Saliva – Physiology, Composition, Functions & Forensic Applications
Mission, Vision & Core Values
Mission: CHRIST aims to be a nurturing ground for an individual’s holistic development so they can contribute effectively to society within a dynamic environment.
Vision: Excellence and Service.
Core Values:
Faith in God
Moral Uprightness
Love of Fellow Beings
Social Responsibility
Pursuit of Excellence
Presenter: Dr. V. Krishnakumar, Ph.D. – Assistant Professor of Zoology, Department of Life Sciences
Saliva – General Overview
Complex biological fluid secreted by acinar cells of major and minor salivary glands.
Serves as an indicator of various plasma constituents; hence, used for clinical and forensic diagnostics.
Predominantly water, yet contains numerous molecules essential for digestion, oral health, immunity and wound repair.
Daily Production & Sources
Volume: 1.0 - 1.5\,\text{L} per day in healthy adults.
Glandular contribution:
Submandibular ≈ 70\%
Parotid ≈ 25\%
Sublingual ≈ 5\%
Production markedly increases during mastication (eating).
Major Physiological Functions
Maintains oral moisture & comfort.
Facilitates chewing, tasting and swallowing.
Provides antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral protection; prevents halitosis.
Supplies proteins & minerals that strengthen enamel, preventing caries & periodontal disease.
Assists in food digestion (carbohydrates & lipids).
Acts as a bicarbonate/phosphate buffer — neutralises acids.
Enables coating & lubrication of oral tissues and prostheses (e.g.
dentures).Promotes wound healing via growth factors and protective peptides.
Functional Molecule Map
Functional Domain | Key Molecules |
---|---|
Antibacterial | Histatin 5, \beta-defensins, cathelicidins |
Antifungal | Histatins |
Antiviral | Mucins |
Wound healing / Growth factors | Histatins, secretory leucocyte protease inhibitor, trefoil factor, leptin, cystatins |
Buffering | Bicarbonate, phosphate, proteins |
Coating & lubrication | Mucins, proline-rich proteins, statherins, cystatins |
Digestion | Amylase, lipase, mucins |
Teeth mineralisation | Statherins, proline-rich proteins, histatins, cystatins |
(Note: Table reproduced from transcript slide content.)
Anatomy of Salivary Glands
Parotid glands
Location: just anterior to each ear.
Two lobes: superficial & deep.
Saliva exits via ducts opening near upper molars.
Submandibular glands
Location: beneath the mandible.
Two parts: superficial lobe & deep lobe.
Ducts open under the tongue.
Sublingual glands
Location: beneath either side of the tongue (floor of the mouth).
Multiple small ducts directly enter the oral cavity under the tongue.
Detailed Composition of Whole Saliva
Water: 99.5\%
Solids: 0.5\%
Inorganic ions
\text{Na}^+, \text{K}^+, \text{Ca}^{2+}
\text{HCO}_3^-, phosphate, chloride, bromide, fluoride
Organic molecules
Enzymes:
\alpha-Amylase (ptyalin)
Maltase
Lingual lipase
Lysozyme
Phosphatase
Carbonic anhydrase
Kallikrein
Glycoproteins / Proteins:
Mucins
Albumin
Proline-rich proteins
Statherins
Cystatins
Histatins
Immunoglobulin A (IgA)
Lactoferrin
Blood-group antigens (ABO)
Low-molecular weight compounds: free amino acids, urea, uric acid, creatinine, xanthine, hypoxanthine
Gases: \text{O}2, \text{CO}2, \text{N}_2
Glucose: normally absent; appears in conditions such as diabetes mellitus.
Key Enzymes & Physico-Chemical Properties
\alpha-Amylase (ptyalin)
Initiates starch digestion; optimum pH = 7.4 (oral pH).
Lingual lipase
Optimum pH \approx 4.0; becomes active when saliva mixes with gastric juice in the stomach.
Kallikrein
Cleaves high-molecular-weight kininogen to produce bradykinin – a potent vasodilator.
Antimicrobial enzymes: Lysozyme, lactoferrin, phosphatase.
Opiorphin: newly discovered salivary peptide exhibiting analgesic (pain-killing) properties.
Neural Control (Reflex Pathway)
Afferent stimuli: thought, sight, smell (cranial nerves VII & IX), and taste (cranial nerve IX).
Central processing: dorsal horn of brainstem.
