There are two primary definitions of community
A group of people living occupying the same area (physical/spatial)
A sense of belonging derived from sharing common interests and attitudes (cultural)
Community: a population living within a bounded space and sharing specific cultural practices through which they express a common identity
Putnam’s (2001) argued that there is a general decline of community in contemporary American society
Decline in membership of civic organizations due to the individualising tendencies of modern society
In other words, Putnam argued that something about modern society has led to a breakdown in social ties
Bowling alone → Working out alone → risking alone?
Sporting Individuality?
Fact: Adult competitive team sports are on the decline while involement in individual sports is increasing
WHY?
Social Explanations:
Within wealthy societies, involvement in individual sports is a marker of social/status differentiation and individual improvement
Individual sports demand less social investment and are easier to “drop”
As society has become more time-pressured, individual activities are easier to coordinate more time-pressured, individual activities are easier to coordinate than team activities
Within appearance-based consumer culture, many individual activities are body-focused
As organized team sport has become more rationalized and commercialized (and thus disenchanting), people seek enchantment through individual sports
Regardless of why, many agree that the individualization of society has led to a decline in community
Individual digital technology has facilitated the “absent present” self: people may be physically present in a space, but not really “present” with their surrounding space and peers
This decline is also evident within sport
However, many argue that sport is one of the few remaining bastions of community left in Western society
The “language” of sport
Includes the way we “talk sports” to identify ourselves, establish connection, and locate ourselves within American culture
The infiltration of sporting metaphors into a wide range of non-sporting language
Beyond participation, the formation and maintenance of community is especially apparent through sporting spectatorship and digital forms of sports media
French sociologist Emile Durkheim used the term “collective representation” to describe the elements of life (religion, art, and sport), that are the commonly shared institutions or experiences through which individuals express and derive their:
Sense of collective identification and belonging
Sense of “we-ness”
According to Durkheim, collective representations can contribute to levels of social solidarity (community/group cohesion) within a society
Social solidarity is created through the assemblage of practices, symbols, and values which are considered to be common to the average member of a society
Sport acts as a metonym for communities
Metonym: Something that stands in place for, or comes to represent, something else
Teams and/or athletes come to represent entire communities, cities, and nations
“a special experience during which individuals are able to rise above those structures that materially and normatively regulate their daily lives and that unite people across the boundaries of structure, rank, and socioeconomic status”
A moment of (temporary) unity, cohesion, and solidarity
Representative sport is often the collective glue for the community, creating moments of “communitas” that binds people together in various ways
Sports Fandom as Communitas? → Uniting people across the boundaries of structure, rank, and socioeconomic status
Levels of Sporting Communities:
Organic/ Face-to-Face communities
Extended Metropolitan Communities
Imagined National Communities
Small-scale communities are those in which we are familiar with a large percentage of community members
We learn the histories, rules, and bonds of community belonging through face-to-face interactions and experiences within the community
Often in small-town communities, the high school sports teams are metonyms for the community
High school sports are often the glue which provides a sense of belonging and binds the community together
Small town (8,000) in south Texas
Predominantly farming/ranching community
Considerable local poverty
80% Mexican-American population
North Town H.S. 600 athletes/Triple-AAA level sports team in 5 level state system
“The games enlivened the community’s social life… community sports was the patriotic, neighborly thing to do”
Friday night games
Weekly pep rallies
Marching band
Cheerleader/Pep Squads
Homecoming bonfire and dance
Powder puff football game
Booster club
Involvement in each of these elements of the North Town high school football ritual represented a context for the performance and display of individual commitment to the community’s traditions/rituals/values
Thus, on the surface, football becomes a vehicle for affirming the collective solidarity and harmony of the community
HOWEVER, the example of North Town demonstrates that is important not to overly romanticize the organic community
As much as the high school football ritual contributes to the creation of collective identity and belonging (communitas), it also reproduces dominant class, ethnicity, and gender based power structures, relations, and hierarchies
According to Foley, “North Town” high school football: “socialize(s) people into community structures of inequality”
Social Cohesion…Or Social Division?
Gender divisions/hierarchies
Sexuality divisions/hierarchies
Ethnic/Racial divisions/hierarchies
Social class divisions/hierarchies
Do the benefits and the “feel-good” vibe of sporting communitas cause us to go to extreme and excessive lengths to preserve it?
Do communities stake so much of their identity in sport that they are willing to overlook its potential flaws, issues, and human costs?
