2-5
Significance and causation
1945-1991 Cold War
US and USSR superpowers after the defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945
Ideological conflict
Conventional and nuclear arms race
Proxy wars in Asia, Africa, Latin America
Communism versus Capitalism
Bolshevik Revolution 1917
USSR Communist and one-party state
USA Capitalist and democracy
Increasing Hostility
Mutual suspicion caused by Bolshevik Revolution 1917 and the start of WWII 1939
West intervened in the Russian Civil War against the Bolshiviks
USSR did not receive recognition or join the League of Nations until 1934
Fear of Soviet communism greater than fear of German facism
Non-Aggression Pact (Nazi-Soviety) allowed Hitler to concentrate on attacking the West
Idealism versus Self-Interest
Each thought their system was best
Foreign policies impacted by idealism or imperialism?
What was the significance of Stalinism?
Stalin took over after Lenin in the late 1920s
Collectivization of all farms leading to deaths of agricultural workers
Five year plans
1930s Great Terror - purges of political opponents as well as regular people who were executed or sent to gulags (slave labor camps)
Stalinism
Complete dominance of Stalin over party
Party dominated the state
Powerful state security machine
Eliminating opposition
Paranoia and violence
Stalin’s role in World War Two
Tried to delay attack from Hitler by Nazi-Soviet Pact 1939
June 1941 Germans could not hold of action on Eastern Front and they launched Operation Barbarossa against Soviet Union on 1941
Red Army wasn't ready to resist Nazis
Were able to prevent them from taking Moscow and then pushed them back to Berlin
Victory over Nazi Germany made him more secure and powerful
6-9
Why did the USA and the USSR emerge as superpowers after 1945?
19th century world structure was gone - old powers of Britain and France could not maintain peace on their own
The USA and USSR emerged from WWII more powerful than before the war due to…
Military reasons
USA was number one air force power in world
USSR was number one land force power in world
France and Britain were second rank powers
USSR lacked strong military neighbors - they were a regional power
Economic reasons
US’ economy strengthened by war - out produce others put together
US committed to more open trade (markets flourished)
US had economic strength to prevent instability in europe
USSR replaces germany in supporting small european countries that were formed post WWI
Political reasons
For west - WWII shows that democracy triumphed over fascism (US on right path)
For USSR - communism triumphed over facism and it gained respect in Europe
USSR’s losses and use of Red army to defeat Nazis gave Stalin claim to great influence in forming a post-war world
USSR has political strength to prevent instability in europe
In 1945 - US and USSR become key players in establishing the post-war settlement in Europe
During this process, the alliance collapsed, and in 1949 Cold War emerges (lasts 40 years)
Vocab
Liberalism - emphasis on freedom of the individual (minimal economic interference by the state and promotion of free trade)
Believe in civil liberties, universal suffrage, parliamentary constitutional government, independent judiciary, diplomacy
Facism - rooted in ideas opposite of liberalism
Believe in limited individual freedoms in the interest of the state, extreme nationalism, use of violence to to achieve ends, keeping power in hands of elite group/leader, aggressive foreign policy
Socialism - developed in the context of the industrial revolution
Believe in a more egalitarian social system, governments providing for the more needy members of society, international cooperation and solidarity
Conservatism - a belief in maintaining the existing or traditional order
Believe in respect for traditional institutions, limiting government intervention in people’s lives, gradual and/or limited changes in the established order
Maoism - form of communism adapted by Mao Zedong
Believed revolution could be achieved by the peasants, not necessarily by the proletariat, class conflict was not as important in revolution as using the human will to make and remake the revolution, revolution should be ongoing
10-19
Causation and change
1945 American and Soviet soldiers met at River Elbe which signified the final defeat of Germany
Due to successful collaboration of USA and Allies in Grand Alliance
1949 two separate “spheres of influence” in Europe
After Berlin Blockade, Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany) established, then a month later German Democratic Republic (East Germany) established
The breakdown of the Grand Alliance
1941 Nazis attacked Russia and US and UK sent aid to Soviets which marked the beginning of the Grand Alliance
Churchill still didn't like Stalin, mutual suspicion
Stalin still wanted more aid and help from the two countries
1943 after the first of three wartime conferences relations seemed to improve some
Proposed date for Normandy invasion
Step 1: the wartime conferences
Discussed the state of the war, the status of Germany/Poland/Eastern Europe/Japan, the UN
The Tehran Conference 1943
Nov 1943
State of the war
1943 Allies were winning following turning-point victories in 1942
Germany
What to do with Germany after it was defeated
Soviet and US/Britain had different ideas
Drew from failure of Treaty of Versailles
Unconditional surrender of Germany
Roosevelt supported Operation Overlord (Allied invasion of northern France)
Poland
Stalin concerned about security, wanted territory
Shape of Poland’s post-war borders
Puppet regime with USSR in control
Eastern Europe
Soviets wanted the territories
US and Britain agreed but it went against the 1941 Atlantic Charter
Japan
US and UK wanted USSR to enter war with Japan and have a second Soviet front in Asia, Stalin would not until they beat Germany
The United Nations
Americans especially wanted to replace League of Nations with new international organization
Collective security
Conclusions
New international organization
Needed weak postwar Germany
The Yalta Conference 1945
The state of the war
Germany almost defeated
Germany
Allies decided Germany would be disarmed, demilitarized, de-Nazi, divided
Temporary division with four zones of occupation between USA USSR UK France
Allied Control Council would be set up to govern Germany
Stalin wanted lots of reparations from Germany
Germany would pay $20billion, USSR would get 50%
Poland
Lots of uncertainty about where borders would be drawn
And what would be the political makeup of the postwar government
New borders decided at Yalta
Eastern Europe
Agreement at Yalta about the future of Eastern European governments
Stalin agreed for free elections for Eastern Europe
Major victory for US and UK
Japan
Stalin would now enter war with Japan
Wanted territory from Japan and US and UK agreed
United Nations
Soviets joined
Five permanent members of security council with veto power
Stalin wanted 16 separate seats for Soviet Republics, US and UK agreed on three - Russia, Ukraine, Belarus
Conclusions
Agreement on UN
Soviet agreement to join Pacific war against Japan
Big Three signed “Declaration on Liberated Europe” pledging support for democracies in Eastern Europe
What were the crucial developments that took place between the Yalta and Potsdam Conferences?
Roosevelt died April 1945 and was replaced by Truman who was tougher on USSR
Germany surrendered unconditionally May 1945
Churchill and Conservative party lost 1945 general election, succeeded by Labour party Clement Attlee
Soviet Red army occupied as far west as in Germany
Right after Potsdam Conference began, US successfully tested first atomic bomb
20-27
The Potsdam Conference 1945
The state of the war
Germany surrendered unconditionally, war in pacific raged on - US ready to attack Japanese mainland and atomic bomb tests were successful
Germany
Allies decided they would carry out deNazification of Germany in their own ways in their own respective zones of occupation
German economy limited to domestic industry and agriculture, soviets receive 25% of their reparation bill from western zones
Poland
Truman insisted polish government was reorganized - said there was not a free and democratic vote
Stalin offered to include more London Poles within the Lublin-led government
Eastern Europe
US unhappy about Percentages Agreement that was made bilaterally between Stalin and Churchill in October 1944 (spheres of influence were discussed in terms of percentages when deciding the future fate or countries in Eastern Europe)
Truman challenged Stalin’s influence over Romania and Bulgaria but Stalin was already in control so the West couldn't force him to make changes
Japan
Bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and Japan soon agreed to unconditional surrender
Truman didn’t tell Stalin about the bomb
United nations
Officially created in 1945 - 50 nationwide signed, USSR was only communist power in the Big Five (US, USSR, France, Britain, Nationalist China)
Conclusions
The agreement of the immediate, practical control of the defeated Germany and the establishment of the UN emerged
Key developments 1946-1947
Salami tactics (USSR secured Communist control in Eastern Europe like slicing off salami - piece by piece)
Stage 1: established a broad alliance of anti-fascists in Eastern Europe; Stage 2: each countries’ governments were sliced off, one after another; Stage 3: Communist ‘core’ was left, and local Communists were sometimes replaced with Moscow-trained people
1946 - Baggage Train (leaders trustworthy to Stalin) returned to their countries - ensured communism
Free elections held in Jan 1947, campaign of murder, censorship, and deportation prior to election
In Poland - many candidates disqualified, arrested, murdered; voters taken off electoral register - Soviets viewed it as a victory over Western expansionism
Soviet pressure on Iran
UK and USSR agree to withdraw troops, but Stalin left 30000 in the north, they encouraged a Communist uprising
US and UK demand he removes troops but he refuses, wants Iranian oil, Truman threatens war
UN convinces Stalin
Greece and Turkey
Anti-imperialist and anti-nationalist rebellions in Greece and Turkey, UK and US believe they were being directed by Soviets
Italy and France
Communist parties grew stronger, US suspicious that these new parties were receiving encouragement from Moscow
Step 2: Kennan’s Long Telegram, Feb 1946
George F Kennan (US diplomat in Moscow) sent telegram to US State Department abt Soviet foreign policy (they withdraw when faced with strang military resistance, not logic of force)
USSR had insecure view of world, Soviets wanted to advance Muscovite Stalinist ideology, Soviet regime was cruel and repressive, hostility to outside world sustained this system, USSR was fanatically hostile to the West
The same year, NV Novikov (Soviet ambassador to US) also sent a telegram, set out concerns about US actions he saw as imperialism and threatening
Step 3: Churchill’s ‘Iron Curtain’ speech, March 1946
Churchill’s speech in Fulton, Missouri with Truman sitting behind him
Said by 1946 Soviet Communism would be prevalent in Poland, Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria, this Eastern European control would be extended to East Germany in two years
Red army was in the countries liberated from Germany by the Russians