Efferent pathways:
Parasympathetic fibres via submandibular ganglion (to submandibular/sublingual glands).
Parasympathetic fibres via otic ganglion (to parotid gland).
Sympathetic fibres via cervical ganglion (modulate volume & composition).
Forensic Importance of Saliva
Increasingly utilised as diagnostic & forensic evidence owing to:
Ease of collection (present on skin, envelopes, cigarette butts, bottles, metal cans, chewing gum, tobacco spit, etc.).
Stability of DNA, proteins & antibodies within dried stains.
Ability to provide personal contact information linking victim & perpetrator.
Blood-group & secretor status
Secretors: individuals whose saliva/body fluids express ABO antigens (~80\% of population).
Enables determination of blood type from saliva.
DNA profiling
Buccal epithelial cells in saliva allow generation of STR or other genetic profiles.
Collection & Preservation Guidelines
Dried stains: moisten with sterile water, swab with cotton, air-dry, package in clean tube/bag (avoid contamination).
Moist samples (gum, spit, etc.): seal as-is in airtight container.
Note contamination sources (lipstick, blood) during collection.
Presumptive & Confirmatory Tests
Amylase-based Assays
Principle: saliva has high \alpha-amylase activity.
Two broad categories:
a. Enzymatic activity assays – measure total amylase; cannot distinguish human salivary amylase (HSA) from human pancreatic (HPA) or non-human sources.
b. Target-specific assays – detect HSA proteins or AMY1 RNA; provide higher confirmatory value.
Starch–Iodine Test (classical presumptive assay)
Chemistry: iodine forms dark blue complex with amylose; amylase digests starch → colour loss.
Reagents: 0.5\% soluble starch (e.g., 50\,\text{mg} / 10\,\text{mL H}_2O) and Lugol’s iodine solution.
Phadebas® Test
Commercial colorimetric tablet containing starch bound to an insoluble blue dye; amylase cleavage releases dye → blue halo.
Immunochromatographic kits
Monoclonal antibodies specific to HSA (e.g., Rapid Stain Identification Series – Saliva (RSID)).
Positive colour change confirms human salivary origin.
Alternate Light Source (ALS) Visualisation
Excitation ≈ 470\,\text{nm}; observe fluorescence while wearing orange filters.
Less intense than semen stains; still aids in locating deposits.
Microscopic Examination
Histological staining can reveal buccal epithelial cells → presence of saliva.
Workflow for Forensic Identification of Saliva Stains
Search/Locate → ALS (470 nm) & visual inspection.
Presumptive Testing → starch–iodine or Phadebas.
Confirmatory Testing → RSID-Saliva or equivalent human-specific immunoassay / RNA-based test.
DNA Extraction & Profiling (if sample quality allows).
Ethical & Practical Implications
Non-invasive sampling (e.g.
saliva swab) offers alternative to blood draws; valuable for public health screening and personalised medicine.Must ensure chain-of-custody and contamination control in forensic handling.
Recognition that secretor status can influence evidence interpretation (e.g.
ABO not present in non-secretors).Awareness of potential privacy concerns when extracting genomic data from saliva traces found in public settings.
Quick-Reference Equations & Stats
Daily flow: Q_{saliva} \approx 1.0 - 1.5\,\text{L day}^{-1}
Gland contributions: Q{submandibular} = 0.70Q, Q{parotid} = 0.25Q, Q_{sublingual} = 0.05Q
Optimal pH ranges: pH{amylase} \approx 7.4, pH{lingual\,lipase} \approx 4.0
Secretor prevalence: \sim 80\% of general population.
Study Tips & Concept Connections
Relate buffering role of saliva to acid–base chemistry covered in biochemistry courses.
Compare innate immune molecules (lysozyme, defensins) with systemic immunity topics.
Link bradykinin production (via kallikrein) to vasoactive peptide discussions in physiology.
Remember forensic ALS technique parallels semen & blood stain searches – similar luminology/fluorescence principles.
Use the enzyme-substrate nucleotide concept (starch–iodine) to reinforce enzyme assay logic for practical lab exams.
Potential Exam Questions (Self-Practice)
Describe the mechanism by which saliva prevents tooth decay.
Explain why lingual lipase remains inactive in the oral cavity but becomes active in the stomach.
Outline the steps and reagents of the starch–iodine test for saliva detection.
Discuss the forensic significance of secretor status.
Compare enzymatic versus immunological methods of saliva identification.
End of Notes