Metropolitan/urban communities are “imagined communities” : members can only realistically be expected to know, or be familiar with, a very small percentage of the entire population
Through popular media and political rhetoric, people largely imagine the common bonds and affinities which produce the feeling of communities
We imagine (assume) that other members of the community practice and express learned communal norms
Elite sport teams are one of the most powerful sources of identity for cities and their populations
Teams/athletes represent cities and often times come to enbody and enhance aspects of communal identity
Hence, supporting/following a team becomes an expression of an imagined civic/community unity, identification, and belonging
Professional teams thus allow for the performance of community in various ways
Although sometimes communitas occurs “organically”, we must also consider the ways that communitas is manufactured and exploited, as well as the political, economic, and cultural motivations for doing so
“Sport, as a civic ritual, is embedded in political-economic relations”
Established sporting communitas → Reconfirmed imaginings and experiences of sporting communitas
Commercially manufactured sporting communitas → Politically manufactured sporting communitas
In addition to selling products and merchandise, there are political motivations for manufacturing communitas
Many politicians and political figures latch onto sport to align themselves with the populace, or to push their ideological agendas through the guise of sporting “unity”
Because sport is so integral to the identity of cities, politicians face pressure to cater to sports franchises
Gaining/retaining a beloved sports franchise is seen as a major political win, while losing a beloved sports franchise is seen as a career-ending political loss… regardless of the actual implications to the citizens of the city
Community consciousness: It provides the “social glue” generating shared values, beliefs, and experiences that “bind community members to one another”
Community self-esteem: it increases the “self-esteem” of citizens, through their perception of living in a “first-rate, major league city”
In manufacturing community, professional sport may indeed transcend difference, but in doing so may divert attention away from the real social inequalities and injustices that persist within urban life
Ignoring the Urban “Rot” Beneath the “Sporting” Glitter
Why do cities invest in sport franchises?
Similar to sporting spectacles and mega-events (such as the olympics), the importance of sport to the community often gets exploited, and allows sports franchises to “hold cities hostage” through the building of stadiums
The vibes of sports franchises/stadiums for cities are good, but the real economic and social benefits are questionable
Through tax-payer funded corporate subsidies and commercially-focused initiatives, neoliberal city governments look to invest in spectacular “tourist bubbles” designed to attract the discretionary leisure income of:
Out of Town Tourists $ + Suburban Tourists $
There is also a perceived need to continually “feed the downtown sporting monster” through public subsidies for redevelopments of existing stadia or building new ones
There is intense competition between post-industrial cities vying to be a major league city, and hopefully attract business investment, tourist dollars, and new residents
Within cities such as Baltimore, the city is:
“hard pressed to meet the mounting social needs of an increasingly impoverished population with a diminishing tax base”
“This fiscal squeeze promotes, in Baltimore as in other similar cities, an emphasis on flagship downtown developments such as football stadia, ballparks, race car events and convention centers. These benefit downtown business interests but fail to do much for the stubborn poverty in the inner city”
“If you want to inject money into the local economy, it would be better to drop it from a helicopter than invest it in a new ballpark”
“Leakage - money that doesn’t stick in the local economy imagine a stadium as a giant drain. Money flows from the community into the stadium, where it whirls around for a bit, then funnels down some murky pipes, exiting far, far away”
Benedict Anderson famously conceptualized the nation as an imagined community:
SPORT: “uniquely effective a medium for inculcating national feelings”
Specific sports are vehicles for expressing American national identity, and thereby helping constitute the very sense of communal belonging (communitas) of the nation
In other words, in different ways and to different intensities, they embody what it is to “be” American
We, more than any other nation, care about the “homegrown national trinity of American football, baseball, and basketball”
Hot Nationalism: The intensified, extreme, or overt forms of nationalism which often occur during times of real/perceived national threats
Banal Nationalism: The routine, everyday, and often unacknowledged expressions and performances of nationalism which punctuate all aspects of our lives
Cool Nationalism: The expressions of indifference and/or hostility toward the nation, and a reluctance to acknowledge it as a source of identity
In the aftermath of 9/11, American society has been described as being in a: perpetual state of war, terror, fear, and insecurity
Periods of hot nationalism can, over time, raise the levels of banal nationalism
in effect, these raised levels of nationalism become the new normal, and become routine and unacknowledged aspects of everyday life
Sporting Militarization as Banal Nationalism
Sport spectacles are thus important agents of nationalism/national pedagogy:
They are sites at which the population are told, and learn, how to properly “be American” , or at least perform it
More problematically, they also:
Stifle dissent
Exclude certain people/groups from definitions of American
Define “patriotism” as "blind/uncritical support for a country’s action
Serve to normalize and perpetuate (rather than working to end) constant global warfare