Ch 2 social beliefs and judgement
Chapter 2: Social Beliefs and Judgement
1. Perceiving Our Social World
System 1 vs. System 2 Thinking (Kahneman, 2011)
System 1 (Automatic Thinking)
Intuitive, fast, subconscious (e.g., gut feelings, quick reactions).
System 2 (Controlled Thinking)
Deliberate, slow, effortful (e.g., solving a math problem, recalling facts).
Priming
Subtle activation of certain associations in memory that influence behavior (e.g., seeing words related to aging makes people walk slower).
Embodied Cognition
Physical sensations influence judgment (e.g., holding a warm cup leads to perceiving others as warmer/kinder).
Belief Perseverance
Clinging to initial beliefs even when proven wrong (e.g., belief in conspiracy theories despite evidence).
Constructing Memories
Memories are reconstructed at retrieval, not stored like a video.
Misinformation Effect
Incorporating false details into memory after exposure to misleading information.
2. Judging Our Social World
Intuition & Automatic Thinking
Schemas
Mental templates that shape perception (e.g., stereotypes).
Emotional Reactions
Instant responses that occur before conscious thought (e.g., jumping at a loud sound).
Overconfidence Phenomenon
The tendency to overestimate the accuracy of our beliefs (e.g., students overestimating their test performance).
Negativity Bias
Negative information has a stronger influence than positive information (e.g., one critical comment outweighs many compliments).
Magical Thinking
Unrelated thoughts or actions perceived as logically connected (e.g., wearing lucky socks for exams).
Illusory Thinking
Illusory Correlation
Perceiving a relationship where none exists (e.g., believing lucky charms affect performance).
Illusion of Control
Overestimating control over events (e.g., gamblers thinking they can influence dice rolls).
Regression Toward the Mean
Extreme behavior or performance returning to average over time (e.g., an athlete’s outstanding performance declining).
Heuristics (Mental Shortcuts)
Representative Heuristic
Judging something based on how well it fits a stereotype (e.g., assuming a philosophy major is a feminist activist).
Availability Heuristic
Judging likelihood based on easily remembered examples (e.g., fearing plane crashes due to media exposure).
Counterfactual Thinking
Imagining alternative scenarios (e.g., "If only I had studied more, I would’ve passed.").
3. Explaining Our Social World
Attribution Theory
How individuals explain behaviors:
Dispositional Attribution
Behavior attributed to personality traits.
Situational Attribution
Behavior attributed to environmental factors.
Fundamental Attribution Error
Overestimating personality influence and underestimating situational factors (e.g., assuming a waiter is rude without considering they might be having a bad day).
Actor-Observer Bias
Attributing own actions to situational factors but others' actions to personality traits (e.g., blaming traffic for being late but considering another's lateness as laziness).
Kelly’s Attribution Model (1973)
Uses three factors to determine behavior cause:
Consistency
Does this person always behave this way?
Distinctiveness
Do they behave differently in other situations?
Consensus
Do others behave similarly in this situation?
Self-Awareness Effect
Increased awareness of our attitudes and behaviors when focused on ourselves.
Cultural Differences
Individualistic Cultures
More likely to make dispositional attributions (e.g., assuming laziness for failure).
Collectivistic Cultures
More likely to make situational attributions (e.g., attributing failure to bad luck or unfair conditions).
4. Expectations of Our Social World
Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
A belief that leads to its own fulfillment (e.g., if teachers expect certain students to excel, those students may perform better).
Summary of Key Takeaways
Our thinking is influenced by both automatic (System 1) and controlled (System 2) processes.
Memories are constructed and modified over time instead of being retrieved perfectly.
Cognitive biases (overconfidence, heuristics, illusions) affect our judgments.
Attribution errors lead to misinterpretations of behavior, favoring personality over context.
Expectations can shape reality, making beliefs self-fulfilling.