Soviet ration: Stalin saw the speech as racist and a call to war with the Soviet Union
Soviets withdrew from International Monetary Fund (IMF), increased anti-Western propaganda, initiated a new five-year economic plan of self-strengthening
29-36 - Stop at Step 8 - Addie
Step 4: The Truman Doctrine
Truman Doctrine - speech made my Turman on March 12 1947, US obligated to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by outside pressures
Radical change to US foreign policy - it was traditionally isolationist
Britain can’t help Greek government with communist guerrillas, its economy is too damaged
Truman issued doctrine in Feb 1947 - military advisors sent to greece
Soviets say this as US trying to expand its sphere of influence
Beginning of US policy of containing communism
Step 5: The Marshall Plan
Jan 1947 - George Marshall replaces Byrnes as US secretary of State, believes Western Europe economies need immediate help from USA
Economic extension of the Truman Doctrine
Strict criteria for countries that qualify for US aid - allowing US to investigate financial records of applicant countries, USSR wouldn’t tolerate this condition; US invited USSR to join the Marshall Plan
Aims to
Revive European economies to ensure stability
Safeguard the future of the US economy
Four-year aid program of $17 billion passed in March 1948, successful due to Czech Coup
Soviet Reaction: they rejected Marshall plan, viewing it as dollar imperialism (establishing political control through economic domination and dependence)
US now trying to unite the West militarily
Soviets come up with Molotov plan - a series of bilateral trade agreements aiming to tie the economies of Eastern Europe to USSR
Created COMECON in Jan 1949, linking Eastern bloc countries to Moscow, controlling economic development
Cominform - Communist Information Bureau set up in September 1947, instrument to increase Stalin’s control over Communist parties of other countries
Comprised of USSR, Yugoslavia, France, Poland, Bulgaria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania
West concerned this org would spread Communism
In the 1920s and 1930s, Stalin developed his idea of Europe being divided into ‘two camps’ - this idea became a foundation for USSR foreign policy post WWII
Feb 1946 - Stalin’s speech emphasizes the creation of two camps opposing each other
Andrei Zhdanov’s speech - Americans organized an anti-Soviet bloc of countries, second bloc was USSR and those who were sympathetic to USSR (this is the two camps doctrine)
Step 6: Red Army occupation of Eastern Europe, 1945-1947
USSR created satellite empire - countries retained legal identities but were tied into following Moscow through military power, salami tactics, state police and security/spy networks, and COMECON
Stalin posed a coup to oust non-Communst members of the government in Czechoslovakia
By the end of 1948, the satellite states were economically and militarily under the USSR’s control - US saw this occupation as a breach of the agreements made at Yalta and Potsdam
X article - written by Kennan for Time Magazine in 1947 - argued US policy towards the USSR should be long term containment of expansionism (US should view USSR as a political rival)
Influential to President Truman - US policy of containment is essential
Step 7: The Czechoslovakian Coup, February 1948
Soviets saw Czechoslovakia was moving West - expressed interest in receiving aid from the Marshall Plan, Czechoslovakia had abandoned the Munich Agreements of 1938
Feb 1948 - stalin put pressure on the Czech government and twelve non-Communist members were forced to resign, leader demanded the formation of a Communist-led government
Two weeks later, Czech Foreign Minister Jan Massaryk found dead suspiciously, Truman calls the events in Czechoslovakia ‘coup’
Financing for Marshall Plan had not been passed by Congress, Truman used coup to push the bill through
Bloody purges of allegedly disloyal Communists continued during 1948 in the Eastern bloc
36-41 - Start at Step 8 - Claudia
Step 8: The Berlin Crisis of 1948
Post-war Germany
Divided into 4 zones
By 1949, divided into two separate states
Why did the post-war powers fail to unify Germany? Several reasons
Germany’s key strategic position and the differing aims of the main powers
Central Europe
Soviets wanted reparations
The increasing lack of trust between East and West as the Cold War developed
Mutual suspicion
Didn't want Germany to go to Communism
The specific disputes between the post-war powers within Germany itself
Food shortages
Allocation of resources
Political conflict
The Berlin Blockade 1948
Problem for West: Berlin within Soviet zone
West in Berlin had to receive resources in complicated ways
Stalin blockaded Berlin, created a crisis
West supplied Berlin through the air
Eventually ended May 1949
Results of Berlin Blockade
First time since 1945 that war was a possibility
Affected development of Cold War
Agreement between two sides would be impossible
Failure of Berlin Blockade had three main consequences
Division of Germany
West set up Federal Republic of Germany
Soviets set up German Democratic Republic
Continuation of 4-power control in Berlin
Berlin was divided city
Formation of North Atlantic Treaty Organization NATO
USA, Canada, Brussels Pact Powers, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Italy, Portugal
West Germany was admitted in Paris Pacts
This made Soviets scared
Warsaw Pact - brought Eastern Europe together under military command
Lacked organization and was more so politically but heightened the divide of Europe
What conclusions can be drawn about Europe’s situation at the end of 1949?
Europe now divided along political, economic, military lines
Germany was 2 clear states and not going to be reunited
USA was not avoiding anymore, now involved economically (Marshall Plan) and militarily (NATO) in Europe
No peace treaty with Germany so borders were not formalized
Western countries united due to Soviet threat
What did this situation mean for international relations beyond Europe?
Conflicts were seen as Communist v Capitalist
US policy of containment to fight Communism in Europe was now resisting Communism everywhere - leads to fighting in Korean and Vietnam Wars
UN could not effectively resolve international conflicts due to USA and USSR opposing one another
Pgs 57-69
Addie: 57-62; Claudia: 63-69
US Foreign Policy, 1949-1950
US optimistic that Soviets contained in Europe thanks to NATO and Truman Doctrine
NATO power rested on atomic bomb, no money invested into conventional sources; USA demobilized WWII troops but USSR did not
USSR gets the bomb
USSR developed its own atomic weapons 1949 - us has no ‘ace’
China falls to the Communists
Mao and CCp achieve victory in Chinese Civil War
The Red scare
Late 1940s and early 1950s - anti-communist rhetoric in US intensified due to influence of Senator Joseph mcCathy of Wisconsin
Campaign against communists, says Truman was soft on USSR and CHina
NSC-68 - Total Commitment
1950 - national security Council produced NSC-68 - secret policy paper about the threat of communism
Argues massive military spending increase is essential to prevent Soviet expansion, encouraged economic and military aid for countries resisting communism
North Korean invasion of SOuth Korea
Kim Ill Sung determined to unify peninsula as a communist country, but needed soviet military and financial assistance
Stalin gave approval so Sung in 1950 to carry out invasion
June 25 1950 - North Korea invaded South korea with goal of reunifying Korean peninsula
Stalin cautions Il Sung that the Soviets would avoid direct confrontation with the US and will not send Soviet troops
Who started the war?
orthodox/western historians agree with US that Stalin initiated and led war
Revisionist historians argued Stalin had no role in invasion - North Korea was responding to attacks from the SOuth
Post-Revisionist - Ill SUng planned invasion and uSSR played weaker role than previously thought
Uses evidence like correspondence between USSR & Il Sung
UN and US actions
June 27, 1950 - North KOrea controlled much of peninsula, including Seoul
In the UN - US sponsored resolution that called for military action against North Korea - 15 countries send troops
UN forces arrive in South Korea at INcheon and push North Korean soldiers back to 38th parallel
Eventually, UN forces drive North Koreans to Vaal river, the border between China and North Korea
China’s entrance into conflict
Fearful for its own security, Map sends People’s Communist Volunteer Army to cross border and battle Un forces alongside North Korea
SUccessful counterattack - Un troops driven back to 38th parallel
The 38th Parallel - Stalemate
Stalemate develops on 38th parallel, both sides suffered significant casualties (1951-1953)
Ceasfire signed in 1953 - conflict ended
Impact of Korean War
North and south korea went back to pre-war borders - divided at 38th parallel (demilitarized zone)
Korean war was the first hot war - first major proxy war between US, USSR China
Impact on US
Korean war is first containment war - believed to be a success
Tripled defense spending budget (recommendations of nsc-68 implemented)
Us rearms west germany and strengthens NATO
South-East asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) formed as anti-communist bloc in asia
Impact on CHina
Mao declared china saved North Korea from UN forces (China’s reputation grew)
Mao and stalin’s relationship strained - stalin insisted China pay excessively for military supplies provided by USSR
Impact on USSR
Due to US decisions, USSR becomes entangled in a more intense standoff than in 1950
Red army troops increased from 2.8 million troops in 1950 to 5.8 million in 1955
Conflict spread to other parts of world - not just europe
Pgs 72-79
Case Study 1: Korea
Success fro policy of containment (kept to 38th parallel)
Loses for US troops and Korean civilians
NSC-68 comes into force, communism contained at a great cost
Case Study 2: Japan
US occupied Japan post 1945
MacArthur is Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers (SCAP)
Create weak and pacifist Japan, but this policy changed
Demilitarize the country, new constitution including a bill of rights (emperor's role reduced from demi-god)
New constitution emphasized rights of individual - cure militarist Japan through fully democratic society, laws passed to break up elite Japanese families
MacArther needs strong, anti-Communist ally in asia with the cold war (China now fully communist)
Japan is that ally = communist wiped out, capable to resist communist threats from other countries
Economy is main objective of SCAP = trade unions banned, restrictions on commies, duty and loyalty important, elite rich can continue, known as ‘reverse course’, red purge
No longer seeking weak pacifist Japan - allowed to establish ‘self-defence force’ 75000 deep in 1950
American-Japanese Security Treaty signed in 1951 - Japan is military protectorate of US (retains military bases)
Successful containment of Communism, Japan’s economy is strong, Japanese attitudes highly important
US wanted Japna to become a bulwark against Communism, Japan resisted
Case Study 4: In-depth study of US and containment in Vietnam
Striking failure of containment - North not contained after decade of military involvement and loss of so many american lives and and money; Asia could fall like dominoes - happened in 1975
How did the US become involved?
Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos is indochina and occupied by japanese - don't want to go back to French rule
Ho Chi Minh led Vietminh - against Japanese, French don’t want independence, US supports France
Dominos!!
1954 - Geneva Accords (peace agreement) = french withdraw, temp withdraw at 17th parallel, free elections, Laos and Cambodia independent
US didn’t sign Geneva, they est SEATO instead = laos should remain neutral
Ngo Dinh Diem, South Vietnam leader - Oct 1955 est Republic of Vietnam
Brutal dictatorship emerging - diem doesn’t hold elections (ho chi minh more popular)
Vietcong formed military units supported by North Vietnam
John F Kennedy expanded fight against Communism
Increased military advisers, started counter-insurgency operations (search and destroy missions, spraying defoliants like Agent Orange, supported Strategic Hamlets Program, introduced Green Berets
Did not reduce Vietcong’s success, Buddhists were banned in South Vietnam
Lyndon Baines Johnson is president after Kennedy assassinated in 1963, he continued war
Gulf of Tonkin incident - north vietnam patrol boats fired at Maddox (US ships under attack)
Gulf of Tonkin Resolution - president repels any armed attack
Bombing, forces, dropped bombs, napalm, rockets
Pgs 80-88
The Great Society and the ‘credibility gap’
Johnson wanted to implement a program called the “Great Society” to improve civil rights, poverty
Credibility gap: difference between what the Johnson administration told Congress versus reality
The Tet Offensive
1968, turning point of the war
1967 Johnson told US they were winning
Jan 30 1968 70,000 communists launched a surprise attack, called Tet
American public opinion turned against the war
First televised war
Did President Nixon achieve ‘peace with honour’?
Nixon elected Nov 1968
Wanted the war to end but not for the US to “lose”
Henry Kissinger as foreign policy advisor
Scaled down troops
The Paris peace talks
May 13 1972 - Jan 1973
No one would compromise, all wanted ‘peace with honor’
Peace settlement Jan 27 1973
Americans would withdraw from Vietnam and both North and South would respect 17th parallel
Last Americans withdrew 2 weeks after settlement
By the end of 1975 many Asian countries had fallen to communism
Was Vietnam a failure for the American policy of containment? Historians’ views
Obvious failure to contain communism in Indochina
Some historians say it was not a total failure
Conclusions on the US policy of containment in Asia
Up to 1949, successful in Europe
Asia less successful as communism in Asia was more diverse and linked to strong nationalist movements
US thought they were fighting Soviet imperialism but were actually fighting local nationalist movements so they were less successful
Between 1945 and 1950 the cold war was influenced by other factors:
Events in Asia
Nuclear arms race
Change in leadership in US and USSR, move to establish better relations between East and West (this chapter)
Eisenhower and Dulles in the United States: roll-back, brinkmanship, and the New Look
Republican Dwight D Eisenhower elected pres in 1952
Military background, was never soft on communism
Presidential campaign discussed “roll back”
Liberating East European countries held by Soviets
This never happened, not even an attempt
Actually implemented “New Look”
Prevent extension of Soviet Communism outside of where it already is
Hopefully without expansion the system would collapse
How to do this?
Alliance with Soviet Union (SEATO)
Military power to protect vulnerable areas (West Berlin)
Assist forces fighting communism (Diem’s gov in South Vietnam)
Use CIA for covert operations
Reliance on nuclear weapons
Brinkmanship: threats of mass retaliation as an instrument of containment, threaten nuclear war to get someone to back down
Was aware of danger, summits to negotiate happened in 1955 and 1959
Khrushchev and co-existence
1950s summits were due to Eisenhower but also new leadership attitudes in Soviet Union
New leader of Soviet foreign policy
“New Course” idea later renamed “peaceful coexistence”
Move away from inevitability of war
Capitalism and Communism should accept continuing existence rather than destroy
Thought capitalism would die out due to weakness, thus no need for nuclear war
What other factors encouraged a change in international relations?
Other leaders supported more communication between East and West because they didn't want a nuclear holocaust
Economic factors
Korean War ended by 1954 which removed major source of conflict
East-West relations in the 1950s: the reality
Example of improved relations: 1953 agreement about Austria
April 1955 Austrian State Treaty was USSR peace treaty with Austria, made it an independent and neutral country
Then Geneva Convention where nothing really happened
Was the Geneva Summit a failure?
No real progress on Germany or disarmament
Was a breakthrough because of cordial discussions
Why did East-West tension increase again after 1955?
Good feeling was gone because of Khrushchev’s de-Stalinization speech and problems in Hungary and Suez Crisis
Eisenhower Doctrine Jan 19957: US would help Middle East fight communism
The technology race
Oct 1957 Soviets launched first satellite
Americans panicked, Soviet superiority in missile technology
Khrushchev was overconfident about abilities
The missile gap
US Congress and media promoted “missile gap”
Confirmed by Gaither Report - top secret committee
Recommended increase in defense power and missile development
Increase in conventional forces able to fight
Building fallout shelters to protect from nuclear attack
However US planes confirmed there was no missile gap, USSR did not have more missiles than US
Eisenhower had to alleviate public anxiety
Supported creation of NASA
Federal aid to science ed in schools
How did events of 1958-1960 affect East-West relations?
1958 Eisenhower confident in US nuclear superiority and wanted to ban atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons
Stopped in Oct 1958 followed by Soviet Union
Hoped to lead to formal test-ban treaty
Khrushchev then heightened tensions by issuing ultimatum to West to leave Berlin in 6 months
Arranged summit meeting in Paris for May 1960
The U-2 incident
Meeting produced few concrete results
Did generate positive atmosphere
However then American plane was shot down, lied about it being a spy plane
Eisenhower wouldn't apologize
No test-ban treaty
Berlin 1958-1961
Differences between West and East Germany
Economic - West had larger population and industrial output, received Marshall Aid, known as economic miracle (standard of living increased); East had forced collectivism of farms and socialism, disastrous economy
Political - West democracy, East no free elections, 1950s Stalinist authoritarian state, workers revolted, riots of June 1953, first major rebellion in Soviet sphere of influence
No further efforts by either side to reunite, change seemed risky, large potential for conflict
Berlin Crisis - Khrushchev and the crisis of 1958
East German escaped to West Germany through Berlin and emigration was easy
Exodus by young and skilled East Germans and was encouraged by West, between 1945-1961 one sixth of population moved to West
West maintained propaganda and espionage base in Berlin
November 27 1958 - Khrushchev proposed peace treaty, demanded Berlin should be demilitarized, Western troops withdraw, Berlin changed to “free city”
If West didn’t agree in 6 months, he would turn over control of access route to West to East Germany
East (GDR) would interfere with traffic to FRG (west), forcing Western allies to negotiate - recognizing GDR as legitimate
Krushchev’s influences included Soviet fear of West Germany acquiring nukes, concern of East Germany’s economy, and pressure from Walter Ulbricht (GDR leader)
Dropped ultimatum when West was outraged, Allies must discuss Germany
February 1959 - Geneva conference, proposals, nothing agreed upon
September 1959 - Krushchev and Eisenhower met in US, no agreement
Ulbricht grows frustrated with Khrushchev, refugees escaping East Germany grew, JFK is new US president in 1960
Kennedy and flexible response
Flexible response approach to containment - more spending on conventional forces, enlarging nuclear arsenal, continuing with CIA covert work, aid to countries resisting communism, negotiate with USSR
Kenney broadened range of options for resisting communism - Communism is more geographically diverse and giving assistance to the developing world
Moving away from Eisenhower’s policy of massive retaliation
Khrushchev, Ulbricht, and crisis of 1960-1961
Kennedy met Khrushvhev at Vienna Summit of 1962, Krushchev wanted to exploit inexperience (Bay of Pigs just embarrassed him)
Kruschchev renews Berlin ultimatum, Kennedy stands strong, builds nuclear fallout shelters and increases military spending
Berlin Wall
Increased refugees - august 12 1961 40000 fled to West
Krushchev had no intention of nuclear war but bowed to Kennedy’s threat and Ulbricht’s pressure, closes East German border in Berlin
August 13 1961, barbed wire between East and West Berlin, followed by concrete wall
What did the building of the wall mean for…
Krushchev - a defeat, Communist propaganda failed and Soviets had to create barrier to keep people in the East, also meant he could regain control of situation and free himself from Ulbricht’s pressure
Ulbricht - no peace treaty but he could consolidate Communist control in GdR
Berlin citizens - horrifying, families and friends cut off with no hope of reunion
Cold war - removes Germany as key issue in Cold War negotiations, Americans complained about the wall (US tanks confronted Soviet tanks at Checkpoints Charlie at one point), US relieved no war over Berlin happened
Symbolism of the Wall
1961-1989 - wall was powerful symbol of division between East and West, Iron Curtain became a reality
After wall was built, Kennedy visited West Berlin and gave emotive speech
Hundreds killed in next three decades attempting to defect to the West, guards instructed to shoot to kill
Soviet Union collapsed in 1989, wall eagerly dismantled
Pages 126-134
China becomes a Communist nation.
