Negative Relationship (Inverse Relationship): r = -0.96

  • No Relationship: r = 0

Linear vs. Non-Linear Relationships

  • Linear Relationship: r = 1
  • Non-Linear Relationship: r = 0

Interpreting Relationship Strength

  • The sign of r (+ or -) indicates a positive (direct) or negative (inverse) relationship.
  • r^2 (r-squared) indicates the strength of the relationship, with 0 ≤ r^2 ≤ 1.

Interpreting Relationship Strength Examples

  • r = 1.00, r^2 = 1.00
  • r = -1.00, r^2 = 1.00
  • r = 0.80, r^2 = 0.64
  • r = -0.80, r^2 = 0.64
  • r = 0.50, r^2 = 0.25
  • r = 0.30, r^2 = 0.09
  • r = 0.00, r^2 = 0.00

Effect of Outliers on Correlations

  • Outliers can significantly influence the correlation coefficient.
  • Example: Without an outlier, r = 0.00. With an outlier, r = 0.59.

Correlation is Not Causation

  • If two variables (A and B) are correlated:
    • Changes in A may cause changes in B.
    • Changes in B may cause changes in A.
    • Changes in some "third variable" (C) may cause changes in A and B.
    • A and B may be related by coincidence.

Examples of Correlation vs. Causation

  • A study found that people who watched less than an hour of television a day scored higher on a memory test than those who watched more television.
    • Does watching less TV cause your memory to improve? What other interpretations are possible?
  • The same study found that people who read more fiction scored higher on the memory test than those who read less.
    • Does reading more fiction cause your memory to improve? What other interpretations are possible?
  • The number of churches in a city is positively correlated with the number of cars in a city. (Cities with more churches have more cars.)
    • Do more churches cause more cars? Do more cars cause more churches? What other factor might cause a city to have more churches and more cars?

Spurious Correlation

  • When two variables are correlated, but just by coincidence.