Unenforceable Modifications: Changes made to an agreement that cannot be enforced.
Remedies for Defenses & Excuses
Rescission: Cancelling the contract.
Restitution: Compensation for benefits conferred.
Reformation: Modifying the contract to reflect true intentions.
Capacity to Contract (Defense)
General Assumption: All persons presumed to have legal capacity to contract unless specified.
Exceptions: Focus on certain contexts: minors, mental incapacity, intoxication.
Legal Rationale: Inability to give genuine assent leads contracts to be voidable rather than void.
Capacity to Contract - Key Considerations
Spotting Issues: Examine facts at contract formation to determine if capacity is lacking due to:
Minority: Individual under the age of majority (18).
Mental Incapacity: Cognitive impairments.
Intoxication: Significant impairment due to substances.
Minors and Incapacity
Rule: Minor contracts are voidable before reaching age of majority (18) or within a reasonable time thereafter.
Ratifying Minor Contracts: Minors can ratify contracts upon reaching majority by either express consent or conduct (e.g., retaining benefits).
Exceptions to the Rule
Necessities for life (food, clothing, shelter).
Misrepresentation of age.
Willful damage to property subject to the contract.
Statutory exceptions (e.g., student loans, certain employment agreements).
Case Law: Dodson v. Shrader
Issue: Treatment of considerations exchanged when a minor disaffirms a contract.
Traditional Rule vs. Modern Rule
Minor can recover paid consideration but must return any benefits still in their possession.
Mental Incapacity
Cognitive Test (Majority): Assess if the person understood the nature/consequences of the transaction.
Volitional Test (Minority): Evaluate if the person could act in a reasonable manner in the transaction, knowing their condition.
Exceptions for Mental Incapacity
Necessities have been provided under contract terms.
The contract was executed when the other party was unaware of the party’s mental state.
Case Study: Sparrow v. Demonico
Examines legal standards regarding mental capacity in contractual agreements.
Requires medical testimony for incapacity claims and discusses policy implications based on accessibility to proving incapacity.
Intoxication
Rule: Intoxicated persons unable to reasonably understand the nature and consequences of their actions can void the contract if the other party knew of their condition.
Exceptions: Contracts for necessities are not voidable, regardless of intoxication.
Legal view of intoxication recognizes both voluntary and compulsive factors, making it hard to establish intoxication as a defense.