Background
A lot of tension between Russia and China
During Russian Tsarist times there was much tension along the border and in the 19th century China lost territories to Russia
China was impressed and grateful when the new Bolshevik regime suggested that it would give up all claims to the former Tsarist empire outside Russia.
a year later, the Bolsheviks seized Outer Mongolia
Civil War in China
The CCP grew in China
their principal aims for China had similarities with another political group, the Guomindang (GMD)
Both wanted to Unify China
The ruling GMD, led by Jiang Jieshi (Chiang Kai-shek), came to see the CCP as its key internal political enemy and waged a campaign to wipe it out
until an uneasy truce between the GMD and the CCP was agreed on, in order for the Chinese to unify against Japanese invaders.
When Japan left the GMD and the CCP once again turned on each other
October 1949 that Mao Zedong, the leader of the Chinese Communist Party, emerged victorious
Stalin and Mao, 1945-1953
The key differences between the USSR and the Chinese Communists were ideological
Joseph Stalin felt that Mao’s interpretation of Marxism could not be genuine revolutionary Marxism
Stalin also:
feared Mao as a rival for the leadership of the Communist world
did not want the Cold War to spread to Asia
knew that Jiang’s GMD would recognize Soviet claims to the disputed border territory along frontiers in Manchuria and Xinjiang
underestimated the CCP and believed the GMD to be the stronger party. He urged the CCP to unite with the GMD, even in the late 1940s, when CCP victory was looking inevitable.
Mao became convinced that Stalin wanted a divided and weak China to leave the USSR dominant in Asia.
saw Stalin’s policies as rooted in self-interest
The Sino-Soviet Treaty of Alliance
Mao was invited to visit Moscow in 1950.
trip produced the Sino-Soviet Treaty of Alliance
and the Soviet press poured praise and admiration on Mao and the new PRC
The Treaty offered the PRC the promise of Soviet expertise and low-interest aid
the Chinese were o ended by the rather ‘unfriendly’ treatment they received
Mao thought the accommodation given to the Chinese was poor.
clear that the USSR wanted to exploit the treaty in its own favour –Soviet aid would be loans and the Chinese would have to repay with interest.
Soviet planners and engineers initially developed 200 Chinese construction projects in the 1950s.
Traditional buildings were demolished for Soviet Style buildings
Soviet scientific technology was prioritized over Western technology in China
PRC also accepted that Soviet military assistance was necessary,
The USSR, the PRC, and the Korean War, 1950–1953
When American forces came close to the Chinese border, Stalin encouraged the PRC to send troops into Korea.
Soviets gave material assistance to the one million Chinese troops engaged in battle
Mao bitterly complained when the Soviets demanded that China pay for all weapons and materials the USSR had supplied.
Sino-Soviet Relations after Stalin, 1953–1956
There had been tensions and suspicions in the relationship between Mao and Stalin.
Speculation if Stalin deliberately delayed the end of the Korean War in order to exhaust the PRC
After Stalin's death things became betters
Signed a treaty with Korea
There was a relaxation with the tensions
new Soviet leaders appeared willing to supply further loans and technology to China
Made treaties more equal for the PCR as well.
Mao, Khrushchev, and ‘the split’, 1956–1964
three key issues undermined the potential for easing tension between the PRC and the USSR:
The ‘Secret Speech’ by Khrushchev in Moscow on 24 February 1956 attacking Stalin’s crimes against the party, including comments about the ‘cult of personality’, which Mao saw as an attack on his own style of leadership.
The crushing of the Hungarian Uprising in October/November 1956. Mao saw this, and Soviet problems in East Germany and Poland, as failures by the USSR to contain reactionary forces.
Khrushchev’s doctrine of ‘peaceful co-existence’ with the West, which implied that global revolution could be achieved by means other than armed struggle. Mao saw this as ideological heresy.
Mao and the PRC considered these issues a clear departure from Marxist doctrine
evidence that the Soviet Union was now dominated by ‘revisionists’
Conference of Communist Parties, 1957
Mao attended this conference of the world’s Communist parties
Mao called on the USSR to abandon ‘revisionism’
declared that international revolution could not be supported by working alongside ‘class enemies’ (the west)
Mao believed that the USSR was initiating détente with the West
Deng Xiaoping- Chiefs chineses spokesperson at the meeting
Was there to prove exceptional in putting forward the PRC’s ideological stance
Embarrassed the Soviet Union
proletarian world revolution could only come to be through force and destruction of capitalism
a sound international platform on which to present the PRC as the ‘real’ leaders of international revolutionary Communism
Khrushchev’s visit to Beijing, 1958
Khrushchev visited beijing to ease tensions with China and the USSR
Things didn't go well
Mao apparently went out of his way to make Khrushchev feel uncomfortable.
No air conditioning for him, mosquitos everywhere, made him swim (He hated swimming)
Deng used the occasion as an opportunity to attack Soviet policy, stating that:
the Soviets had betrayed the international Communist movement
the Soviets were guilty of viewing themselves as the only true Marxist–Leninists
The Soviets had sent spies posing as technical advisers into China.
Taiwan, 1958
the key issue of the PRC’s Nationalist enemies in Taiwan was not resolved
The GMD and their leader Jiang Jieshi could not be tolerated as an ‘independent’ state off the mainland by the PRC.
Wanted reunification with Taiwan
The PRC had bombarded islands of Taiwan in the early 1950s,
Deterred from further action by US’s Seventh Fleet patrols
1958, Mao decided to test the United States’ resolve
ordered a build-up of troop manoeuvres in the region
The United States responded by preparing for war with the PRC.
Mao did not launch an attack.
Was not prepared to fight off the US with no support from the Soviet Union
Khrushchev accused Mao’s regime of being ‘Trotskyist’ in pursuing international revolution at any cost.
evidence of Mao’s lack of understanding of political reality
The Taiwan crisis was negative for Sino-Soviet relations.
The Soviets withdrew their economic advisers and cancelled commercial contracts with the PRC.
Sino-Soviet relations and the ‘Great Leap Forward’
What was the Great Leap Forward?
was initiated by Mao at a meeting in January 1958
Goal- rapidly develop China’s agricultural and industrial sectors simultaneously.
harness the energy of the vast population of China, and by so doing dispose of the need for Soviet aid.
aimed to create the ‘proletarian class’ required by the Marxist model
anchored the GLF in the development of two key areas – grain and steel production
Mao promoted the construction of small backyard steel furnaces
Peasants and workers set about attempting to produce steel from scrap metal
Mao ignored concerns about the economic value of the poor-quality ‘pig iron’ that these furnaces produced.
Map continued this even though he knew it wasn't working
Mao’s reasoning was a desire not to crush the ‘revolutionary spirit’ of the peasants and workers.
Public works launched during the GLF were also generally unsuccessful
lack of experienced and expert leadership
As for the broader agricultural picture, some ‘revolutionary’ techniques were experimented with on the communes.
Pages 134-138
Failure and Starvation
Lushan Conference: Marshal Peng Dehuai spoke out against the disastrous impact of the GLF and because of this Mao had Peng removed and used his denunciation to launch a nationwide campaign against the ‘rightists’
From 1959, China experienced a widespread famine but Mao insisted that China continue to export grain out of hear of humiliation from the outside world
Clear evidence of draughts and floods from 1958 to 1962
The consequence of the Great Leap Forward was total economic disaster for China - an estimated minimum of 45 million premature deaths in China during famine years
Soviets denounce the GLF
In 1959, the soviets declared the rapid industrial change aspect of the GLF ‘faulty in design and erroneous in practice’
Mao was furious at this criticism and it was rumoured that Marchal Peng gave soviets information about the failures of the GLF
Infuriated at the denunciation, Mao was determined to get revenge. The PRC would now back any communist country that dissented from Moscow’s lead
Albania
In 1961, the USSR withdrew aid to Albania after Khrushchev made a speech that year attaching the Albanian regime for its ‘Stalinist’ doctrines
China interpreted this speech as an attack on their system as well
Soon after, the PRC offered to replace Soviet money and technical assistance given to Albania
The conflict over Albania led to the final severance of diplomatic relations between the Soviets and the Chinese Communists after more than ten years of tensions
The War with India
In 1962, fighting broke out on the Tibetan border between China and India. Years prior, the PRC had invaded Tibet trying to bring it under Chinese control
China did not recognize the boundary between the two countries and demanded that the border be renegotiated by China and India. India believed there was nothing to negotiate
Clashes increased along this border and the PRC began to prepare for war with India
War erupted on October 10, 1962 between the Chinese People’s Liberation Army and the Indian military. In the beginning, Soviets were ‘neutral’, but they ended up giving India MIG fighters
The war ended on November 20th, 1962 after China took the disputed areas and declared a ceasefire. Although PRC was technically victorious, this was limited due to the fact that America gained sensitive intelligence and possible access to bases in India
Cuban Missile Crisis 1961
Sino-soviet relations reached new depths of division during the Cuban Missile Crisis
Mao attacked:
The placement of detectable missiles
Their backing down
The negative impact it would have on the struggle against US imperialism
To Mao, the idea of existing peacefully with the non-Communist states went against everything their ideology dictated - it was interpreted that the USSR was betraying the revolution dn tolerating the exploitation of pre-revolutionary states by Capitalist powers
138-141 Claudia
Sino-Soviet Relations and the cultural revolution 1966-1976
Mao’s Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution launched May 1966
Eliminate culture, re-education
Little red book
Khrushchev left office 1964
No reconciliation between USSR and PRC
Soviets denounced Mao for creating state of anarchy
Soviets also attacked PRC for
Illegal trade with apartheid in South Africa
West Germany helped them on nuclear research
Worldwide opium trade
Helped US forces in Vietnam
Mao said other communist countries should follow Chinese model rather than soviet “revisionist” system
China, the USSR, and nuclear weapons
Dispute over military/nuclear weapons between two countries
1957 USSR beat USA to space
Mao - brinkmanship - undermine United States
Mao did not fear nuclear war, believed it unavoidable
Khrushchev wanted USSR superiority to promote coexistence
Two Communist countries disagreed on how to deal with Capitalist enemy
This intensified with Test-Ban Treaty 1963
USSR and West to stop testing, Mao thought USSR was abandoning communism to work with West
Khrushchev said Mao just wanted to see everyone destroy one another
China: If you are our friend, help us
USSR: Since you are our friend, you don't need our help since we’ll look after you
Soviets were inflexible, Mao said Soviets didn't see anyone else as an equal
Pgs. 141-145
China, the USSR, and nuclear weapons
Huge win for china that they made own nuclear weapons
PRC was taken serious internationally and no longer need soviet support
59/6 was name of bond year and month soviet scientists left china
Mao thins khrushchev deserves credit
Not scared of bombs like US and USSR useful tool of diplomacy
Key to spurping SOviet Union leader of international communist struggle
With Chinese space satellite in 1970 Soviet UNion feared development of ICBMS
The PRC and Leoni Brezhev 1968-1982
During the leadership period intended no improvement of Sino-Soviet relations despite a period of detente w/ U.S.
Invasion of Czechoslovakia, 1968
In Brezhnev Doctrine soviet union stated that to maintain order in Eastern Europe satellite states needed to accept Soviet leadership
When Czech attempted independence doctrine was put into practice
1968: soviet tanks were sent to crush liberalization period (prague spring)
Undermined the USSR’s standings with other Communist states this correspondingly damaged its attempts to isolate PRC
Mao condemned use of force against Czech bc soviet union no longer socialist and bc worried soviet military might turn against china
Sino-Soviet border war, 1969
Hostility between soviets and chinese communists →violent clashes along borders
PRC denounced Soviets as imperialists no different from tsars of old still had not returned territory taken from chinese in 19th century
1962: border disputes increased to new level along Xinjiang frontier and Amur and Ussuri rivers
Both sides increased numbers of troops facing one another across the border
1969: frontier dispute erupted into proper war
Soviets violated china's border 4189 times in period up to 1969
Tension became fighting on March 2nd 1969 on Chen-pao/Damansky Island in Ussuri River
Clearly possibility of war →danger of conflict turning nuclear
Mao feared soviet invasion and nuclear strikes so he ordered tunnels be dug in prep
There was no escalation to all out nuclear war but war had brought communist countries to brink
Some view 1969 as the lowest point in sino-soviet relations bc…
Serious border incidents threatened to turn into full scale war
PRC and soviet union realigned missiles to face one another
There was an intensification of the rivalry to be the leading communist nation
The PRC, the USSR, and Indochina
Indochina was focal part in split
PRC was involved in peace talks that brought an end to problems in indochina in 1954
U.S, had not wanted PRC there and U.S. secretary of state John Foster Dulles refused to acknowledge PRc representative, Shou Enlai
Vietnam War
When U.S refused to accept free election in vietnam drawn further in civil war through support for south
PRC was no directly involved gave support to Ho Chi Minh also attacked U.S. involvement ‘naked American imperialism’
Developed struggle between USSR and PRC to win Vietnamese Communists their side in ideological split
CHina accused USSR of being in league with the USA Vietnam, and PRC refused to allow USSR to use Chinese airports for Soviet airlifts to Vietnam
Nevertheless, USSR eventually won this contest by keeping up steady supply of aid and arms throughout the war
1978: relations were formalized in Soviet-Vietnamese Treaty of Peace and Friendship
Sino-Soviet clashes over Cambodia and Vietnam
Having lost influence over vietnam to soviets chinese attempted to form closer ties with cambodia
Cambodia has been communist in 1975 undt pol pot's khmer rouge party
Pol pot's regime was modelled on maoism but 1975-1979 brutality of regime was horrendous and exceed anything perpetrated in cultural revolution
2.5 million cambodians died but pol pot was hailed as maoist hero
In november 1978: vietnam signed military alliance with USSR
After clashes on border vietnam invaded cambodia on 24 december 1978
Aim: regime change to overthrow pol pot
Vietnamese began to expel all chinese people from territory they occupied
Pol pot appealed UN china decided to come to defence arguing vietnam invasion of cambodia was soviet expansionism
17 february 1979: china invaded vietnam
Intent to draw vietnamese forces out of cambodia
Soviets increased backing for vietnamese, both sides claimed the other as aggressor
Vietnamese/soviets also attempted to present their intervention to UN as being humanitarian grounds
No quick victory for chinese war dragged on into march
Vietnam had clearly won however chinese people liberation army claimed success
PLA suffered heavy casualties and had been forced to withdraw war had been major setback for PRC propaganda against the USSR as well as for PRC’S attempt to confirm its role as leader of Communist world
145-148
Sino-Soviet rapprochement, 1982-2000
Key reasons for tension between PRC and USSR
Mao Zedong’s death in 1976
the overthrow of the anti-Soviet Gang of Four in China
the adoption by the new PRC leader, Deng Xiaoping, of a more tolerant line in
relation to the Soviet Union and the West
Brezhnev’s death in 1982.
Soviet invasion of Afghanistan
Soviet troops on border with China
Soviet supports for Vietnamese occupation of Cambodia
Any attempts towards better relationship failed, mainly because of Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 (China viewed as imperial expansionism)
Mikhail Gorbachev and Deng Xiaoping
Michail Gorbachev - 1985 becomes soviet leader, Deng Xiaoping leads PRC - chance of improved relations
1986 - new trade agreement, full diplomatic relations restored
November 1987 Gorbachev asked to meet Deng, Chinese refused as Vietnamese hadn’t pulled out of Cambodia yet
May 1988 they signed a cultural exchange agreement
1989 Soviet withdrawal from afghanistan, relations improved
Tiananmen Square, 1989
PRC decided to brutally crush Chinese pro-democracy movement demonstrations in Tiananmen Square - shows fundamental differences in each country’s regime
Gorbachec initiated reforms in USSR - first time leader dismantled Stalin’s legacy
Perestroika - economic restructuring
Glasnost - more political freedom
Chinese economic reforms but no political
April 16 1989 students had peaceful protest for more political freedom - 100000 demonstrators
May 13 - Hunger strike (embarrassing for leaders, Gorbachev set to arrive in two days), protesters honored Gorbachev and his political reforms
May 19 - 1 million hunger strike supporters, May 20 martial law declared, Deng refused to compromise w students
June 4 1989 troops sent to disperse the ground, protesters threw rocks, troops opened fire (thousands likely died)
PRC official announcement is a lie
PRC’s brutal crushing of demonstration condemned around the world, no crippling sanctions applied to PRC by the international community
The Fall of the Soviet Union
Gorbachev’s reforms brought about his downfall, Deng thought hardline stance against pro-democracy protests
End of monopoly status of Communist Party of the Soviet Union in 1990, USSR dissolved in 1991
PRC no longer had communist competitor but didn’t seize international revolutionary initiative
Instead enhanced China’s position as major world player and continued its economic modernization
151-154 - maddy
Background
During World War II, the United States gave some material assistance in the fight against Japan, but most aid went to the GMD. After the Japanese surrender, the CCP and GMD fought in a civil war. Americans continued to give assistance to anti-communist forces but a victory did not happen.
When Mao Xedong and the CCP came to power in October 1949, the US refused to recognize the PRC as a legitimate state. Instead, they backed Chinese Nationalists who fled to Taiwan and Taiwan was given China’s seat at the UN
Taiwan became the key area of dispute between the US and PRC. However, Korea, Japan, and Tibet also began to cause tension and the US was concerned over the nuclear weapon development
The 1950s - Increasing tension
Tibet, 1950
In 1950, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army invaded Tibet. China saw this as a domestic concern and viewed it as part of their consolidation and reunification plan
There followed a reign of terror in the region and the US condemned the PRC for what the US perceived as expansionism and war - was deemed a cultural genocide
The Korean War, 1950-1953
At the end of WWII, Korea was divided along the 38th parallel with the North under a communist regime supported by the Soviets and the South as an anti-communist government backed by the US
In 1950, the North invaded the South, which was backed by Stalin and Mao. The PRC was not necessarily concerned with Korea as its major focus was on Taiwan and Tibet
Mao condemned US action but US justified by saying the North had been the aggressors
PRC organized demonstrations in China and warned the Americans that they would intervene if there was any push into the North
October 1950: UN troops crossed over to the North and as they got closer to the Chinese border, the PRC attacked. Over the next three years, millions of Chinese fought in Korea
Impact of Korean War in Sino-American relations
Korean war led to open conflict between US and PRC
Panmunjom Armistice: Post war, the US pledged themselves to the defense of Taiwan and Mao was now less in awe of the potential military power of the US
Hostility between US and PRC now became a key factor in international relations
Additionally, the PRC had been weakened by the conflict in Korea in terms of both the loss of life and economic loss. Politically, the war strengthened the CCP
Taiwan, 1954 and 1958
Korean war had altered the American perspective towards Asia and the Communist Chinese including the policy in Taiwan
Reasons PRC had attempted to take Taiwan
Taiwan was well defended and the PRC was not confident it had the air power or landing craft necessary
US Navy was now present
At the end of the Korean war, the US stated it would protect Taiwan from aggression
In 1954, Mao tested the US commitments to Taiwan by bombing Quemoy and Matsu. Eisenhower responded saying that they would go to lengths of nuclear weapons if Taiwan was directly threatened
It was necessary for the US to show strength to its other allies and they were confident that the Soviets would not support the PRC in a war
155-158 - addie
1958 - Mao began shelling Quemoy and Matsu, buildup of PLA troops
US Navy vessels fired on in Taiwan Strait - US prepared for war with PRC *no full-scale attack came in the end
US believed PRC was expansionist state - linked to domino effect theory - US pursued following policies
US trade embargo with PRC
Obstruction of PRC’s entry in UN
Economic and military aid to Taiwan
Aid program for the region
Instigation of regional containment bloc - SEATO
Bilateral defense treaties with Sian states seen as under threat from PRC
The Sino-American Cold war in the 1960s
McCarthyism has impact on US policies during eisenhower and Kennedy administrations (containment and isolation)
US highlighted failure of Great Leap Forward as failure of Marxism
Key issues of dispute in 1960s:
Taiwan
Vietnam
Decolonization movements
Chinese Cultural Revolution
The US, the PRC, and Taiwan
PRC persisted that Taiwan be reunified with mainland
Existence of a separate government and other China was an affront to CHinese nationalism
No return to the brink of the war that occurred in 1958 crisis, issue still fundamental to China
No compromise like two chinas is acceptable - improvement in Sino-American relations only possible without Taiwan as separate state
The US, Vietnam, and the PRC
Heightened tensions between US and PRC - PRC condemned US’ imperialism
Mao claimed UN dominated by imperialist policies
The PRC and decolonization
PRC’s decolonization movement not only ideological pursuit, also aimed to replace USSR as world leader and end AWestern imperialism
Bandung Conference - 1955 - Zhou Enlai asserted US was key danger to world peace, meeting set up in response to SEATO
29 nations asserted neutrality
1966 - Rusk outlined US’ policy to China
Doesn;t seek to overthrow the PRC
US objects to PRC involvement in affairs of other countries (promoting revolutionary forces)
PRC should not be underestimated
China didn’t have resources to make definitive difference in the developing world
Can’t deliver nuclear weapons to others
Rush’s threat of PRC is exaggerated
US and PRC’s Cultural Revolution
US saw Great Leap Forward failure as demonstration of Mao’s fanatical leadership - lacks stability and coherence
PRC seen as danger to the region and threat to the balanced dominoes
Chinese increased attacks on US during Cultural revolution, feared American attack, PRC leadership nervous
Sino-American Detente in 1970s
Four areas for focus for Sino-American relations in 70s
Taiwan, Vietnam, the UN, the Soviet Union
Detente began in 1969 - US eased trade restrictions, US’ parasols in Taiwan Strait halted
Major - US changed policy towards PRC’s membership in UN
Ping-Pong Diplomacy - American team competed in china, secret talks between Kissinger and Zhou ENLAI
Historic visit - 1972 - Nizon goes to Beijing to meet communist leadership
Joint communique issued - new relationship
159-162 - claudia
Why did the US want to detente with the PRC?
US thought containment was not possible based on Vietnam and wanted the PRC to help with exit strategy
US wanted to put pressure on Soviet attempts at detente
Nixon wanted to make history
Citizens supported more constructive strategies after the Vietnam war
PRC developed ICBM capability so the Americans thought it was more dangerous to not have contact
USA wanted to reduce commitment in Asia while retaining bases in Pacific
February 1972 Sino-American Statement Shanghai Communique
Why did China want to detente with the US?
60s and 70s USSR was the main rival of the PRC so PRC wanted to reduce tensions with USA
China could gain concessions on foreign policy issues (UN, Taiwan, US withdrawal from Vietnam and Indochina)
PRC wanted power of a potential resurgent Japan limited
PRC said detente would be temporary
Moderation of its stance against West could improve PRC standing in developing world
What did China gain from detente with the United States?
United Nations membership
Couldn't become a member because dominated by West
US thought PRC should not be member
CCP not legitimate gov, not democracy
Not peace loving nation
Taiwan had honorable record and shouldn't be expelled
More nations started to sway and they could be added
Result of UN membership for PRC
PRC now had veto power
Taiwan
CCP thought Taiwan belonged to China
US presidents had different opinions
163-166- abby
Japan
August 12,1978 China and Japan signed a friendship treaty
Within 5 years of their friendship treaty
China became 2nd only to u.s as trading partners
Benefit for PRC as it was a further pressure on theSoviet Union
Soviets were concerned at this new friendship between historic enemies, lead to more fears in USSR encircled
Vietnam
The Americans attempted to use the PRC to help them get out of Vietnam
better relations had been useful in adding weight to the American side in negotiations,more the leverage that the Sino-American détente gave them
Pressure had been achieved by new u.s policy toward china
Wider context
U.S.polivy toward China resulted in pressure on the USSR to maintain detente with the U.S. Americans were ultimately unwilling to play China card in relations with USSR
America's china policy had some impact on relieving its commitment to mainland Asia
Made up U.S. government loss of face changed policy as regards PRC’s seat at UN
PRC and the Cold War
China emerges as a significant factor in the development of the Cold War
The importance of Communist China’s role in the Cold War changed over time. The PRC’s influence grew in line with their nuclear power status, their increasingly hostile relationship with the USSR and, ultimately, their growing rapprochement with the USA
This shift in the balance of power resulted in the Cold War becoming a conflict that was more ‘tri-polar’ (USA, USSR, PRC) than ‘bi-polar’ (USA, USSR).
Tiananmen Square The PRC and the United States 1989
Following the death of Mao Zedong in 1976, the removal of the fiercely anti-American Gang of Four
relations between the PRC and the United States became more cooperative on one level
During the Reagan administration there was some degree of ‘cooling o ’ in terms of the diplomatic developments
In 1989, the Tiananmen Square pro-democracy protests in Beijing were violently crushed by the government in China
abuse of human rights led to protests on the streets in manyWestern countries, including the United States. Despite the public
Tiananmen Square made little difference to China’s international position, including its relations with the United States
condemnation, but no diplomatic isolation or economic sanctions.
The United States did not want to damage its trade links with the PRC.
U.S. PRC and end of Cold War
1900’s new Russian government withdrew its forces from Pacific
At the same time, the United States did not renew the lease on its naval base in the Philippines.
China was left as the leader of the Communist nations, but this was at a time when Communism was in crisis.
The former satellite states in Eastern Europe had all seen their Communist regimes collapse, some quietly and some with bloodshed.
Instead of seizing its opportunity to export its particular brand of Communism, new leadership in China focused on its development as a world power
establishing its economic power rather than concentrating on its ideological concerns.
In 1992 the United States gave the PRC ‘most favoured nation status’
Trade links have boomed and the US and China are now important economic partners
tension has again grown between the two countries.
168-175
Detente started 1968 to 1980 (Ronald Reagan as president)
US and USSR attempted to establish a more cooperative relationsing, improvements between US and China
Nuclear war dangers fueled detente, especially following Berlin and Cuba
Nuclear parity = equality in negotiation
USSR’s reasons for Detente
Stagnating economy - transfer resources from producing arms to good to improve standard of living for Soviets, import western technologies
Sought to keep China isolated from the West
US reasons for detente
Nixon and Kissenger initiated detente - find a way to end vietnam war and change international situation so US could have more realistic foreign policy (realpolitik)
Use detente to get USSR and China to put pressure on North Vietnam to end the war but keep US role on international stage
Reasons for PRC-USA rapprochement
China worried about international isolation, US wanted to carry out realpolitik approach
Both get leverage with soviets
Reasons for improved East-West relations in Europe
Political instability in europe - riots and strikes in france following Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia undermined president Charles de Gaulle
West Germany chancellor Willy Brandt wanted to improve relations between two Germanys
Whole continent would benefit - policy of Ostpolitik
Soviet side - formal treaty accepting borders post was never signed, USSR wanted to win Western acceptance of German division and formalize territorial situation in Eastern Europe
Successes of Detente
Srms agreements between US and USSR - SALT I
After the Cuban missile crisis agreements were signed, the most significant was SALT I which covered…
ABM Treaty - Anti Ballistic missiles allowed at only two sites, with with no more than 100 missiles (key for MAD and deterrence of nuclear war)
Interim Treaty - limited number of ICBMs and SLBMs
Basic Principles Agreement - rules for conduct of nuclear war and development of weapons - two sides must work together and promote peaceful coexistence
1973 - Agreement on the prevention of Nuclear War - if war looked imminent, both sides would make every effort to avert the risk
Began as process of institutionalized arms control, followed by spirit of cooperation (Nixon visited Moscow in 1972, 1974; Brezhnev visits washington in 1973)
Criticisms of SALT I - didn’t mention MIRVs making treaty meaningless
SALT II
Negotiations began in 1974, and the treaty was signed in 1979. Agreed to…
Limit number of strategic nuclear delivery vehicles on both sides
Ban on testing/developing new ICBMs
Most extensive and complicated arms agreement ever negotiated - US never ratified (gave advantages to Soviets)
Agreements between two Germanys and the Soviet Union
Early 1970s - treaties between USSR, East Germany, and West Germany
Moscow Treaty - recognize border between East and West germany, formally accepted post WWII Poland border
Final Quadripartite Protocol (1972) - victory for Brandt - agreed to status quo in Berlin (more security for West Berlin)
Basic Treaty (1972) - East and West Germany accepted existence of two Germanies
These treaties reduced tension in europe
Agreements between US and CHina
Agreements
US dropped objections to CHina taking seat on Security COuncil (PRC replaced Taiwan)
Trade and travel restrictions between two countries were lifted
Ping Pong diplomacy
Nixon visited China
Detentent spurred by deterioration of China-USSR relations - gave US more leverage and bargaining power in arms agreements with USSR (triangle diplomacy)
Still supported Taiwan
The ‘high point of detente’: the Helsinki Agreement
Moscow summit of 1972 - Nixon agreed to participate in European Security Conference held in Helsinki in 1973 attended by 22 countries and produces the FInal Act on Aug 1 1975
Basket 1 - security blacked following Ostpolitik negotiation with Soviet Union - recognized Europe's frontiers could not be altered by force\
Basket 2 - cooperation basket - called for closer ties and collaboration in economics, scientific and cultural fields
Basket 3 - human rights basket - all signatories agreed to respect human rights and individual freedoms like thought conscience, religion, freedom of travel
Basket 3 was the most controversial. West hoped to undermine Soviet control in satellite states, organizations set up to monitor Soviet action against principles set out in Helsinki Agreement
For Brezhev the important aspects were baskets 1 and 2 - prepared to sign agreement despite basket 3
176-181
Why did detente between the USA and USSR come under pressure?
Political factors that undermined detente
US thought arms agreements were benefits Soviets
Actions in Middle East and Africa showed Soviets were continuing to expand influence
Yom Kippur War October 1973, US thought USSR knew in advance about Egypt’s surprise attack on Israel
US and USSR had an agreement to disclose information like this, US was hurt
USSR involved in civil war in Angola and supported Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola, gave aid
Soviets and Cubans supported Ethiopia against Somalia 1977
Economic factors that undermined detente
Late 1960s, detente could help both sides
US economy recovered late 70s, less incentive to pursue detente
USSR economy declining
Jackson-Vanik Amendment restricted trade
Why did detente collapse?
Struggling by late 1970s, collapsed completely when Soviets invaded Afghanistan in 1979
US saw USSR “real intentions” to spread influence
No US athletes at 1980 Moscow Olympic Games
Carter Doctrine - US would intervene if Soviets threatened Western interests in Persian Gulf
Did detente fail? The historiography of detente
Positive view is that it reduced the threat and tension of nuclear war
Calling it a failure misunderstands its intentions
Was not trying to end arms race or reform USSR
Was meant to make what used to be dangerous more predictable
Could also be argued detente was weak and allowed Soviets to strengthen themselves and gain access to Western technology
The Second Cold War
Ronald Reagan elected on a wave of anti-Communist feeling and belief that US needed to reassert power
Reagan thought detente was a failure and only helped Soviets
Reagan was tough on Soviets
Increased defense spending
More nuclear weapons
Strategic Defense Initiative (Star Wars) research for space laser to strike missiles
Reagan doctrine, anti-Communist aid
Intermediate Range Missiles
Restricted trade and therefore Soviet access to US technology and resources
Aggressive language toward Soviets
Soviet Union leadership kept changing
Second Cold War era most dangerous moment was when Soviets shot down Korean airliner
Relationship was tense but would change soon with Mikhail Gorbachev as premier in 1985
200-204 Addie
Consequence an perspective
Nuclear weapons - dropping first Atomic bomb on Hiroshima - huge impact on Cold War
Started an arms race between major powers - maintaining hostility
Caused both sides to rethink military strategy and how Cold War conflicts were handled
Huge economic strains on both countries - played role in ending the war
A-Bomb: Nuclear bomb launched from missile or plane
H-Bomb: thermonuclear bomb - much more powerful than atomic
Strategic bombers: planes capable of carrying and delivering nuclear weapons
ICBM: intercontinental ballistic missiles, 3000 nautical mile range, care nuclear warheads
SLBM: Submarine-launched ballistic missiles. These missiles with nuclear warheads are carried on submarines
ABM: Anti-ballistic missiles, which can be used to intercept and destroy nuclear weapons.
MIRV: Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle. This device is launched by a missile that allows several warheads to be used, each guided to a different target.
How did the nuclear arms race develop during the Cold War?
US regarded atomic bomb as vital counter to the larger conventional forces of USSR
USSR well on its way to developing its own A-Bomb, first successfully tested in 1949
US achieved development of H-bomb in 1952, USSR in 1953
ICBMS developed in 1950s, US concerned that USSR was outpacing US in the missile race - “missile gap”
U-2 flights revealed no missile gap
US makes tons of ICBMs, putting pressure on USSR to respond
1968 - Soviets developed ABM defensive missile system and US developed MIRVs, intensifying race
1975 - USSR MIRV programme
Why was the arms race so intense during the Cold War?
Both sides viewed stockpiling nuclear weapons as necessary to safeguard interests
Continuing technological advances made each side feel vulnerable - stay one step ahead
What strategies were developed for using nuclear weapons?
Bernard Brodie’s The Absolute Weapon explained the invention of nuclear weapons was to win wars, now its purpose was to avert them - military victory in total war no longer possible
Both sides recognize the danger of nuclear weapons
Both sides believed there had to be a strategy that could be devised in which nuclear weapons could be used (why have them if not?)
Eisenhower and Massive Retaliation
US would fight with every weapon at its disposal if attacked, despite consequences
NATO meeting in April 1954 - treat nuclear weapons as conventional, threat of all-out nuclear war ensured no conflict would take place
George Kennan and others realized the concept of a limited nuclear war was problematic
McMamara and ‘counterforce’
Kennedy determined to widen options beyond massive retaliation - formed flexible response policy
Nuclear strategy more limited than massive retaliation
McNamara developed ‘counterforce strategy’ - objective of destroying enemy’s military forces, but no cities and civilian populations
Limitations: hitting target accurately, hitting target without affecting a city, ensuring Soviets also followed ‘no cities’ rule
USSR angered by policy - implied US would make pre-emptive strikes (not retaliatory)
Public opinion not favorable - makes nuclear war more, not less, likely
205-209 Claudia
The impact of the Cuban Missile Crisis: mutually assured destruction (MAD)
McNamara thought both sides should aim to target cities and cause max damage
If no one could survive a war, no war
Mutually assured destruction: MAD, accepted by all
Need to manage
Test-Ban Treaty 1963: no nuclear testing in atmosphere
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty 1968: cannot share info w non-nuclear countries
Strategic Arms Limitation Interim Agreement 1972: restricted numbers of land and sea ballistic missiles
The impact of Reagan and Gorbachev
Reagan built up US arms
Stealth bomber, neutron bomb, cruise missiles
Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI, Star Wars), space-based missile system to intercept and destroy missiles
Would have undermined MAD
Gorbachev new Soviet premier
Nuclear war was not possible so security must be gained by political means
Reasonable sufficiency: Soviets should have enough to defend themselves
The role of conventional weapons
Nuclear weapons were only a last resort so lots of conventional forces needed
The space race
USSR success in this area in the 1950s
Claimed everything developed better under Communism
April 1972 cooperative Apollo-Soyuz Test Project
211-213 Alyssa
Gorbachev resigned as president of the USSR on Christmas Day 1991, the Soviet Union ceased to exist.
The cold war was over, The collapse of the USSR ensured this
Ended in no bloodshed
The US and Britain were very surprised when the berlin wall was torn down in November in 1989
What was the impact of Mikhail Gorbachev?
Stalin’s ‘legacy’ meant that politically the Soviet Union remained an authoritarian, one-party state
Economically still focus on producing military goods
Gorbachev introduced two key reforming ideas:
Perestroika- restructuring the economy
Glasnost- the principle that every area of the regime should be open to public scrutiny
This was a big change in Soviet policy
Both involved greater ‘democratization’
Gorbachev intended to make the Soviet system more productive and responsive
Meant reducing military spending
not rise to the challenge of matching Reagan’s SDI system
Abandoned the arms race- negotiated a reduction of arms with the US
Chernobyl- heightened Gorbachev’s awareness of the dangers of nuclear power
Gorbachev was open to discuss ‘zero option’(eliminate all intermediate-range missiles in Europe) with Regan
The two leaders meeting together in four summits to discuss arms control:
Geneva Summit, November 1985: No substantial progress was made but the two leaders established a personal rapport and they agreed that ‘a nuclear war cannot be won and must not be fought’.
Reykjavik Summit, October 1986:- No agreement made, disagreement over SDI. Soviets want them to be ‘confined to the laboratory’, the US refuses any concessions. Also covered the most sweeping arms control proposals in history
Washington Summit, December 1987:- Agreement reached. An Intermediate-Range Nuclear Force Treaty (INF Treaty) was signed (agreed to abolish weapons: land-based missiles of intermediate and shorter range). First step to reducing nuclear stockpiles. Agreement was also reached for the first time on inspection of the destruction of missiles.
Moscow Summit, May 1988:- Again there was disagreement over SDI, but arms reductions negotiations continued. Standing in Red Square, Reagan confessed that he now no longer believed in the ‘evil empire’.
By 1988, Gorbachev had announced his plans to withdraw from Afghanistan,
He pulled back Soviet aid to its ‘allies’ in the developing world.
The ‘thawing’ of the Cold War continued under the new US president, George HW Bush.
At the Malta Summit between the US and Soviet leaders in 1989, Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze announced that the superpowers had ‘buried the Cold War at the bottom of the Mediterranean’.
214-215 Claudia
What was the role of Ronald Reagan?
Gorbachev was willing to tackle nuclear weapons and do business with the west, this can explain the breakdown of the Cold War
Also can be argued that Ronald Reagan’s approach to the USSR in early 1980s caused arms negotiations
Reagan’s character and willingness to engage with Gorbachev was important
Different summits, Reagan convinced Gorbachev of possibility of halting nuclear arms race
Long term factors in ending the Cold War
What was the role of the Soviet economy?
When Brezhnev died in 1982, political and economic USSR policies were in crisis
Brezhnev had Soviets spend lots on foreign policy
Arms treaties with US
But also “parity” or equal nuclear weapons
This was very costly
Brezhnev’s era was also stagnation and decline
No spending on consumer goods or the domestic economy
Falling behind on modern technology
Poor work conditions and low morale
Gorbachev inherited a failing economy
216-218 Addie
The impact of Gorbachev’s reforms
Collapse of soviet union (unintended impact)
Wanted to revive economy and modify system through perestroika and glasnost
Instead, encouraging private ownership led to chaos - no effective system to cope with market economy
Liberalization coincided with fal in world’s oil prices
Glasnost allowed for openness and discussion - criticism of Soviet systems (old system failed to compete with Capitalism, new reforms failed to solve country’s problems)
= hard to defend legitimacy of existing Soviet system
What was the role of ideological challenge and people power in ending the Cold War?
Late 1980s - resurgence in nationalist movements in most satellite states due to…
Continued deterioration of living standards (inefficient quantity and quality of goods produces, goods in short supply; East Germany and Czechoslovakia saw images of West German capitalism, looked superior)
Growing disillusion with Communist Party (shown itself as corrupt - leaders more interested in preserving own privileges; 1980s - regimes led by men with no interest in reform and were out of touch w people they ruled, but maintained positions through police)
Implications of Gorbachev’s reforms of glasnost and perestroika (willing to use force to maintain control over satellite states)
Dec 7 1988 - Gorbachev speech to UN - USSR would cut by half a million men its commitment of troops to Warsaw Pact
Obvious that force and threat should not be instrument of foreign policy, freedom of choice is universal principle
Eastern Europe now knows the Brezhnev doctrine wouldn’t be applied and countries could do it their way (Sinatra Doctrine)
1989 - series of revolutions in satellite states, whole Soviet system including Stalin’s legacy swept away
The Events of 1989
May 1989 - Hungarian Prime Minister Miklós Németh decided government couldn't afford to maintain border control along Austria - no longer necessary (Hungarians can travel freely)
= escape route fo rEast Germans - cross through Hungary to West Germany
Events in Poland
Union movement called Solidarity was suppressed in 1981 by General Jaruzelski who declared a state of martial law
Continued support for Solidarity due to economic stagnation and support from Catholic Church
In response to Gorbachev’s reforms, Solidarity legalized in 1988, won the first free elections in Poland in 1989
Jarulzelski remained president, Lech Walesa became prime minister
Communist party defeated by huge popular vote - first in Eastern Bloc since 1940s to not be controlled by Communists
Gorbachev had not intervened to support old Communist regime, Polish Communist Party collapsed
219-221 - Maddy
Events in East Germany
Erich Honecker: Hardline communist and was the leader of East Germany since 1971. Honecker was hated all around and by mid 80s there was a lot of government pressure to remove him
Hoped to consolidate communist control in East Germany but many criticized his repressive system demanding reforms
Wanted to use force to control the swell of anti-communist party feeling.
The Stasi: East Germany secret police regime that was extremely repressive. Kept files on 5.5 million people
Demonstrations began to grow and a new leader Egon Krenz was put in place
November 9 1989: Government announces the easing of travel and immigration restrictions and barriers were opened that night and within a few hours the wall was destroyed and was a symbol of the end of the Cold War
After free elections began in 1990, parties were in favour of reunification with West Germany and on October 3rd, 1990, the two were officially one again.
Events in Hungary
Reform came from within the Hungarian Communist party
Reformers got rid of their harsh leader and then dominated the government
First free elections were held in 1990
Events in Czechoslovakia
Velvet Revolution: a fairly non-violent movement that led to the downfall of the communist regime - government was forced to respond to mass demonstrations advocating for reform
Civic Forum: non-violent and anti-communist organization
Warsaw pact nations issued a statement condemning the 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia as illegal and promised never to interfere in others’ internal affairs
Events in Romania
Much more violent than in Czechoslovakia
Romania’s president, Nicholas Ceausescu and his regime were one of the most repressive in Eastern Europe -
November 1989: uprising against Ceausescu - him and his wife were arrested and executed by the army on christmas day, 1989
222-223 Abby
End of the USSR
Gorbachev's policies brought admiration in 1990 he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize
Failure to bring about an improvement in the country’s economic situation meant that he became increasingly unpopular
Events in eastern europe brought about calls for independence from he republics of the Soviet Union
During 1991 Soviet empire disintegrated in august Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania claimed their independence, as did other republics that had been part of USSR
Break up of the USSR intensified hostility towards Gorbachev in Soviet Union in August 1991 there was an attempted coup by Communist hardliners against him
Defeated by Boris Yelsin who had more radical view on how to deal with economy, structure of soviet union and position of communist party
Gorbachev was restored as a result of Yeltsin standing up to harliners now losing authority
He was humiliated by Yeltsin on his return and on 25 december 1991 Gobachev resigned as president of USSR
Commonwealth of Independent States was established Soviet Union ceased to exist
Impact of the collapse of the USSR and end of Cold War
Collapse of Soviet UNion had impact on international politics as well as the economic situation of countries that had been dependent on the soviet union for aid
U.S. seemed as winners international politics became uni-polar with U.S. as the only country now capable of military alliance around world
Capitalism seemed to have triumphed
Communis remained official ideology in only a few states (Cuba North Korea Vietnam and China)
For Cuba drying up Soviet economic aid along with U.S. trade embargo bright an economic crisis other regimes in Africa formerly supported by Soviet UNion suffered economically in other states that had been the focus of superpower conflict and fighting (Afghanistan)
11 September 2001 attacks on U.S. led to new focus of U.S. foreign policy war on terror
Islamic extremism = global enemy